Perceptions of Graduating General Surgery Chief Residents: Are They Confident In Their Training?

Journal of the American College of Surgeons (Impact Factor: 5.12). 01/2013; 218(4). DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.022


Debate exists within the surgical education community about: 1) whether five years is sufficient time to train a general surgeon, 2) whether graduating chief residents feel confident in their skills, 3) why residents choose to do fellowships and 4) the scope of general surgery practice today.

In May 2013 a 16-question online survey was sent to every general surgery program director in the United States for dissemination to each graduating chief resident (CR).

Of the 297 surveys returned, 76% of CRs trained at university programs, 81% trained at 5-year programs and 28% were going directly into general surgery practice. The 77% of CRs who had done over 950 cases were significantly more comfortable than those who had done less (p<.0001). Only a few CRs were uncomfortable performing a laparoscopic colectomy (7%) or a colonoscopy (6%), while 80% felt comfortable being on call at a Level I trauma center. Compared with other procedures, CRs were most uncomfortable with: open common bile duct explorations (27%), pancreaticoduodenectomies (38%), hepatic lobectomies (48%) and esophagectomies (60%) (p<0.00001). Of those going into fellowships, 67% said they truly had an interest in that specialty and only 7% said it was because they did not feel confident in their surgical skills.

Current graduates of general surgery residencies appear to be confident in their skills, including care of the trauma patient. Fellowships are being chosen primarily because of an interest in the subspecialty. General surgery residency no longer provides adequate training in esophageal or hepatopancreatobiliary surgery.

1 Follower
14 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: General surgical training has changed significantly over the last decade with work hour restrictions, increasing subspecialization, the expanding use of minimally invasive techniques, and nonoperative management for solid organ trauma. Given these changes, this study was undertaken to assess the confidence of graduating general surgery residents in performing open surgical operations and to determine factors associated with increased confidence. Methods: A survey was developed and sent to general surgery residents nationally. We queried them regarding demographics and program characteristics, asked them to rate their confidence (rated 1-5 on a Likert scale) in performing open surgical procedures and compared those who indicated confidence with those who did not. Results: We received 653 responses from the fifth year (postgraduate year 5) surgical residents: 69% male, 68% from university programs, and 51% from programs affiliated with a Veterans Affairs hospital; 22% from small programs, 34% from medium programs, and 44% from large programs. Anticipated postresidency operative confidence was 72%. More than 25% of residents reported a lack of confidence in performing eight of the 13 operations they were queried about. Training at a university program, a large program, dedicated research years, future fellowship plans, and training at a program that performed a large percentage of operations laparoscopically was associated with decreased confidence in performing a number of open surgical procedures. Increased surgical volume was associated with increased operative confidence. Confidence in performing open surgery also varied regionally. Conclusions: Graduating surgical residents indicated a significant lack of confidence in performing a variety of open surgical procedures. This decreased confidence was associated with age, operative volume as well as type, and location of training program. Analyzing and addressing this confidence deficit merits further study.
    Journal of Surgical Research 05/2014; 190(2). DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2014.05.014 · 1.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Overall, 25% of American general surgery residents identified as not feeling confident operating independently at graduation, which may contribute to 70% pursuing further training. This study was undertaken to identify intended career plans of general surgery graduates in Canada on a national level, and perceived strengths and weaknesses of training that would affect transition to early practice. Questionnaires were distributed to graduating general surgery residents at a Canadian national review course in 2012 and 2013. Data were analyzed for overall trends. Overall, 75% (78/104) of graduating residents responded in 2012 and 53% (50/95) in 2013. Greater than 60% of respondents were entering a fellowship program upon graduation (49/78 in 2012 and 37/50 in 2013); the most common fellowship choices were minimally invasive surgery (24% in 2012 and 39% in 2013) or surgical oncology (16% in 2012). Most residents reported that they were completing subspecialty training to meet career goals (64/85 overall) rather than feeling unprepared for practice (0/85 overall). Most residents planned on practicing in urban centers (54%) and academic hospitals (73%). Residents perceived a need for assistance for laparoscopic adrenalectomy, neck dissection, laparoscopic splenectomy, laparoscopic low anterior resection, groin dissection, and thyroidectomy. An overwhelming majority of general surgery graduates plan to pursue fellowship training to meet career goals of working in urban, academic centers, rather than a perceived lack of competence. It is vital to describe operative competency expectations for residents and to promote a variety of practice opportunities following graduation. Crown Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
    Journal of Surgical Education 08/2014; 72(2). DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.10.001 · 1.38 Impact Factor

  • Journal of the American College of Surgeons 11/2014; 220(6). DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.11.019 · 5.12 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications