No full-text available
To read the full-text of this research,
you can request a copy directly from the authors.
The impact of obesity on abdominal wall function after free autologous breast reconstruction
Abstract
The functional impact of obesity on abdominal wall strength after abdominally based autologous reconstruction is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if obesity alters the postoperative abdominal wall strength profile after autologous reconstruction.
We prospectively examined abdominal wall strength and function following autologous breast reconstruction between 2005 and 2010. Enrolled patients completed functional testing [upper abdominal strength (UA), lower abdominal strength (LA), and functional independence measure (FIM)] and psychometric testing utilizing the short form 36 (SF36). Data were obtained at preoperative, early (<90d), and late (90-365d) follow-up visits. Obese patients were compared with non-obese patients in both unilateral and bilateral reconstructions.
Overall, 167 patients were enrolled, with obesity noted in 34% of patients. Obese Unilateral reconstruction patients had lower preoperative UA strength (4.7 vs.4.2, P=0.05) and FIM (6.7 vs. 6.9, P=0.008) scores compared with non-obese patients. These scores significantly worsened in all patients from preoperative to early follow-up, yet scores did not differ at late follow-up between obesity cohorts. Obese bilateral reconstruction patients had similar preoperative functional scores; however, UA strength scores at early (2.5 vs. 3.2, P=0.008) and late (3.6 vs. 4.3, P=0.005) follow-up were significantly lower compared with non-obese patients. No differences in subjective health were noted in follow-up for unilateral or bilateral reconstructions.
Obesity significantly impacts the abdominal function profile of autologous breast reconstruction patients; however, subjective physical and mental health differences are less notable. This is especially true for obese patients who undergo bilateral reconstructions. In these patients, a careful balance between optimizing flap perfusion, limiting donor site morbidity, and enabling functional recovery should be considered. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2013.
... Furthermore, obesity continues to be an epidemic, with multiple adverse health and functional impacts [13][14][15][16]. Recent studies have demonstrated that obesity places patients at higher risk for complications after breast reconstruction and can impact early functional recovery, especially in bilateral reconstruction patients [17][18][19][20][21]. The long-term impact of autologous reconstruction on these patients is also undefined. ...
... Obesity is a known risk factor for complications after autologous breast reconstruction [18], which have been shown to impact early subjective health [17,32]. In the early follow-up, UA function is impacted in obese patients, however no difference is demonstrated in subjective outcomes [17]. ...
... Obesity is a known risk factor for complications after autologous breast reconstruction [18], which have been shown to impact early subjective health [17,32]. In the early follow-up, UA function is impacted in obese patients, however no difference is demonstrated in subjective outcomes [17]. Interestingly, the current findings show the converse at long term follow upno significant difference in objective findings, but a decrease in general patient reported outcomes (SF36 PHC and MHC). ...
Background:
The long-term impact of abdominally-based free flap breast reconstruction is incompletely understood. The aim of this study is to provide long-term, subjective and objective health data on abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction patients with specific attention to the effects of laterality, flap type and obesity.
Methods:
Patients enrolled in this prospective study between 2005 and 2010 and completed preoperative, early (<1 year) and long-term(5-10 years) evaluations. Objective examination included an assessment of upper (UA) and lower (LA) abdominal function and a functional independence measure (FIM). Patient-reported outcomes included the Short-Form 36 (SF36) and the Breast-Q abdominal well-being module. Scores were compared by laterality (unilateral vs bilateral), flap type (msfTRAM vs.DIEP), and presence of obesity.
Results:
Fifty-one patients were included with an average of 8.1 years follow-up. Overall, 78.8% of patients had stable or improved scores across the UA, LA and FIM, and minimal objective differences across flap laterality or types were observed. Post-operative scores improved for SF36 Physical health (p<0.001) and Mental health (p<0.001), and did not differ based on laterality or flap type. Obesity negatively impacted Physical Health (p=0.002) and Mental Health (p=0.006).
Conclusion:
Abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction is associated with significant improvements in long-term quality of life across key domains of physical and mental health with little functional impairments, and no long-term differences across flap type or laterality. Obese patients, however, may be at risk for subjective physical and mental health impairment, perhaps unrelated to the surgery itself.
... 56 No randomized controlled trials were found. Eighteen studies were specifically designed to investigate the effect BMI has on breast reconstruction, 7,13,[15][16][17][18][19]23,25,26,[30][31][32][33]38,[42][43][44] whereas 15 studies investigated general risk factors, one of which was obesity. 14,[20][21][22]24,[27][28][29][34][35][36][37][39][40][41] Numerical data for meta-analysis could be extracted from 29 papers, six of which investigated prosthetic reconstruction, 7,13,14,22,27,28 22 investigated autologous reconstruction, 15,[18][19][20][21]23,25,26,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][39][40][41][42][43] and five looked at both. ...
... Eighteen studies were specifically designed to investigate the effect BMI has on breast reconstruction, 7,13,[15][16][17][18][19]23,25,26,[30][31][32][33]38,[42][43][44] whereas 15 studies investigated general risk factors, one of which was obesity. 14,[20][21][22]24,[27][28][29][34][35][36][37][39][40][41] Numerical data for meta-analysis could be extracted from 29 papers, six of which investigated prosthetic reconstruction, 7,13,14,22,27,28 22 investigated autologous reconstruction, 15,[18][19][20][21]23,25,26,[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][39][40][41][42][43] and five looked at both. 16,17,24,38,44 Two studies presented data only from obese patients, comparing morbidly with nonmorbidly obese patients, but were included in our metaanalysis as the prevalence of complications in these studies was not significantly different from that in other studies. ...
... Fifteen studies that were comparative were deemed moderate quality. 13,15,17,18,23,25,26,[30][31][32][33][34]36,39,42 ...
... 8 Recent reports with abdominally based microvascular free flaps still document significant donor site complications in obese patient populations ranging from 5% to 60%. 1,3,4,[9][10][11][12][13][14] In addition, there is a more significant rate of fat necrosis and flap failure in these patients not observed in those with BMIs in the normal range. [1][2][3][4]6 Recent reports document operative times between 450 and 700 minutes for unilateral and bilateral reconstructions (not including the oncological resection) in these patient populations, respectively. ...
... Although the newer microvascular methods have decreased donor site morbidity with regard to abdominal wall hernias, wound healing complications are still prevalent and occur with increased frequency in the very obese. [1][2][3][6][7][8][10][11][12][13][14][15] Recently, a report demonstrated a combined 36% readmission rate for medical or surgical complications for patients with an average BMI of 35 kg/m 2 after free tissue transfer breast reconstruction. 9 Microvascular reconstructions require surgical expertise that is not readily available at all institutions. ...
Background:
Postmastectomy reconstruction in obese patients has a significant risk of complications and poor outcomes after implant-based and autologous methods. Here we present 22 consecutive patients with Class III obesity [body mass index (BMI) > 40 kg/m2] who underwent reconstruction with a muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi (MSLD) flap.
Methods:
A chart review of a single surgeon experience with 22 consecutive patients with Class III obesity who underwent postmastectomy reconstruction with an MSLD flap was performed. Demographics, operative details, outcomes, and complications were evaluated.
