Article

Reconsidering Fidelity in Simulation-Based Training

Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges (Impact Factor: 3.47). 01/2014; 89(3). DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000130
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In simulation-based health professions education, the concept of simulator fidelity is usually understood as the degree to which a simulator looks, feels, and acts like a human patient. Although this can be a useful guide in designing simulators, this definition emphasizes technological advances and physical resemblance over principles of educational effectiveness. In fact, several empirical studies have shown that the degree of fidelity appears to be independent of educational effectiveness. The authors confronted these issues while conducting a recent systematic review of simulation-based health professions education, and in this Perspective they use their experience in conducting that review to examine key concepts and assumptions surrounding the topic of fidelity in simulation.Several concepts typically associated with fidelity are more useful in explaining educational effectiveness, such as transfer of learning, learner engagement, and suspension of disbelief. Given that these concepts more directly influence properties of the learning experience, the authors make the following recommendations: (1) abandon the term fidelity in simulation-based health professions education and replace it with terms reflecting the underlying primary concepts of physical resemblance and functional task alignment; (2) make a shift away from the current emphasis on physical resemblance to a focus on functional correspondence between the simulator and the applied context; and (3) focus on methods to enhance educational effectiveness using principles of transfer of learning, learner engagement, and suspension of disbelief. These recommendations clarify underlying concepts for researchers in simulation-based health professions education and will help advance this burgeoning field.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Stanley J. Hamstra, Jan 13, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
229 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: We aim to provide a broad overview of emerging themes in medical education, with recommendations for future research. Following a brief overview of recent changes in medical education and their implications, we focus on suggestions and examples for making progress in this field. Principal findings: In this article, we briefly review the context that has led to the emergence of the competency-based model of medical education. A critical implication is that medical educators must now focus on the development and maintenance of high quality assessment instruments to support valid decisions around advancement and promotion of learners. Rater cognition and " collective competence " are emerging issues that may have profound implications for the identification and assessment of competencies. Conclusions: While competency-based education represents the future, larger systemic effects must be identified and monitored to effect meaningful change in medical education. The authors conclude with a call for increased support for research in medical education and argue that the most promising and fruitful area of medical education scholarship for the future lies in the field of assessment of individual competence.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Much has been made in the recent medical education literature of the incorrect characterization of simulation along a continuum of low to high fidelity (Cook et al. JAMA 306(9): 978-988, 2011; Norman et al. Med Educ 46(7): 636-647, 2012; Teteris et al. Adv Health Sci Educ 17(1): 137-144, 2012). For the most part, the common definition within the medical education community has been that simulations that present highly realistic performance characteristics, contexts, and scenarios are referred to as high-fidelity, while simulations that reduce to-be-learned skills to simpler constructs or constituent parts are referred to as low-fidelity. The issue with this is that highly-realistic has tended to mean the degree to which the simulation looks like the criterion context with little regard for what features of the simulation are in fact relevant to the skill that the educator hopes to teach. The inherent assumption that high fidelity simulations lead to better learning-an assumption for which there is a lack of supporting evidence (Norman et al. Med Educ 46(7): 636-647, 2012)-only exacerbates the problem. So much so that some have suggested that the term be abandoned all together (Hamstra et al. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 2014). While, it is true that fidelity and its importance are misconstrued in the medical education literature, the construct, defined classically as the degree of faithfulness that exists between two entities, is still fundamental to understanding the effectiveness that any one simulation might have in preparing learners for clinical performance. However, the concept of simulation fidelity must be recast in terms of the fundamental information processing events that underpin human performance.
    Advances in Health Sciences Education 04/2014; 19(2). DOI:10.1007/s10459-014-9504-x
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Simulation-based training (SBT) in gastrointestinal endoscopy has been increasingly adopted by gastroenterology fellowship programs. However, the effectiveness of SBT in enhancing trainee skills remains unclear. We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis of published literature on SBT in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods We performed a systematic search of multiple electronic databases, for all original studies that evaluated SBT in gastrointestinal endoscopy in comparison with no intervention or alternative instructional approaches. Outcomes included skills (in a test setting), behaviors (in clinical practice) and effects on patients. We pooled effect sizes (ES) using random-effects meta-analysis. Results From 10,903 articles, we identified 39 articles, including 21 randomized trials of SBT, enrolling 1181 participants. As compared with no intervention (n=32 studies), SBT significantly improved endoscopic process skills in a test setting (ES, 0.79; n=22), process behaviors in clinical practice (ES, 0.49; n=8), time to procedure completion in both a test setting (ES, 0.79; n=16) and clinical practice (ES, 0.75; n=5), and patient outcomes (procedural completion and risk of major complications; ES, 0.45; n=10). Only 5 studies evaluated the comparative effectiveness of different SBT approaches; these provided inconclusive evidence regarding feedback and simulation modalities. Conclusion Simulation-based education in gastrointestinal endoscopy is associated with improved performance in a test setting and in clinical practice, and improved patient outcomes, as compared to no intervention. Comparative effectiveness studies of different simulation modalities are limited.
    Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology: the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association 05/2014; 12(10). DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.01.037