Reconsidering Fidelity in Simulation-Based Training

Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges (Impact Factor: 2.93). 01/2014; 89(3). DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000130
Source: PubMed


In simulation-based health professions education, the concept of simulator fidelity is usually understood as the degree to which a simulator looks, feels, and acts like a human patient. Although this can be a useful guide in designing simulators, this definition emphasizes technological advances and physical resemblance over principles of educational effectiveness. In fact, several empirical studies have shown that the degree of fidelity appears to be independent of educational effectiveness. The authors confronted these issues while conducting a recent systematic review of simulation-based health professions education, and in this Perspective they use their experience in conducting that review to examine key concepts and assumptions surrounding the topic of fidelity in simulation.Several concepts typically associated with fidelity are more useful in explaining educational effectiveness, such as transfer of learning, learner engagement, and suspension of disbelief. Given that these concepts more directly influence properties of the learning experience, the authors make the following recommendations: (1) abandon the term fidelity in simulation-based health professions education and replace it with terms reflecting the underlying primary concepts of physical resemblance and functional task alignment; (2) make a shift away from the current emphasis on physical resemblance to a focus on functional correspondence between the simulator and the applied context; and (3) focus on methods to enhance educational effectiveness using principles of transfer of learning, learner engagement, and suspension of disbelief. These recommendations clarify underlying concepts for researchers in simulation-based health professions education and will help advance this burgeoning field.

Download full-text


Available from: Stanley J. Hamstra, Jan 13, 2015
  • Source
    • "It seems that in most cases practitioners refer to the physical resemblance of the training setting as being resembling reality or not. Yet, from a learning perspective, the " functional alignment with the learning task, the instructional design, and the instructor likely have far greater impact on immediate learning, retention and transfer to new settings " (Hamstra et al., 2014, p. 389). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Physical assaults are a pertinent problem of society (e.g. Kajs, Schumacher, & Vital, 2014; Tiesman, Hendricks, Konda, & Hartley, 2014). One strategy in order to prevent violence is to strengthen the capacities to defend oneself (Koss, 1990), which is the scope of various self-defence programs and systems. Self-Defence skills are being taught throughout the world targeting different users. Even though potential effects on daily behaviour include the use of self-protective strategies, it is important to document if individuals learn the skills taught in self-defence classes and if they are able to perform the skills when these are warranted (Gidycz & Dardis, 2014). Very limited behavioural or self-reported information exists about the mastery and use of self-defence skills. This leads to uncertainty in which approach to use regarding the actual application of skills in a real world settings. This lack of identifying key moderators for program effectiveness provides an opportunity for ideologically loaded arguments about which self-defence system or approach can be applied best. Consequently, regarding the effectiveness of self-defence approaches, even in professional domains like the law enforcement sector, there is no consensus on which approach is most effective. The methodological problem in investigating effectiveness of skill application in an experimental setting is the gap between safety and reality. In real world incidents high physical, cognitive and emotional demands are posed on the individual. Due to ethical concerns (e.g. safety of participants) the level of demand can only partially be applied in experimental settings, making it hard to identify key moderators of program effectiveness. The presentation explores how and to what extent simulation designs can bridge the gap between reality and safety, providing a basis for discussion regarding the investigation of self-defence training effectiveness.
    Martial Arts Studies: An International Interdisciplinary Conference, Cardiff; 06/2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: We aim to provide a broad overview of emerging themes in medical education, with recommendations for future research. Following a brief overview of recent changes in medical education and their implications, we focus on suggestions and examples for making progress in this field. Principal findings: In this article, we briefly review the context that has led to the emergence of the competency-based model of medical education. A critical implication is that medical educators must now focus on the development and maintenance of high quality assessment instruments to support valid decisions around advancement and promotion of learners. Rater cognition and " collective competence " are emerging issues that may have profound implications for the identification and assessment of competencies. Conclusions: While competency-based education represents the future, larger systemic effects must be identified and monitored to effect meaningful change in medical education. The authors conclude with a call for increased support for research in medical education and argue that the most promising and fruitful area of medical education scholarship for the future lies in the field of assessment of individual competence.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Much has been made in the recent medical education literature of the incorrect characterization of simulation along a continuum of low to high fidelity (Cook et al. JAMA 306(9): 978-988, 2011; Norman et al. Med Educ 46(7): 636-647, 2012; Teteris et al. Adv Health Sci Educ 17(1): 137-144, 2012). For the most part, the common definition within the medical education community has been that simulations that present highly realistic performance characteristics, contexts, and scenarios are referred to as high-fidelity, while simulations that reduce to-be-learned skills to simpler constructs or constituent parts are referred to as low-fidelity. The issue with this is that highly-realistic has tended to mean the degree to which the simulation looks like the criterion context with little regard for what features of the simulation are in fact relevant to the skill that the educator hopes to teach. The inherent assumption that high fidelity simulations lead to better learning-an assumption for which there is a lack of supporting evidence (Norman et al. Med Educ 46(7): 636-647, 2012)-only exacerbates the problem. So much so that some have suggested that the term be abandoned all together (Hamstra et al. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 2014). While, it is true that fidelity and its importance are misconstrued in the medical education literature, the construct, defined classically as the degree of faithfulness that exists between two entities, is still fundamental to understanding the effectiveness that any one simulation might have in preparing learners for clinical performance. However, the concept of simulation fidelity must be recast in terms of the fundamental information processing events that underpin human performance.
    Advances in Health Sciences Education 04/2014; 19(2). DOI:10.1007/s10459-014-9504-x · 2.12 Impact Factor
Show more