Results:
Twenty-two patients underwent 29 mastectomy and MSLD reconstructions. There were no flap failures. The average BMI was 47.2 kg/m2, including 12 patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2. Seven breasts demonstrated partial nipple and or mastectomy flap necrosis. There was 1 (3.4%) donor site dehiscence that healed with outpatient wound care and 1 (3.4%) seroma that required multiple aspirations in the office. The average operative times were 178 and 420 minutes for unilateral and bilateral mastectomy and immediate reconstructions, respectively. The average hospital length of stay was 0.56 and 1.3 days for unilateral and bilateral surgeries, respectively.
Conclusions:
These results demonstrate the utility of the MSLD flap in reconstructing the very obese. Operative times and lengths of stay compare favorably with conventional latissimus dorsi flap and abdominal-based microvascular free tissue transfer reconstructions. While our complication rates were higher than historically seen for patients with normal BMIs, there were no instances of flap failure, making this a viable reconstructive option for these very high-risk patients.
... Nelson et al. 58 Prospective 145 Y N Autologous breast reconstruction with abdominal tissue in older patients results in little to no difference in abdominal function as compared with younger patients. Nelson et al. 59 Prospective 167 Y Y Obesity significantly impacts the early postoperative abdominal function profile of autologous breast reconstruction patients, although subjective physical and mental health differences are less notable. Lu et al. 60 Prospective for those with bilateral TRAM procedures, the functional disadvantages of TRAM flaps decreased over time, with most women eventually returning to baseline function. ...
... 58 However, postoperative early objective function significantly worsened in bilateral obese patients, although the same was not noted in subjective analysis. 59 Importantly, postoperative complications were found to significantly impact early physical health, mental health, abdominal strength, and patient satisfaction. However, beyond 1 year, recovery toward baseline seems to occur in the majority of patients. ...
As rates of bilateral mastectomy and immediate reconstruction rise, the aesthetic and psychosocial benefits of breast reconstruction are increasingly well understood. However, an understanding of functional outcome and its optimization is still lacking. This endpoint is critical to maximizing postoperative quality of life. All reconstructive modalities have possible functional consequences. Studies demonstrate that implant-based reconstruction impacts subjective movement, but patients’ day-to-day function may not be objectively hindered despite self-reported disability. For latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction, patients also report some dysfunction at the donor site, but this does not seem to result in significant, long-lasting limitation of daily activity. Athletic and other vigorous activities are most affected. For abdominal free flaps, patient perception of postoperative disability is generally not significant, despite the varying degrees of objective disadvantage that have been identified depending on the extent of rectus muscle sacrifice. With these functional repercussions in mind, a broader perspective on the attempt to ensure minimal functional decline after breast surgery should focus not only on surgical technique but also on postoperative rehabilitation. Early directed physical therapy may be an instrumental element in facilitating return to baseline function. With the patient’s optimal quality of life as an overarching objective, a multifaceted approach to functional preservation may be the answer to this continued challenge. This review will examine these issues in depth in an effort to better understand postoperative functional outcomes with a focus on the younger, active breast reconstruction patient.
... 23 Additionally, other studies examining the topic have utilized tools not condition-specific for breast reconstruction and have demonstrated few significant differences comparing obesity cohorts. 24 The introduction of the BREAST-Q instrument has allowed for validated evaluation of patient satisfaction following breast reconstruction. [25][26][27][28][29][30][31] The use of patient centric parameters in addition to surgical outcome has afforded the most accurate determination of reconstructive efficacy to date. ...
Background
Obesity is a significant public health concern and clear risk factor for complications following breast reconstruction. To date, few have assessed patient-reported outcomes (PROs) focused on this key determinant.
Objective
Our study aimed to investigate the impact of obesity (body mass index ≥ 30) on postoperative satisfaction and physical function utilizing the BREAST-Q in a cohort of autologous breast reconstruction patients.
Methods
An Institutional Review Board-approved prospective investigation was conducted to evaluate PROs in patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction from 2009 to 2017 at a tertiary academic medical center. The BREAST-Q reconstruction module was used to assess outcomes between cohorts preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after reconstruction.
Results
Overall, 404 patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction with abdominal free-tissue transfer (244 non-obese, 160 obese) and completed the BREAST-Q. Although obese patients demonstrated lower satisfaction with breasts preoperatively (p = 0.04), no significant differences were noted postoperatively (p = 0.58). However, physical well-being of the abdomen was lower in the obese cohort compared with their non-obese counterparts at long-term follow-up (3 years; p = 0.04).
Conclusion
Obesity significantly impacts autologous breast reconstruction patients. Although obese patients are more likely to present with dissatisfaction with breasts preoperatively, they exhibit comparable PROs overall compared with their non-obese counterparts, despite increased complications.
... It is a known risk factor for surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound complications, particularly in ventral hernia repair [1][2][3][4][5][6] and abdominal-based breast reconstruction. [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] Closed-incision negativepressure therapy (ciNPT) has been used anecdotally in high-risk patients to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) and wound complications. 14,15 Specifically, complications such as SSI impose one of the most significant economic burdens on our medical system. ...
Background: Obesity is a known risk factor for surgical complications. Closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been used anecdotally in high-risk patients to prevent wound complications and infection. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of ciNPT in reducing the incidence of wound complications and infection in abdominal wall reconstruction.
Methods: A literature search using the PubMed/MEDLINE databases (2006-2016) was conducted to identify publications comparing ciNPT to standard incisional care for abdominal wall reconstruction. Outcomes of interest included surgical site infection, wound dehiscence, seroma, hematoma, reoperation, and readmission. Overall rates and associations were pooled. A fixed and random effects model was used upon meta-analysis. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots.
Results: A total of 11 studies met inclusion criteria. There were 1723 patients included, 681 in the ciNPT group, and 1042 in the standard incisional care group. The majority of patients were obese, diabetic, and had a recent history of smoking. On meta-analysis, the risk of surgical site infection decreased by 51% (relative risk: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [0.41-0.63]). The risk of wound dehiscence decreased by 51% (relative risk: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [0.34-0.76]). There was no significant decreased risk observed with ciNPT use for the outcomes of seroma, hematoma, reoperation, and readmission.
Conclusions: The use of ciNPT reduced the incidence of infection and wound dehiscence in patients with varying risk factors undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction. Future prospective randomized clinical trials are still needed to determine the efficacy of ciNPT in plastic surgery.
Background:
As abdominally based free flaps for breast reconstruction continue to evolve, significant effort has been invested in minimizing donor-site morbidity. The impact on the donor site remains a prevailing principle for breast reconstruction, and thus must be adequately reflected when classifying what is left behind following flap harvest. Although successful in describing the type of flap harvested, the existing nomenclature falls short of incorporating certain critical variables, such as degree of muscular preservation, fascial involvement, mesh implantation, and segmental nerve anatomy.
Methods:
In an effort to expand on Nahabedian's 2002 classification system, this descriptive study revisits and critically reviews the existing donor-site classification system following abdominally based breast reconstruction.
Results:
The authors propose a nomenclature system that emphasizes variability in flap harvest technique, degree of muscular violation, fascial resection, mesh implantation, and degree of nerve transection.
