The Localization Reader: Adapting to the Coming Downshift.

Publisher: MIT Press, ISBN: 9780262516877


MIT Press:

Energy supplies are tightening. Persistent pollutants are accumulating. Food security is declining. There is no going back to the days of reckless consumption. But there is a possibility—already being realized in communities across North America and around the world—of localizing, of living well as we learn to live well within immutable biophysical constraints.

Society is shifting from the centrifugal forces of globalization (cheap and abundant raw materials and energy, intensive commercialization, concentrated economic and political power) to the centripetal forces of localization: distributed authority and leadership, sustainable use of nearby natural resources, community self-reliance and cohesion. While attention shifts to the local, there are crucial regional, national and international dimensions.

This book, combining original and classic works, shows how localization—a process of affirmative social change—can enable psychologically meaningful and fulfilling lives while promoting ecological and social sustainability. Topics range from energy dynamics to philosophies of limits, from the governance of place-based communities to the discovery of positive personal engagement. Together they point the way to a transition that can be peaceful, democratic, just and psychologically resilient.

NOTE: All royalties from the sale of this book have been allocated, by contract with the MIT Press, to two community organizations that exemplify localization. Growing Hope is an organization dedicated to helping people improve their lives and communities through gardening and local food security ( and People’s Food Co-op has long sought to feed a community with wholesome food and good work (

Contributors: Gar Alperovitz, Sharon Astyk, Wendell Berry, Adam Dadeby, Raymond De Young, John S. Dryzek, David J. Hess, Robert Hopkins, M. King Hubbert, Ivan Illich, Warren Johnson, Rachel Kaplan, Stephen Kaplan, Karen Litfin, Thomas A. Lyson, Dennis Meadows, Donella Meadows, Lester W. Milbrath, Thomas Princen, Jorgen Randers, Josiah Royce, Kirkpatrick Sale, Ernst F. Schumacher, Michael Shuman, Joseph A. Tainter, Robert L. Thayer

About the editors: Raymond De Young and Thomas Princen are professors at the School of Natural Resources and Environment at the University of Michigan. De Young is the author of numerous peer-reviewed journal articles on conservation psychology and urgent transitions and is the author of The Localization Papers ( and Princen is the author of The Logic of Sufficiency (2005) and Treading Softly: Paths to Ecological Order (2010) and the coeditor of Confronting Consumption (2002), all published by the MIT Press.

Download full-text


DOI: 10.13140/2.1.4821.8563 · Available from: Raymond K De Young, Jan 09, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It is easy to despair at the unsustainability of human behavior; however, such despair may come from taking too narrow and pessimistic a view of human nature. Behavior change does happen but durable change happens only slowly. What is unnerving is that our environmental problems are urgent, perhaps accelerating. This might give rise to intolerance for the slow-change notion suggested in this article. But, in fact, the opposite response is needed from us. The transition we face must be done well the first time with the changes made durable; it is unlikely we will get a second chance.
    Carbon Management 02/2011; 2(6):607-611. DOI:10.4155/cmt.11.59 · 1.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies have typically emphasized one of three major policy alternatives—government (state) ownership, privatization, or user self-governance—to address overuse of “the commons” as a natural resource shared by many competing users. Studies tend to focus on each alternative separately. Government ownership or privatization is usually understood to undermine user self-governing institutional arrangements, while user self-governance has proved to be a very powerful policy alternative in managing the commons in many cases. An important research question arises as to whether a complex policy design can strengthen the competence of user self-governing institutional arrangements. This article defines a complex policy design as one that involves a mix of flexible policy alternatives rather than a rigid alternative to address overuse issues. Drawing on Japan’s irrigation water management experience, this study demonstrates that when a complex policy design is tailored to facilitate user autonomy, it further strengthens user self-governance. The study provides scholars with insight into how self-governing institutional arrangements—which were primarily developed in the existing literature with the government’s role assumed as absent or implicit—could be enhanced when the role is strategically explicit.
    Journal of Hydrology 03/2014; 510:246–258. DOI:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.034 · 3.05 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A conceptual diagram illustrating the relationships among biodiversity, ecosystem processes (or ecosystem functions), ecosystem services, and human well-being in an urban landscape. All the components and their relationships are influenced profoundly by the speed and spatiotemporal pattern of urbanization that is driven primarily by socioeconomic processes. Thus, understanding and improving the ecology and sustainability of urban landscapes and regions should not only consider how urbanization affects these key components but also how their relationships change in time. Human well-being is the primary focus for urban sustainability projects, whereas urban ecological studies often focus on biodiversity, ecological processes, and ecosystem services. In either case, the connections among the key components and their linkages across spatial (landscape–region–globe) and temporal (year–decade–century) scales should be taken into account.
    Landscape and Urban Planning 05/2014; 125. DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.018 · 3.04 Impact Factor

We use cookies to give you the best possible experience on ResearchGate. Read our cookies policy to learn more.