Article

Effect of Age on the Profile of Psychotropic Users: Results from the 2010 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (Impact Factor: 4.22). 01/2014; 62(2). DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12640
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To describe the effect of age on psychotropic coprescribing, psychiatric diagnoses, and other clinical characteristics.
Analysis of the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.
A national sample of outpatient visits to physicians (N = 2,406) in office-based practice in 2010.
Adults prescribed psychotropic medication (N = 31,229).
Office visits at which antidepressant, anxiolytic, sedative, hypnotic, antipsychotic, or mood stabilizer medications were prescribed were grouped according to participant age (21-64, ≥65) and then compared within each medication class on visit characteristics. and then compared according to variables including provider type, sex, and race; presence of diagnosed mental illness; prescription of other psychotropic agents; total number of chronic conditions; time spent with physician; and total number of medications.
In 2010, there were 90.3 million antidepressant office visits; 77.7 million anxiolytic/sedative/hypnotic visits; 15.5 million antipsychotic visits; and 9.5 million mood stabilizer visits. Nonpsychiatrists prescribed the majority of psychotropic medications for every class and age group; 17.3% of older adult antipsychotic visits and 44.9% of younger adult antipsychotic visits were to a psychiatrist (chi-square = 19.58, P = .001). Older adults in every medication class were less likely to have a diagnosed mental disorder.
Older adults prescribed psychotropic medication were less likely to have a diagnosed mental disorder than their younger counterparts. Efforts to promote quality prescribing should seek to minimize nonspecific use of psychotropic medication.

0 Followers
 · 
54 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Growing evidence shows a high correlation between extensive use of central nervous system-acting drugs (CNSADs) in elderly patients and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as falls, fractures, and mortality. Are results of cognitive testing with the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) influenced by use of CNSADs? Geriatric inpatient service for acute, subacute, and rehabilitation care. Secondary combined analysis of two prospective, single-center study cohorts (PROPSYC, 2011 and AGE OUT, 2012) with identical procedure for the MMSE at a tertiary hospital. Overall, 395 patients were included, 144 male (M) and 251 female (F). Mean age was 80.0 +/- 8.4 years (M 76.7 +/- 9.1, F 81.9 +/- 7.3, p = 0.0000). Mean MMSE points were 22.9 +/- 4.8 (M 23.2 +/- 4.6, F 22.6 +/- 5.0, p = 0.211). In total, 258 patients (65.3 %) used drugs with potential adverse cognitive properties. Analgesics with central activity were given to 117 of 395 patients (29.6 %). Low-potency opioids (tramadol hydrochloride, tilidine) were identified in 60 patients and high-potency opioids in 57 patients. Antidepressants were used in 66 patients, benzodiazepines in 26, and hypnotics in 11, while 38 patients received other CNSADs. We only found significant correlations with the results of cognitive testing for sedatives (diazepam and oxazepam, Pearson's r -aEuro parts per thousand 0.79, p = 0.05), but not for lorazepam. Our analysis shows an influence of sedatives (diazepam and oxazepam, but not lorazepam) on cognitive testing with the MMSE in users of CNSADs.
    Zeitschrift für Gerontologie + Geriatrie 06/2014; 47(4):279-284. DOI:10.1007/s00391-014-0654-5 · 1.02 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective The objective of this study is to understand the characteristics of older adults on newly prescribed psychotropic medication with minimal psychiatric symptoms.Methods Naturalistic cohort study of non-institutionalized older adults in Pennsylvania participating in the Pharmaceutical Assistance Contract for the Elderly. Persons newly prescribed antidepressant or anxiolytic monotherapy or combination therapy were contacted for clinical assessment by a telephone-based behavioral health service. The initial assessment included standardized mental health screening instruments and scales including the Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration test, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Medical Outcomes Survey (SF-12). In addition, patients were asked for their understanding of the prescription indication.ResultsOf the 254 participants who met minimal symptom criteria (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 < 5 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 < 5), women comprised slightly more of the anxiolytic compared with antidepressant monotherapy group (88.9% vs. 76.7%, p = 0.04). The most common self-reported reason for prescription of an antidepressant or anxiolytic was depression or anxiety, respectively, despite near-absence of these symptoms on clinical assessment. Comparing monotherapy to combination therapy groups, those with combination therapy were more likely to report a history of depression (12.6% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001) and also report depression as the reason for the prescription (40.2% vs. 21.0%, p < 0.01).Conclusions In this sample of older adults on new psychotropic medication with minimal psychiatric symptoms, there are few patient characteristics that distinguish those on antidepressant versus anxiolytic monotherapy or those on monotherapy versus combination therapy. While quality of care in late-life mental health has focused on improving detection and treatment, there should be further attention to low-symptom patients potentially receiving inappropriate pharmacotherapy. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 08/2014; 30(6). DOI:10.1002/gps.4187 · 3.09 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The 2014 American Geriatrics Society’s Choosing Wisely list cautions against the use of any benzodiazepines or other sedative-hypnotics (BSHs) as initial treatments for agitation, insomnia, or delirium in older adults. Because these symptoms are prevalent among hospitalized patients, seriously ill older adults are at risk of receiving these potentially inappropriate medications. The objectives of this study were to understand the extent to which potentially inappropriate BSHs are being used in hospitalized, seriously ill, older veterans and to understand what clinical and sociodemographic characteristics are associated with potentially inappropriate BSH use.
    Clinical Therapeutics 11/2014; 36(11). DOI:10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.10.007 · 2.59 Impact Factor
Show more