Conclusion:
With this revised classification system, reconstructive surgeons can begin reporting more clinically relevant and accurate information with regard to donor-site morbidity.
The purpose of this study was to (1) determine risk factors predictive of delayed abdominal healing; (2) determine characteristics that perpetuate progression to chronic abdominal wounds and describe the resultant morbidity; and (3) identify outcomes and cost following two treatment strategies-conservative wound care and early reoperative primary closure.
Patients were identified from a database of abdominally based free flaps performed from January of 2005 through July of 2012.
One thousand two hundred eighteen abdominal donor sites were reviewed, and 167 cases (13.7 percent) of delayed abdominal wound healing were identified. Obesity (p < 0.0001), smoking (p = 0.043), bilateral reconstruction (p = 0.006), preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.006), and abdominal mesh (p = 0.028) were independently associated with delayed healing. Initiation of chemotherapy p < 0.0001), wet-to-dry wound care (p = 0.001), negative-pressure wound therapy (p = 0.002), and flap type (p = 0.047) were predictive of chronic wounds, and such wounds generated higher rates of hospital readmission (p = 0.009), mesh complications (p < 0.001), and hernia/bulge (p = 0.006). Patients who underwent delayed primary wound closure were more likely to have a well-healed abdomen within 1 month (90.9 percent versus 24.2 percent; p < 0.0001), resulting in lower cost, fewer hospital readmissions, lower rates of scar revision, and lower rates of mesh complications/hernia/bulge.
Chronic abdominal wounds were associated with abdominal wall sequelae, including hernia. Early reoperative primary wound closure has been successfully and selectively implemented, resulting in improved patient outcomes.
Risk, III.
Background
The prevalence of obesity is rising in Western society. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the available evidence regarding the effect of obesity on outcomes of free autologous breast reconstruction.Methods
Pubmed, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched. Obesity was defined as a BMI ≥ 30. Comparable data from observational studies was combined for pooled analysis and quality assessment of observational studies was performed.ResultsFourteen studies met the inclusion criteria (n = 6,043 patients). Pooled data analysis demonstrated significantly higher prevalences of overall complications, recipient site complications overall, donor site complications overall, donors site wound infection, donor site seroma, abdominal bulge/hernia, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, recipient site delayed wound healing, and partial flap failure, in obese (BMI ≥ 30) compared with nonobese (BMI < 30) patients. A BMI of 40 was identified as a threshold at which the prevalence of complications became prohibitively high. No randomized-controlled trials were found and all studies had methodological weaknesses.Conclusions
Complications in obese patients following free autologous breast reconstruction were higher than in their nonobese counterparts; however the majority of these complications were reported in the studies as being minor. Until better evidence is available this information will help when counseling patients. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2014.
Context The prevalence of obesity and overweight increased in the United States
between 1978 and 1991. More recent reports have suggested continued increases
but are based on self-reported data.Objective To examine trends and prevalences of overweight (body mass index [BMI]
≥25) and obesity (BMI ≥30), using measured height and weight data.Design, Setting, and Participants Survey of 4115 adult men and women conducted in 1999 and 2000 as part
of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a nationally
representative sample of the US population.Main Outcome Measure Age-adjusted prevalence of overweight, obesity, and extreme obesity
compared with prior surveys, and sex-, age-, and race/ethnicity–specific
estimates.Results The age-adjusted prevalence of obesity was 30.5% in 1999-2000 compared
with 22.9% in NHANES III (1988-1994; P<.001).
The prevalence of overweight also increased during this period from 55.9%
to 64.5% (P<.001). Extreme obesity (BMI ≥40)
also increased significantly in the population, from 2.9% to 4.7% (P = .002). Although not all changes were statistically significant,
increases occurred for both men and women in all age groups and for non-Hispanic
whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Mexican Americans. Racial/ethnic groups did
not differ significantly in the prevalence of obesity or overweight for men.
Among women, obesity and overweight prevalences were highest among non-Hispanic
black women. More than half of non-Hispanic black women aged 40 years or older
were obese and more than 80% were overweight.Conclusions The increases in the prevalences of obesity and overweight previously
observed continued in 1999-2000. The potential health benefits from reduction
in overweight and obesity are of considerable public health importance.
A 36-item short-form (SF-36) was constructed to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF-36 was designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys. The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. The survey was constructed for self-administration by persons 14 years of age and older, and for administration by a trained interviewer in person or by telephone. The history of the development of the SF-36, the origin of specific items, and the logic underlying their selection are summarized. The content and features of the SF-36 are compared with the 20-item Medical Outcomes Study short-form.
A 36-item short-form (SF-36) was constructed to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF-36 was designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys. The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. The survey was constructed for self-administration by persons 14 years of age and older, and for administration by a trained interviewer in person or by telephone. The history of the development of the SF-36, the origin of specific items, and the logic underlying their selection are summarized. The content and features of the SF-36 are compared with the 20-item Medical Outcomes Study short-form.
The association between anthropometric indices and the risk of breast cancer was analyzed using pooled data from seven prospective cohort studies. Together, these cohorts comprise 337,819 women and 4,385 incident invasive breast cancer cases. In multivariate analyses controlling for reproductive, dietary, and other risk factors, the pooled relative risk (RR) of breast cancer per height increment of 5 cm was 1.02 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.10) in premenopausal women and 1.07 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.12) in postmenopausal women. Body mass index (BMI) showed significant inverse and positive associations with breast cancer among pre- and postmenopausal women, respectively; these associations were nonlinear. Compared with premenopausal women with a BMI of less than 21 kg/m2, women with a BMI exceeding 31 kg/m2 had an RR of 0.54 (95% CI: 0.34, 0.85). In postmenopausal women, the RRs did not increase further when BMI exceeded 28 kg/m2; the RR for these women was 1.26 (95% CI: 1.09, 1.46). The authors found little evidence for interaction with other breast cancer risk factors. Their data indicate that height is an independent risk factor for postmenopausal breast cancer; in premenopausal women, this relation is less clear. The association between BMI and breast cancer varies by menopausal status. Weight control may reduce the risk among postmenopausal women.
The prevalence of obesity and overweight increased in the United States between 1978 and 1991. More recent reports have suggested continued increases but are based on self-reported data.
To examine trends and prevalences of overweight (body mass index [BMI] > or = 25) and obesity (BMI > or = 30), using measured height and weight data.
Survey of 4115 adult men and women conducted in 1999 and 2000 as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), a nationally representative sample of the US population.
Age-adjusted prevalence of overweight, obesity, and extreme obesity compared with prior surveys, and sex-, age-, and race/ethnicity-specific estimates.
The age-adjusted prevalence of obesity was 30.5% in 1999-2000 compared with 22.9% in NHANES III (1988-1994; P<.001). The prevalence of overweight also increased during this period from 55.9% to 64.5% (P<.001). Extreme obesity (BMI > or = 40) also increased significantly in the population, from 2.9% to 4.7% (P =.002). Although not all changes were statistically significant, increases occurred for both men and women in all age groups and for non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Mexican Americans. Racial/ethnic groups did not differ significantly in the prevalence of obesity or overweight for men. Among women, obesity and overweight prevalences were highest among non-Hispanic black women. More than half of non-Hispanic black women aged 40 years or older were obese and more than 80% were overweight.
