Article

Lack of difference between continuous versus intermittent heparin infusion on maintenance of intra-arterial catheter in postoperative pediatric surgery: a randomized controlled study.

Revista paulista de pediatria : orgão oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de São Paulo 12/2013; 31(4):516-22. DOI: 10.1590/S0103-05822013000400015
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To compare two systems of arterial catheters maintenance in postoperative pediatric surgery using intermittent or continuous infusion of heparin solution and to analyze adverse events related to the site of catheter insertion and the volume of infused heparin solution.
Randomized control trial with 140 patients selected for continuous infusion group (CIG) and intermittent infusion group (IIG). The variables analyzed were: type of heart disease, permanence time and size of the catheter, insertion site, technique used, volume of heparin solution and adverse events. The descriptive variables were analyzed by Student's t-test and the categorical variables, by chi-square test, being significant p<0.05.
The median age was 11 (0-22) months, and 77 (55%) were females. No significant differences between studied variables were found, except for the volume used in CIG (12.0±1.2mL/24 hours) when compared to IIG (5.3±3.5mL/24 hours) with p<0.0003.
The continuous infusion system and the intermittent infusion of heparin solution can be used for intra-arterial catheters maintenance in postoperative pediatric surgery, regardless of patient's clinical and demographic characteristics. Adverse events up to the third postoperative day occurred similarly in both groups. However, the intermittent infusion system usage in underweight children should be considered, due to the lower volume of infused heparin solution [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01097031].

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Maria Witkowski, May 20, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
41 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Arterial catheterization is used frequently in the management of critically ill patients, both for continuous blood pressure monitoring and access to the arterial circulation to obtain frequent blood gas measurements. The procedure is usually easily accomplished at the bedside using percutaneous methods such as the Seldinger technique to cannulate the radial, brachial, axillary, femoral, or dorsalis pedis artery. Meticulous attention to aseptic technique is necessary during insertion and catheter maintenance to minimize the risk of catheter-related infection. Other potential complications include hemorrhage, ischemia, arteriovenous fistula, and pseudoaneurysm formation.
    Critical Care Clinics 11/1992; 8(4):687-97. · 2.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of haemodynamic care is to ensure adequate organ blood flow and oxygen supply. Clinical signs of organ perfusion have limited value in estimation of tissue perfusion, but invasive haemodynamic monitoring is needed to gain information of the underlying pathological condition and to guide oxygen delivery and haemodynamic therapy. Many of the available haemodynamic measurements involve pulmonary artery (PA) catheterization. Pressure measurements from PA catheters require meticulous attention to the dynamic properties of the transducer-pressure line system and appreciation of pressure variation owing to respiration. New techniques of continuous measurement of mixed venous oxygen saturation and cardiac output provide valuable trend data, allowing immediate diagnosis and treatment of pathological changes. Fast-response thermistor PA catheters are useful tools for estimating right ventricular function. Although clinicians generally regard PA-catheter data as a valuable therapy guide, few studies showing the beneficial influence on overall outcome have been carried out, and some studies have reported suboptimal understanding and utilization of these data. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is also a valuable monitor of left ventricular systolic and diastolic function and myocardial ischaemia in anaesthetized patients and in intensive care settings, but it requires a trained operator and is time-consuming. Continuously displayed TEE data, obtainable with automatic border detection, will make TEE even more useful in the near future. More effective monitors of perfusion and oxygenation of individual organs are needed. Less invasive techniques are also constantly sought. Combining data from several noninvasive monitors, including measurements of pulse oximetric O2 saturation, transthoracic impedance cardiac output and transcutaneous oxygen tension, has been reported to reflect closely changes obtained with more invasive monitoring.
    Annals of Medicine 09/1997; 29(4):313-8. DOI:10.3109/07853899708999354 · 4.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper is a report of a review to assess clinical studies comparing the effectiveness of different means of maintaining central venous catheter patency. Flushing with heparin is a routine part of central venous catheter maintenance, but it presents risks, including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Other techniques used to prevent occlusion of catheters include saline flushes, heparin-bonded catheters and pressure caps. A search was conducted using the MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane, National Guideline Clearinghouse and University Healthsystem Consortium databases. A systematic review of effectiveness was conducted, using GRADE criteria to assess the strength of evidence for each intervention. The review period covered 1982 or earlier to January 2008. There is weak evidence that heparin flushing reduces occlusion of catheters, but no evidence that it reduces bloodstream infections. Results from clinical trials of pressure caps are inconsistent regarding their ability to maintain catheter patency, but provide moderate evidence that at least some varieties of caps are associated with increased bloodstream infections. The evidence base on heparin flushing and other interventions to prevent catheter occlusion is small, and published studies are of low quality. There is insufficient evidence on which to conclude that flushing catheters with heparin is more effective than flushing with saline solution.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 10/2009; 65(10):2007-21. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2009.05103.x · 1.69 Impact Factor