Article

Dissociable neural systems for moral judgment of anti- and pro-social lying

Brain research (Impact Factor: 2.83). 03/2014; DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.02.011

ABSTRACT Pro-social lying, which serves to benefit listeners, is considered more socially and morally acceptable than anti-social lying, which serves to harm listeners. However, it is still unclear whether the neural mechanisms underlying the moral judgment of pro-social lying differ from those underlying the moral judgment of anti-social lying. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to examine the neural activities associated with moral judgment in anti- and pro-social lying. During fMRI scanning, subjects were provided with scenarios describing a protagonist's anti- and pro-social lying and were then asked to judge whether the protagonist's act was morally appropriate. The behavioral data showed that anti-social lying was mostly judged to be morally inappropriate and that pro-social lying was mainly judged to be morally appropriate. The functional imaging data revealed dissociable neural systems for moral judgment in anti- and pro-social lying. The anti-social lying, which was judged to be morally inappropriate, was associated with increased activity in the right ventromedial prefrontal cortex, right middle frontal gyrus, right precuneus/posterior cingulate gyrus, left posterior cingulate gyrus, and bilateral temporoparietal junction when compared with the control condition. The pro-social lying, which was judged to be morally appropriate, was associated with increased activity in the right middle temporal gyrus, right supramarginal gyrus, and the left middle cingulate gyrus when compared with the control condition. No overlapping activity was observed during the moral judgment of anti- and pro-social lying. Our data suggest that cognitive and neural processes for the moral judgment of lying are modulated by whether the lie serves to harm or benefit listeners.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
57 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is a growing interest for the determinants of human choice behavior in social settings. Upon initial contact, investment choices in social settings can be inherently risky, as the degree to which the other person will reciprocate is unknown. Nevertheless, people have been shown to exhibit prosocial behavior even in one-shot laboratory settings where all interaction has been taken away. A logical step has been to link such behavior to trait empathy-related neurobiological networks. However, as a social interaction unfolds, the degree of uncertainty with respect to the expected payoff of choice behavior may change as a function of the interaction. Here we attempt to capture this factor. We show that the interpersonal tie one develops with another person during interaction - rather than trait empathy - motivates investment in a public good that is shared with an anonymous interaction partner. We examined how individual differences in trait empathy and interpersonal ties modulate neural responses to imposed monetary sharing. After, but not before interaction in a public good game, sharing prompted activation of neural systems associated with reward (striatum), empathy (anterior insular cortex and anterior cingulate cortex) as well as altruism, and social significance [posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS)]. Although these activations could be linked to both empathy and interpersonal ties, only tie-related pSTS activation predicted prosocial behavior during subsequent interaction, suggesting a neural substrate for keeping track of social relevance.
    Frontiers in Neuroscience 01/2012; 6:28.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The need for a simply applied quantitative assessment of handedness is discussed and some previous forms reviewed. An inventory of 20 items with a set of instructions and response- and computational-conventions is proposed and the results obtained from a young adult population numbering some 1100 individuals are reported. The separate items are examined from the point of view of sex, cultural and socio-economic factors which might appertain to them and also of their inter-relationship to each other and to the measure computed from them all. Criteria derived from these considerations are then applied to eliminate 10 of the original 20 items and the results recomputed to provide frequency-distribution and cumulative frequency functions and a revised item-analysis. The difference of incidence of handedness between the sexes is discussed.RésuméLa nécessité d'une évaluation quantitative et d'application simple de la fréquence manuelle est discutée. Les inventaires déjà proposés sont passés en revue. Un inventaire de 20 items avec une série d'instructions et de conventions de réponse—et de calcul—est présenté de même que les résultats obtenus sur une population de 1100 jeunes adultes.Les items sont examinés séparément du point de vue des facteurs de sexe, culturel et socio-économiques qui pourraient se rapporter à ces items. Ils sont aussi examinés sous l'angle de leur interrelation mutuelle et avec la mesure globale calculée sur l'ensemble.Les critères obtenus sur ces bases ont été alors appliqués pour éliminer 10 des 20 items originaux et les résultats sont à nouveau calculés pour procurer des fonctions de distribution de fréquence et de fréquence cumulative. De même, une révision de l'analyse des items a été pratiquée sur ces bases. On discute enfin la différence d'incidence de la prévalence manuelle selon les sexes.ZusammenfassungEs wird die Notwendigkeit für eine einfach anwendbare quantitative Einschätzung der Händigkeit diskutiert und über einige frühere Angehungsweisen berichtet. Eine Liste von 20 Teilkomplexen sowie den jeweiligen Instruktionen und Antworten und deren Berechnung wird dargestelt und es wird auβerdem über die damit gewonnenen Untersuchungsergebnisse bei einer Populationsgruppe von 1100 jungen Menschen berichtet. Getrennte Testbewertung erfolgte unter dem Gesichtspunkt des Geschlechts, des kulturellen und sozialökonomischen Status der Probanden und den jeweiligen Beziehungen zwischen ihnen. Alles wurde mit Computer berechnet.Aus den Untersuchungen lieβ sich folgern, daβ 10 der ursprünglich 20 Teiltests und deren Ergebnisse allein geeignet sind, Häufigkeitsbeurteilung der Händigkeit, überwiegende Zahl von Einzelfunktionen und eine revidierte Item-Analyse zu liefern. Es wird der Geschlechtsunterschied der Händigkeit diskutiert.
    Neuropsychologia 04/1971; 9(1):97-113. · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent studies have begun to elucidate the roles played in social cognition by specific neural structures, genes, and neurotransmitter systems. Cortical regions in the temporal lobe participate in perceiving socially relevant stimuli, whereas the amygdala, right somatosensory cortices, orbitofrontal cortices, and cingulate cortices all participate in linking perception of such stimuli to motivation, emotion, and cognition. Open questions remain about the domain-specificity of social cognition, about its overlap with emotion and with communication, and about the methods best suited for its investigation.
    Current Opinion in Neurobiology 05/2001; 11(2):231-9. · 6.77 Impact Factor