The increases in the prevalences of obesity and overweight previously observed continued in 1999-2000. The potential health benefits from reduction in overweight and obesity are of considerable public health importance.
Background: One presumed advantage of the free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap over the free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is decreased donor-site morbidity. The purpose of this stud), was to compare the donor-site morbidity and functional outcomes in women who underwent free muscle-sparing TRAM flap or free DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Methods: All patients who underwent breast reconstruction using a free muscle-sparing TRAM flap or a free DIEP flap performed by the two senior authors at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1999 and 2003 were included in the study. The authors conducted a chart review to obtain demographic data and information regarding flap-related complications and donor-site complications. Each living patient was sent a 12-item questionnaire to elicit her perceptions about donor-site outcomes. Results: One hundred sixty-four patient charts were reviewed (203 flaps). Muscle-sparing TRAM flaps were used in 124 patients (98 unilateral and 26 bilateral). DIEP flaps were used in 35 patients (27 unilateral and eight bilateral). In five bilateral breast reconstructions, a muscle-sparing TRAM flap was used for one side and a DIEP flap was used for the other side. There was no significant difference in flap-related complications or donor-site morbidity between the free muscle-sparing TRAM and free DIEP flaps. Eighty-nine of 159 patients (56 percent) responded to the questionnaire; results showed no significant difference in patient-perceived abdominal function after free muscle-sparing TRAM flaps and free DIEP flaps. Conclusions: In die authors' experience, there is no significant difference in flap-related complications or donor-site morbidity between the free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and the free DIEP flap. Thus, the authors advocate using the most expeditious and reliable flap based on the vascular anatomy of the DIEP system.
The authors assess the risk and safety profiles of both implant and autologous breast reconstructions in the morbidly obese population using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data sets.
The authors reviewed the 2005 to 2010 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases, identifying encounters for Current Procedural Terminology codes including either implant-based reconstruction or autologous reconstruction. Patients were classified and compared based on World Health Organization obesity criteria. Complications were divided into three categories: major surgical complications, wound complications, and medical complications.
During the study period, 15,937 breast reconstructions were identified. The incidence of obesity was 27.1 percent, with 4.0 percent defined as class III (morbidly) obese. Morbidly obese patients had significantly higher rates of almost all complications compared with nonobese patients, including major surgical complications (p < 0.001), medical complications (p < 0.001), respiratory complications (p = 0.015), venous thromboembolism (p = 0.001), and wound complications (p < 0.001). These patients also were more likely to require a return to the operating room both for any reason (p < 0.001) and specifically for prosthesis/flap failure (p < 0.001). Morbid obesity was found to be an independent predictor of wound complications (OR, 2.1; p < 0.001), surgical complications (OR, 1.6; p < 0.001), medical complications (OR, 1.6; p = 0.01), and return to the operating room (OR, 1.5; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the 30-day surgical complication rates between implant and autologous reconstructions in the morbidly obese (p = 0.23).
Morbid obesity is associated with a significantly increased risk of perioperative complications that translates into progressive, higher rates of overall morbidity, regardless of reconstructive modality.
Risk, II.
Obesity is a growing epidemic in the United States (US) affecting more than 33% of adults. We aimed to use the World Health Organization (WHO) obesity stratification scheme to assess the overall risk of obese patients undergoing breast reconstruction using the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2010.
We reviewed the 2005 to 2010 ACS-NSQIP databases identifying encounters for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes including either implant-based reconstruction (immediate, delayed, and tissue expander) or autologous reconstruction (pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous [pTRAM], free TRAM, and latissimus dorsi flap with or without implant). Patients were classified and compared based on WHO obesity criteria: nonobese (body mass index [BMI] = 20 to 29.9 kg/m(2)), class I (BMI = 30 to 34.9 kg/m(2)), class II (BMI = 35 to 39.9 kg/m(2)), and class III (BMI > 40 kg/m(2)).
During the study period 15,937 breast reconstructions were performed. The majority of reconstructions were immediate reconstructions (85.0%) and implant-based (79.1%). The incidence of obesity was 27.1%, with 16.3% defined as class I obese, 6.9% defined as class II obese, and 4.0% defined as class III obese. The WHO-classified obese patients tended to have a progressively higher incidence of comorbid conditions, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (p < 0.001), longer operative times (p = 0.0001), and greater lengths of hospital stay (p = 0.0001). Progressively higher BMIs were associated with higher rates of complications, including wound (p < 0.001), medical (p < 0.001), infections (p < 0.001), major surgical (p < 0.001), graft and prosthesis loss (p < 0.001), and return to the operating room (p < 0.001).
This study characterized the effect of progressive obesity on the incidence of surgical and medical complications after breast reconstruction using a large, prospective multicenter dataset. Increasing obesity is associated with increased perioperative morbidity. Data derived from this cohort study can be used to risk-stratify patients, enhance risk counseling, and advocate for institutional reimbursement in obese patients undergoing breast reconstruction.
The transverse abdominal island flap operation was the method of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and in chest wall reconstruction in 300 patients from September 1980 to July 1986. In 58% (221 of 383 breast reconstructions), the breast mound was formed in a single operation and required no further revision. Only 18 reconstructed breasts required modification after 1 year. Symmetry was achieved without altering the opposite breast in 113 (52% of the 217 unilateral reconstructions). Complications included one total flap loss (0.3%) and 18 partial flap losses (6%). There was one lower abdominal hernia (0.3%) and two small defects in the upper anterior rectus sheath (0.8%). Lower abdominal wall laxity occurred in two patients (0.8%), one requiring repair. As expected, there was some loss of abdominal wall strength after reconstruction but this did not affect sports or work performance in over 90% of patients. Ninety-eight per cent of respondents (272 of 278) judged the operation worth their time and effort. This major operative procedure is indicated only in healthy patients.
: The authors' institution has seen an increase in obese and morbidly obese patients seeking autologous breast reconstruction. The authors provide a comprehensive outcome analysis of patients undergoing abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction.
: The authors identified obese patients receiving free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction. World Health Organization body mass index criteria were used: nonobese (body mass index, 20 to 29.9 kg/m), class I (30 to 34.9 kg/m), class II (35 to 39.9 kg/m), and class III (>40 kg/m). Patient comorbidities, body mass index, complications (medical and surgical), and hospital resource use were examined.
: Eight-hundred twelve patients undergoing 1258 free tissue transfers for breast reconstruction were included. Overall, 66.5 percent (n = 540) were considered nonobese, 22.9 percent (n = 186) had class I obesity, 5.0 percent (n = 41) had class II, and 5.7 percent (n = 45) had class III. Obesity was associated with a significant increase in minor (p = 0.001) and major (p = 0.013) complications. Morbidly obese patients had significantly higher rates of total flap loss (p = 0.006) and longer operative times (p = 0.0002). Complications translated into greater cost and resource consumption (p < 0.001). Muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap experienced a significantly higher rate of hernia compared with other flaps (p = 0.02), without a difference in flap loss rate (p = 0.61).
