Article

Diabetes and colorectal cancer screening among men and women in the USA: National Health Interview Survey: 2008, 2010.

Cancer Causes and Control (Impact Factor: 2.96). 02/2014; 25(5). DOI: 10.1007/s10552-014-0360-z
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Adults with diabetes are at increased risk of being diagnosed with and dying from colorectal cancer, but it is unclear whether colorectal cancer screening (CRCS) use is lower in this population. Using the 2008 and 2010 National Health Interview Survey data, we examined whether guideline-concordant CRCS is lower among men and women with self-reported diabetes.
We calculated the weighted percentage of guideline-concordant CRCS and unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) comparing adults aged 51-75 years with diabetes (n = 6,514) to those without (n = 8,371). We also examined effect modification by age (51-64 and 65-75), race/ethnicity, and number of medical office visits (0-3, ≥4).
The unadjusted prevalence of CRCS among men with diabetes was significantly higher than men without (63.3 vs. 58.0 %; PR = 1.09 95 % CI 1.03-1.16). In adjusted models, this relationship was evident among older [adjusted PR (aPR) = 1.13 95 % CI 1.06-1.21] but not younger men (aPR = 0.99 95 % CI 0.91-1.08; p for interaction term ≤0.01). There was no significant association between diabetes and CRCS among women overall (56.6 vs. 57.9 %; PR = 0.98 95 % CI 0.92-1.04) or by age group. Race/ethnicity and the number of medical visits did not significantly modify the association between diabetes and CRCS for men or women.
Men and women with self-reported diabetes were not less likely to be up to date with CRCS than those without diabetes. Older men with diabetes were more likely to be up to date with CRCS than those without diabetes.

0 Followers
 · 
42 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Self-reported data are often used to determine cancer screening test utilization, but self-report may be inaccurate. We interviewed members of three health maintenance organizations and reviewed their medical records for information on digital rectal exam (DRE), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, fecal occult blood test (FOBT), sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy (response rate 65%). We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, concordance, and kappa statistic to compare the two sources for black men (n = 363), white and other men (n = 847), and women (n = 920) by study location. For DRE, FOBT, sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy, testing rates determined by self-report were higher than those in medical records. Kappa statistics showed fair to good agreement (0.40-0.80) for PSA, sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy among most subgroups. For DRE and FOBT, the agreement was poor except among participants from one HMO. Sensitivity was > or = 80% for sigmoidoscopy among most subgroups, and > or = 85% for endoscopy (sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy), >75% for DRE, and > or = 63% for PSA among all subgroups. Specificity exceeded 80% for FOBT and colonoscopy among all subgroups. Agreement was lower among older age groups. For all tests, agreement was poor between the reasons for testing. Overreporting for some cancer tests should be considered when using self-reported data to evaluate progress towards reaching national goals for prevention behaviors.
    Preventive Medicine 07/2004; 39(1):27-35. DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.024 · 2.93 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For individuals with hypertension, diabetes, or hypercholesterolemia, the relative magnitude of cardiovascular risk factors and the effect of multiple risk factors remains controversial and both treatment practices and health care usage vary. We sought to determine the effect of hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and their combinations on health care utilization and health status through analysis of data from a large national survey. We applied the Anderson model to a cross-sectional representative sample (n=15,107) of the U.S. civilian, noninstitutionalized population (the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey). For diabetes, additional risk factors did not increase the likelihood of emergency room (ER) visits or hospitalizations but were associated with increased outpatient visits and poorer health status. For hypertension, additional risk factors increased the likelihood of hospitalization (but not ER visits), the number of outpatient visits, and poorer health status. For hypercholesterolemia, additional risk factors were associated with increased likelihood of ER visits, hospitalizations, and poorer health status but not more outpatient visits. Diabetes had the largest effect on health care utilization and health status. These findings re-emphasize the magnitude of diabetes as a major risk factor associated with increased ER visits, hospitalizations, outpatients visits, and lower health status.
    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 10/2004; 57(9):954-61. DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.01.011 · 5.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Diabetes eliminates the protective effect of female sex on the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). We assessed sex differences in the treatment of CHD risk factors among patients with diabetes. A cross-sectional analysis included 3,849 patients with diabetes treated in five academic internal medicine practices from 2000 to 2003. Outcomes were stratified by the presence of CHD and included adjusted odds ratios (AORs) that women (relative to men) were treated with hypoglycemic, antihypertensive, lipid-lowering medications or aspirin (if indicated) and AORs of reaching target HbA(1c), blood pressure, or lipid levels. Women were less likely than men to have HbA(1c) <7% (without CHD: AOR 0.84 [95% CI 0.75-0.95], P = 0.005; with CHD: 0.63 [0.53-0.75], P < 0.0001). Women without CHD were less likely than men to be treated with lipid-lowering medication (0.82 [0.71-0.96], P = 0.01) or, when treated, to have LDL cholesterol levels <100 mg/dl (0.75 [0.62-0.93], P = 0.004) and were less likely than men to be prescribed aspirin (0.63 [0.55-0.72], P < 0.0001). Women with diabetes and CHD were less likely than men to be prescribed aspirin (0.70 [0.60-0.83], P < 0.0001) or, when treated for hypertension or hyperlipidemia, were less likely to have blood pressure levels <130/80 mmHg (0.75 [0.69-0.82], P < 0.0001) or LDL cholesterol levels <100 mg/dl (0.80 [0.68-0.94], P = 0.006). Women with diabetes received less treatment for many modifiable CHD risk factors than diabetic men. More aggressive treatment of CHD risk factors in this population offers a specific target for improvement in diabetes care.
    Diabetes Care 04/2005; 28(3):514-20. DOI:10.2337/diacare.28.3.514 · 8.57 Impact Factor