Article

Vocal local versus pharmacological treatments for pain management in tubal ligation procedures in rural Kenya: a non-inferiority trial.

BMC Women's Health (Impact Factor: 1.66). 02/2014; 14(1):21. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-14-21
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Vocal local (VL) is a non-pharmacological pain management technique for gynecological procedures. In Africa, it is usually used in combination with pharmacological analgesics. However, analgesics are associated with side-effects, and can be costly and subject to frequent stock-outs, particularly in remote rural settings. We compared the effectiveness of VL + local anesthesia + analgesics (the standard approach), versus VL + local anesthesia without analgesics, on pain and satisfaction levels for women undergoing tubal ligations in rural Kenya.
We conducted a site-randomised non-inferiority trial of 884 women receiving TLs from 40 Marie Stopes mobile outreach sites in Kisii and Machakos Districts. Twenty sites provided VL + local anesthesia + analgesics (control), while 20 offered VL + local anesthesia without additional analgesics (intervention). Pain was measured using a validated 11-point Numeric Rating Scale; satisfaction was measured using 11-point scales.
A total of 461 women underwent tubal ligations with VL + local anesthesia, while 423 received tubal ligations with VL + local anesthesia + analgesics. The majority were aged >=30 years (78%), and had >3 children (99%). In a multivariate analysis, pain during the procedure was not significantly different between the two groups. The pain score after the procedure was significantly lower in the intervention group versus the control group (by 0.40 points; p = 0.041). Satisfaction scores were equally high in both groups; 96% would recommend the procedure to a friend.
VL + local anesthesia is as effective as VL + local anesthesia + analgesics for pain management during tubal ligation in rural Kenya. Avoiding analgesics is associated with numerous benefits including cost savings and fewer issues related to the maintenance, procurement and monitoring of restricted opioid drugs, particularly in remote low-resource settings where these systems are weak.Trial registration: Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR201304000495942.

0 Followers
 · 
74 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This was a comparative study of users of Norplant contraceptive, Subdermal implants and LA Minilap, in rural, urban and peri-urban sites in Kenya during 1991-1993. Both methods are very well accepted by well counselled women seeking long-term, continuous, convenient, highly effective contraception. Norplant users had a mean age of 27.3 years, an average of 2.6 living children and 25.3 per cent were unmarried, while 32.9 percent had completed their families. This compares with 31.3 years, 6.2 living children, 0.6 percent unmarried and 100 percent completed families respectively for LA Minilap. Norplant acceptance rates have continued to rise over the few years since programme inception, and now stand at 5.4 percent of all new acceptors. LA Minilap acceptance trends shows a plateau or moderate down-turn at 21.6 percent of new acceptors. The possible reasons and implications of these observations, along with user characteristics are discussed.
    East African medical journal 10/1994; 71(9):552-7.
  • Source
    Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) 02/2002; 6(32):1-244. DOI:10.3310/hta6320 · 5.12 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unlike wards, where chronic and acute pain are regularly managed, comparisons of the most commonly used self-report pain tools have not been reported for the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. The objective of this study was to compare the feasibility, validity and performance of the Visual Analog Scale (horizontal (VAS-H) and vertical (VAS-V) line orientation), the Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS), the 0-10 oral Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-O) and the 0-10 visually enlarged laminated NRS (NRS-V) for pain assessment in critically ill patients. One hundred and eleven consecutive patients admitted into a medical-surgical ICU were included as soon as they became alert and were able to follow simple commands. Pain was measured using the 5 scales in a randomized order upon enrollment-(T1) and after-(T2) administration of an analgesic or, in absence of pain upon enrollment, after a nociceptive procedure. The rate of any response obtained both at T1 and T2 (success rate) was significantly higher for NRS-V (91%) compared with NRS-O (83%), VDS (78%), VAS-H (68%) and VAS-V (66%). Pain intensity changed significantly between T1 and T2, showing a good validity and responsiveness for the 5 scales, which correlated well between each other. The negative predictive value calculated from true and false negatives defined by real and false absence of pain was highest for NRS-V (90%). In conclusion, the NRS-V should be the tool of choice for the ICU setting, because it is the most feasible and discriminative self-report scale for measuring critically ill patients' pain intensity.
    Pain 12/2010; 151(3):711-21. DOI:10.1016/j.pain.2010.08.039 · 5.84 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
29 Downloads
Available from
Jun 3, 2014
Available from