: Increasing obesity is associated with increased perioperative risk in free abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction, which translated into greater perioperative morbidity, higher hospital cost, and increased health care resource consumption. Higher body mass index is directly related to intraoperative technical difficulty, flap loss, donor-site morbidity, and cost use.
: Risk, II.
The incidence of postoperative abdominal bulge, hernia, and the ability to do sit-ups was reviewed in a series of 268 patients who had undergone free TRAM (FTRAM) or conventional TRAM (CTRAM) flap breast reconstruction. Minimum follow-up was 6 months. Patients were divided into four groups: unilateral FTRAM (FT1P; n = 123), double-pedicle bilateral FTRAM (FT2P; n = 45), single-pedicle CTRAM (CT1P; n = 40), and double-pedicle or bilateral CTRAM (CT2P; n = 60). The incidence of abdominal bulges (3.8 percent) and hernia (2.6 percent) was similar in the four groups. Synthetic mesh, however, was required for reinforcement of donor site closure twice as often in the CTRAM patients. The ability to perform sit-ups was greatest in the FT1P group (63.0 percent), slightly lower in the CT1P group (57.1 percent), still lower in the FT2P group (46.2 percent), and lowest in the CT2P group (27.1 percent; p = 0.0005). Patients reconstructed with an FTRAM flap were more likely to be able to do sit-ups (58.3 percent) than were those reconstructed with a CTRAM flap (38.2 percent; p = 0.0074). Patients who had only one muscle pedicle used were more likely to be able to do sit-ups (61.7 percent) than were those who had two muscle pedicles used (35.6 percent; p = 0.0003). We conclude that the incidence of abdominal bulge or hernia is relatively independent of the type of TRAM flap used and the number of muscle pedicles harvested. On the other hand, postoperative abdominal strength, as measured by the ability do sit-ups, is influenced significantly by both of these factors.
(C)1995American Society of Plastic Surgeons
Promoted by reports of decreased donor-site morbidity, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps have gained significant popularity. Increasing body mass index is associated with poor outcomes in breast reconstruction using traditional techniques. The authors aimed to define complications with increasing body mass index among patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
A retrospective analysis of 639 DIEP flaps in 418 patients was performed. Patients were stratified into five groups based on body mass index. Data regarding medical comorbidities, adjuvant therapies, timing of reconstruction, active tobacco use, and surgical history were collected. Primary outcomes were compared among groups.
The average body mass index for the entire population was 28.3 (range, 17 to 42). Increasing body mass index was associated with increased incidence of hypertension, previous abdominal operations, and length of follow-up. Flap complications stratified by group demonstrated significantly increased delayed wound healing complications in severely obese patients compared with lower body mass index groups. Donor-site complications stratified by body mass index demonstrated significantly increased delayed wound healing and overall complications among morbidly obese patients compared with other groups. Incidence of abdominal wall bulging and hernia formation was not significantly different among groups.
Increasing body mass index predisposes patients to delayed wound healing complications in both flap and donor-site locations. Nevertheless, overall flap complications remain similar across all body mass index groups. Abdominal wall stability was maintained. Given a similar flap complication profile and maintenance of abdominal stability, DIEP flaps are recommended in patients with increased body mass index. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVDENCE: Risk, II.
Autologous breast reconstruction is safe in advanced age, yet no study has examined its effects on the aging abdomen. We, therefore, studied 145 women who participated in a prospective study of abdominal strength following abdominal free flap breast reconstruction, comparing preoperative and late follow-up scores in patients ≥60 years old (11 unilateral, 13 bilateral) compared with patients <60 (58 unilateral, 63 bilateral). Simple in-office tests were utilized to test abdominal strength. No differences were noted in unilateral absolute scores at either time point, however, a decrease in upper abdominal strength was noted in the younger cohort over time (P = 0.01). Bilateral analyses revealed absolute score decreases in upper abdominal strength for both cohorts but no major differences between the two. We conclude that autologous breast reconstruction with abdominal tissue in older patients result in little to no difference in abdominal function as compared with younger patients. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery, 2012.
Today, breast reconstruction with autologous tissue is most commonly done either as a free muscle sparring TRAM flap or as a DIEP flap. Studies of donor site morbidity have shown an advantage in using the DIEP flap. However, this procedure might also be associated with an increased risk of flow related complications and it is also thought to be more demanding and time consuming. A few studies have evaluated the abdominal wall strength after dissection of a TRAM flap or a DIEP flap. However, these studies do not distinguish between the various types of free TRAM flaps and they also compare TRAM procedures preformed in an early period to DIEP procedures done in a later period.
We used an isokinetic dynamometer to measure concentric, eccentric and isometric abdominal muscle strength in 32 patients who had had a unilateral breast reconstruction with a free MS-2 (15) or a DIEP (17) flap in the year 2003.
No significant reduction in muscle strength was observed for concentric or isometric muscle strength. However, significant lower eccentric muscle strength was found in the TRAM compared to the DIEP group (p=0.05). There was no significant difference in abdominal strength between the two flap groups at low to moderate work intensity (isometric/concentric). At the greatest work intensity (eccentric muscle strength) the patients reconstructed with a DIEP flap had a clinical small, but significant advantage over the patients reconstructed with a MS-2 TRAM flap.
The increasing prevalence of obesity may worsen surgical outcomes and confound standardized metrics of surgical quality. Despite anecdotal evidence, the increased risk of complications in obese patients is not accounted for in these metrics. To better understand the impact of obesity on surgical complications, the authors designed a study to measure complication rates in obese patients presenting for a set of elective breast procedures.
Using claims data from seven Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans, the authors identified a cohort of obese patients and a nonobese control group who underwent elective breast procedures covered by insurance between 2002 and 2006. The authors compared the proportion of patients in each group who experienced a surgical complication. Using multivariate logistic regression, the authors calculated the odds of developing a surgical complication when obesity was present.
There were 2403 patients in the obese group (breast reduction, 80.7 percent; reconstruction, 10.3 percent; mastopexy with augmentation, 1.5 percent; mastopexy alone, 3.5 percent; and augmentation alone, 4.0 percent). The occurrence of complications was compared for each procedure to a nonobese control group of 5597 patients. Overall, 18.3 percent of obese patients had a claim for a complication, compared with only 2.2 percent in the control group (p<0.001). Obesity status increased the odds of experiencing a complication by 11.8-fold after adjusting for other variables.
Obesity is associated with a nearly 12-fold increased odds of a postoperative complication after elective breast procedures. As quality measures are increasingly applied to surgical evaluation and reimbursement, appropriate risk adjustment to account for the effect of obesity on outcomes will be essential.
Risk, II.
Microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction has evolved significantly over the last three decades. The muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM), deep inferior epigastric artery perforator, and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps have been developed to minimize abdominal donor-site morbidity. Assuming that harvest of the superficial inferior epigastric artery flap has the same impact on abdominal wall morbidity as performing an abdominoplasty, the authors designed a matched-pair analysis comparing patients' abdominal wall strength after muscle-sparing TRAM flap reconstruction with that after abdominoplasty.
A total of 104 patients were included in the study. Fifty-two TRAM flap patients were matched with 52 abdominoplasty patients for age and body mass index. Outcome measures included postoperative complications, particularly hernia and abdominal bulge formation. Two surveys were used to assess patient satisfaction as well as the impact of the procedure on everyday life.
Both study groups were similar with regard to age, body mass index, past medical history, and postoperative complication rate, including hernia and abdominal bulge formation. Results were similar between the study groups, with the exception of a higher rate of satisfaction with the appearance of the abdominal scar among TRAM flap patients (p=0.03) as well a lower likelihood of TRAM flap patients to engaging in sporting activities postoperatively (p=0.01).
In the present study, the muscle-sparing TRAM flap did not result in a higher rate of postoperative complications related to abdominal wall morbidity. Differences observed regarding the postoperative level of activity are unlikely to be related to the surgical insult to the abdominal wall.
The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the impact of bilateral free flap breast reconstruction on the abdominal wall. This is the second installation of a two-part series. Presented here are bilateral combinations of three techniques: the muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap, deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap, and superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap.
A blinded prospective cohort study was performed involving 234 patients. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and for 1 year postoperatively. At each encounter, patients underwent objective abdominal strength testing using the Manual Muscle Function Test and Functional Independence Measure and psychometric testing using the Short Form 36 questionnaire. At postoperative visits, patients also completed a questionnaire specific to breast reconstruction. Statistical analysis included the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Friedman, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests.
A total of 234 patients were enrolled. Of these, 157 underwent reconstruction, 82 of which were bilateral. There was a significant decline in upper (p=0.02) and lower (p=0.05) abdominal strength from bilateral free TRAM flaps compared with bilateral DIEP flaps. Likewise, there was a significant decline in upper (p=0.055) and lower (p=0.04) abdominal strength from bilateral free TRAM flaps compared with bilateral SIEA flaps. For combinations, the most muscle impairment to least was as follows: free TRAM/free TRAM, free TRAM/DIEP, DIEP/DIEP, DIEP/SIEA, and SIEA/SIEA. The free TRAM/SIEA data were not significant. Although psychometric testing showed trends, there was no significant difference among treatment groups.
Abdominal wall strength following various combinations of bilateral free flap breast reconstruction techniques closely adheres to theoretical predictions based on the degree of surgical muscle sacrifice.
The purpose of this two-part study was to demonstrate the impact of free flap breast reconstruction on the abdominal wall. In Part I, the authors present the results for unilateral techniques.
A blinded, prospective, cohort study was performed involving 234 free flap breast reconstruction patients. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, and followed for 1 year. At each encounter, patients underwent abdominal strength testing using the Upper and Lower Rectus Abdominis Manual Muscle Function Test, the Functional Independence Measure, and psychometric testing using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Patients also completed a satisfaction questionnaire specific to breast reconstruction. Statistical analysis included the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Friedman, and Wilcoxon signed rank tests.
Two-hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled. Of these, 157 underwent reconstruction (75 of which were unilateral), completed follow-up, and were included in the analysis. There was a significantly greater decline in upper abdominal strength in patients undergoing muscle-sparing free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery compared with deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap surgery at early (p = 0.01) and late follow-up (p = 0.02). Unilateral superficial inferior epigastric artery flap procedures (n = 3) were too few for a meaningful conclusion to be reached. Lower abdominal and Functional Independence Measure scores showed no significant differences. Psychometric testing showed that there was a significant decline in physical health within the free TRAM flap group. No significant difference among groups was appreciable.
In unilateral cases, the impact of the muscle-sparing free TRAM flap versus the DIEP flap follows theoretical predictions based on the degree of muscle sacrifice: the muscle-sparing free TRAM flap demonstrated a greater decline than the DIEP flap in certain measurable parameters.
Perforator flap breast reconstruction potentially offers patients greater postoperative abdominal strength compared with traditional TRAM techniques. Our purpose was to perform a systemic review of the published literature regarding abdominal wall function following breast reconstruction and compare outcomes between pedicle TRAM, free TRAM, and perforator flap procedures. We used the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Network, and HAPI databases from January 1966 through November 1, 2007 to identify potentially relevant studies. Inclusion criteria included studies that evaluated subjective or objective functional abdominal outcomes for postmastectomy patients receiving either pedicle TRAM, free TRAM, or deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps. All study designs were included in the review-prospective studies, cross-sectional studies, and retrospective case series. Our search yielded 20 studies on abdominal wall function after autogenous tissue breast reconstruction. Objective measures of abdominal wall function using isometric dynamometry revealed that pedicle TRAM patients experienced up to a 23% deficit, whereas free TRAM patients experienced up to an 18% deficit in trunk flexion. For trunk extension, pedicle TRAM patients experienced up to a 14% deficit, whereas free TRAM patients experienced minimal to no deficits. However, none of the comparative studies of pedicle and free TRAM procedures found significant differences in abdominal wall function between the 2 groups. Studies that compared free TRAM to DIEP flaps found significantly higher flexion abilities in the DIEP groups, with one study reporting an advantage in measures of extension for DIEP flaps. Functional deficits assessed by physiotherapy measures revealed that patients with pedicle TRAM reconstructions experienced the greatest deficit in rectus and oblique muscle function (up to 53%). Free TRAM groups experienced minimal deficit in rectus muscle function, whereas DIEP flaps returned to baseline for both rectus and oblique muscle function. Subjective measures of abdominal wall function were similar across unipedicle TRAM, free TRAM, and DIEP flap procedures. Patients with bilateral pedicle TRAM reconstruction suffered up to a 40% deficit in trunk flexion and up to a 9% deficit in trunk extension. Patients with bilateral pedicle or free TRAM reconstruction also experienced a significant decrease in the ability to perform sit-ups and a significant decrease in activities of daily living, recreational, and laborious activities. With the exception of those who had bipedicled TRAM or bilateral free TRAM procedures, most women reported return to their preoperative function without a decrease in their ability to perform activities of daily living. Although some studies report an objective advantage of DIEP flaps, this does not appear to translate to detriments in the performance of activities of daily living. However, the current data have limitations in study design and generalizability. A multicenter, longitudinal study is needed to assess objective and subjective outcomes in patients with pedicle TRAM, free TRAM, and perforator flaps using standardized and validated measures.
Breast reconstruction is best accomplished with lower abdominal tissue, but this results in abdominal donor-site morbidity. The superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) flap is the least invasive method of lower abdominal flap breast reconstruction; however, there are no published data comparing the donor-site morbidity of SIEA flaps to that of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) or deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps.
The authors used a 12-question patient survey and retrospective chart review to compare donor-site function, pain, and aesthetics in 179 patients who had unilateral or bilateral breast reconstruction with 47 SIEA flaps, 49 DIEP flaps, and 136 muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps during a 5-year period.
Unilateral SIEA flap patients scored higher on 10 of the 12 survey questions compared with unilateral muscle-sparing TRAM flap patients, including reporting significantly better postoperative lifting function (p = 0.02) and nearly significantly shorter duration of abdominal pain (p = 0.06). Bilateral reconstruction patients with at least one SIEA flap scored higher on all 12 survey questions, including reporting significantly better ability to get out of bed (sit-up motion) compared with patients with bilateral muscle-sparing TRAM or DIEP flaps (p = 0.02).
Breast reconstruction using SIEA flaps results in significantly less abdominal donor-site morbidity than DIEP flaps in bilateral cases and free muscle-sparing TRAM flaps in unilateral and bilateral cases. These are clinically relevant differences that are perceived by patients and lead to the authors' recommendation to use SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction when possible to minimize abdominal donor-site morbidity.
The records of 172 patients with repair of incisional hernia in 1976-1985 were reviewed. Follow-up data were collected with a questionnaire and the 40% of patients with symptoms were clinically re-examined. The follow-up time was 3 months to 12 years, mean 4.5 years. The median time between primary operation and first symptoms of incisional hernia was 7 months. Sex, age, smoking, chronic lung disease, obesity, fascial diastasis, site of hernia, surgeon's experience, closure method and suture material were among the factors evaluated as possibly causal. At the time of follow-up 34% of the patients had recurrent hernia. A multifactorial logistic regression analysis revealed obesity as the only factor clearly impairing the result of incisional hernioplasty--good in 87% of the patients with normal weight and in 61% of the overweight. Repeat hernioplasty was performed in 35 cases, but succeeded in only 17. In obese patients repair of an incisional hernia that does not cause serious symptoms is not indicated. More careful selection of patients would improve the results of incisional hernia repair.
The records of 82 women who had undergone unilateral breast reconstruction with the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center were analyzed to determine what effect obesity had on the rate of complications and the aesthetic quality of the ultimate result. The patients were divided into four groups--thin, average, moderately obese, and markedly obese--based on a weight/height index derived by dividing the weight in kilograms by the height in meters. In the thin group (13 patients), the complication rate was only 15.4 percent. In the average group (22 patients), the complication rate was 22.7 percent. In the moderately obese group (35 patients), the complication rate was 31.4 percent. In the markedly obese group (12 patients), the rate was 41.7 percent. Aesthetic results in the abdomen tended to be better in the nonobese group, but in the breast they correlated better with the number of revisions performed than with degree of obesity. The findings in this study suggest that the complication rate of TRAM flap breast reconstruction does increase in proportion to the degree of obesity. Surgeons can therefore avoid many of the complications from TRAM flap surgery by not operating on very obese patients. Reports of complication rates from different authors may vary in part depending on their mix of obese and nonobese patients.
The transverse abdominal island flap operation was the method of breast reconstruction after mastectomy and in chest wall reconstruction in 300 patients from September 1980 to July 1986. In 58% (221 of 383 breast reconstructions), the breast mound was formed in a single operation and required no further revision. Only 18 reconstructed breasts required modification after 1 year. Symmetry was achieved without altering the opposite breast in 113 (52% of the 217 unilateral reconstructions). Complications included one total flap loss (0.3%) and 18 partial flap losses (6%). There was one lower abdominal hernia (0.3%) and two small defects in the upper anterior rectus sheath (0.8%). Lower abdominal wall laxity occurred in two patients (0.8%), one requiring repair. As expected, there was some loss of abdominal wall strength after reconstruction but this did not affect sports or work performance in over 90% of patients. Ninety-eight per cent of respondents (272 or 278) judged the operation worth their time and effort. This major operative procedure is indicated only in healthy patients.
The transverse abdominal island flap is not just another myocutaneous flap. Although it derives its blood supply from myocutaneous perforators, the portion of the skin and fat that overlies muscle comprises only about 20% of its surface. The surface area of the flap by far exceeds the surface area of the entire muscle that carries it. Its hemodynamics are more complicated than usual and consist of delicate communications between the superior and inferior deep epigastric systems and the deep and superficial epigastric systems across the midline. Its use in breast reconstruction has been as exciting as it is complex. We describe our experience with 60 consecutive patients and 65 transverse abdominal island flaps.
Cross-sectional data from the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) were analyzed to test the validity of the MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scales as measures of physical and mental health constructs. Results from traditional psychometric and clinical tests of validity were compared. Principal components analysis was used to test for hypothesized physical and mental health dimensions. For purposes of clinical tests of validity, clinical criteria defined mutually exclusive adult patient groups differing in severity of medical and psychiatric conditions. Scales shown in the components analysis to primarily measure physical health (physical functioning and role limitations-physical) best distinguished groups differing in severity of chronic medical condition and had the most pure physical health interpretation. Scales shown to primarily measure mental health (mental health and role limitations-emotional) best distinguished groups differing in the presence and severity of psychiatric disorders and had the most pure mental health interpretation. The social functioning, vitality, and general health perceptions scales measured both physical and mental health components and, thus, had the most complex interpretation. These results are useful in establishing guidelines for the interpretation of each scale and in documenting the size of differences between clinical groups that should be considered very large.
Twenty-seven free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) and 16 pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction patients were studied for 7 to 41 months (mean, 23 months) postoperatively to compare abdominal sequelae after these two operations. The patient groups were demographically similar; mean age was 47 years in both groups. Subjective grading of the results was similar in both groups. The incidence of minor lower abdominal bulges was higher (44%, 7/16) in the pedicled group than in the free TRAM flap group (4%, 1/27). No hernias were found. Delayed healing of the abdominal scar occurred in 3 free TRAM flap and 1 pedicled TRAM flap patients. Two free TRAM flap (8%) and 7 pedicled TRAM (44%) flap patients had minor edge necrosis of the breast. Trunk strength was tested using an isokinetic device (Lido Multi Joint II), and peak torque for flexion (mean, 111 Nm +/- 25 Nm in the free TRAM flap group and 123 Nm +/- 28 Nm in the pedicled TRAM flap group) and extension (mean, 144 Nm +/- 38 Nm and 167 Nm +/- 45 Nm) were measured. No statistical differences occurred between these groups. Sit-up performance was tested and graded from 1 to 6. Both groups performed equally (4.8 and 4.8) and within normal values for this age group. Ultrasonography of the rectus muscles revealed that in the free TRAM flap group, the rectus muscle of the operated side was significantly thinner (cranial segment 6.8 mm vs. 7.8 mm, p < 0.05), thus the harvesting of a segment of muscle below the umbilicus seems to disturb the quality of the entire muscle. The mean size of the muscular defect in the free TRAM flap group was 4.3 x 6.1 cm. In this study no differences in patient satisfaction or trunk strength could be found between free and pedicled TRAM flap patients.
This study was undertaken to demonstrate that the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap can provide the well-known advantages of autologous breast reconstruction with lower abdominal tissue while avoiding the abdominal wall complications of the transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Eighteen unilateral free DIEP flap breast reconstruction patients were assessed 12-30 months (mean 17.8 months) after surgery. Clinical examination, physical exercises and isokinetic dynamometry were performed preoperatively and two months and one year postoperatively. Intraoperative segmental nerve stimulation, visual evaluation and postoperative CT scans were also used to quantify the damage to the rectus muscle. The 18 patients were then compared with 20 free TRAM flap patients and 20 non-operated controls. Two DIEP flap patients presented with abdominal asymmetry. A limited decrease of trunk flexing strength was noticed but rotatory function was intact. Ten of the TRAM flap patients had umbilical or abdominal asymmetry, bulging or hernias. TRAM flap patients showed a statistically significant reduction in strength to flex and to rotate the upper trunk compared to both the one year postoperative DIEP flap group and the control group. The answers to a questionnaire revealed impairment of activities of daily living for some TRAM flap patients while the activities of all DIEP flap patients were unaffected. Our data demonstrate that the free DIEP flap can limit the surgical damage to the rectus abdominis and oblique muscles to an absolute minimum. We believe it is worthwhile to spend extra operative time, the main disadvantage of this technique, to limit late postoperative weakness of the lower abdominal wall.
Obesity is perhaps the most significant public health problem facing the United States today. Obese patients are at increased risk for numerous medical problems, which can adversely affect surgical outcome. However, these risks have not uniformly translated into increased or prohibitive operative morbidity and mortality in this population. With appropriate perioperative precautions and monitoring, the incidence of serious cardiovascular and pulmonary complications can be minimized. Obese patients can be treated as safely and effectively as their normal weight counterparts under most circumstances and should not be denied surgical treatment for any disorder when surgery constitutes the most appropriate therapy. When indicated, surgical treatment should be considered for patients with clinically severe obesity, since currently it appears to offer the best long-term results for weight control and amelioration of comorbidity.
The aim of the study was to identify the possible relationship between body mass index and intra-abdominal pressure as measured by multichannel cystometry. A retrospective chart review of patients presenting for urodynamic evaluation between January 1995 and March 1996 was carried out. Variables identified included weight, height, intra-abdominal pressure and intravesical pressure as recorded on multi-channel cystometrogram at first sensation in the absence of detrusor activity. Body mass index was defined as weight in kilograms divided by height in square meters. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured intravaginally except in those cases of complete procidentia or severe prolapse, where it was measured transrectally. Adequate data were available on 136 patients. The mean age was 60.6 years (range 30–91); mean body mass index was 27.7 kg/m2 (range 12.7–47.7); and mean intra-abdominal pressure was 27.5 cmH2O (range 9.0–48.0). A strong association between intra-abdominal pressure and body mass index was demonstrated, with a Pearson coefficient correlation value of 0.76 (PP2O), and 18 (13.2%) with detrusor instability. The remaining 13.2% had severe prolapse. Our data demonstrate a significant correlation between body mass index and intra-abdominal pressure. These findings suggest that obesity may stress the pelvic floor secondary to chronic state of increased pressure, and may represent a mechanism which supports the widely held belief that obesity is a common factor in the development and recurrence of GSUI.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in patients undergoing free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap breast reconstruction. All patients undergoing breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps at our institution from February 1, 1989, through May 31, 1998, were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups based on their body mass index: normal (body mass index <25), overweight (body mass index 25 to 29), obese (body mass index > or =30). Flap and donor-site complications in the three groups were compared. A total of 936 breast reconstructions with free TRAM flaps were performed in 718 patients. There were 442 (61.6 percent) normal-weight, 212 (29.5 percent) overweight, and 64 (8.9 percent) obese patients. Flap complications occurred in 222 of 936 flaps (23.7 percent). Compared with normal-weight patients, obese patients had a significantly higher rate of overall flap complications (39.1 versus 20.4 percent; p = 0.001), total flap loss (3.2 versus 0 percent; p = 0.001), flap seroma (10.9 versus 3.2 percent; p = 0.004), and mastectomy flap necrosis (21.9 versus 6.6 percent; p = 0.001). Similarly, overweight patients had a significantly higher rate of overall flap complications (27.8 versus 20.4 percent; p = 0.033), total flap loss (1.9 versus 0 percent p = 0.004), flap hematoma (0 versus 3.2 percent; p = 0.007), and mastectomy flap necrosis (15.1 versus 6.6 percent; p = 0.001) compared with normal-weight patients. Donor-site complications occurred in 106 of 718 patients (14.8 percent). Compared with normal-weight patients, obese patients had a significantly higher rate of overall donor-site complications (23.4 versus 11.1 percent; p = 0.005), infection (4.7 versus 0.5 percent; p = 0.016), seroma (9.4 versus 0.9 percent; p <0.001), and hernia (6.3 versus 1.6 percent; p = 0.039). Similarly, overweight patients had a significantly higher rate of overall donor-site complications (19.8 versus 11.1 percent; p = 0.003), infection (2.4 versus 0.5 percent; p = 0.039), bulge (5.2 versus 1.8 percent; p = 0.016), and hernia (4.3 versus 1.6 percent; p = 0.039) compared with normal-weight patients. There were no significant differences in age distribution, smoking history, or comorbid conditions among the three groups of patients. Obese patients, however, had a significantly higher incidence of preoperative radiotherapy and preoperative chemotherapy than did patients in the other two groups. A total of 23.4 percent of obese patients had preoperative radiation therapy compared with 12.3 percent of overweight patients and 12.4 percent of normal-weight patients; 34.4 percent of obese patients had preoperative chemotherapy compared with 24.5 percent of overweight patients and 17.7 percent of normal-weight patients. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for flap and donor-site complications while simultaneously controlling for potential confounding factors, including the incidence of preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy. In summary, obese and overweight patients undergoing breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps had significantly higher total flap loss, flap hematoma, flap seroma, mastectomy skin flap necrosis, donor-site infection, donor-site seroma, and hernia compared with normal-weight patients. There were no significant differences in the rate of partial flap loss, vessel thrombosis, fat necrosis, abdominal flap necrosis, or umbilical necrosis between any of the groups. The majority of overweight and even obese patients who undertake breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps complete the reconstruction successfully. Both such patients and surgeons, however, must clearly understand that the risk of failure and complications is higher than in normal-weight patients. Patients who are morbidly obese are at very high risk of failure and complications and should avoid any type of TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
Abdominal weakness is a known potential complication of breast reconstruction with a pedicled or free TRAM flap. It has been presumed that the DIEP flap, which involves no muscle resection, does not compromise abdominal muscle strength but little objective research exists to substantiate this. The aims of this retrospective study were to compare abdominal muscle strength following free TRAM flap and DIEP flap, to compare both groups with a control group and to establish the effect of both procedures on functional activities. Fifty women (23 with a DIEP flap, 27 with a free TRAM flap) plus 32 non-operated controls underwent assessment of their abdominal and back extensor muscle strength on a KIN COM isokinetic dynamometer. Two questionnaires were used to establish the impact on function. The TRAM flap group had significant weakness of the abdominal and back extensor muscles compared with the DIEP flap group and the control group. The trend was for the DIEP flap group to have weaker abdominal muscles than the control group. There was a higher level of abdominal pain and a greater number of reported functional difficulties in the TRAM flap group than in the DIEP flap group. This study demonstrates that whilst the DIEP flap can reduce the strength deficit caused by the free TRAM flap, abdominal weakness can still result from the DIEP flap. A randomised controlled trial is currently underway to investigate the effect of preoperative abdominal exercises in preventing/minimising postoperative abdominal muscle weakness in this group.
Obesity can be a contraindication for TRAM flap breast reconstruction. This study reviewed the authors' experience with free TRAM and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient to examine the complication rates associated with each reconstructive method and to determine whether TRAM flap reconstruction can safely be used in these high-risk patients. The records of 221 consecutive TRAM flap reconstructions were reviewed. Preoperative risk factors for morbidity were noted, as well as the incidence of TRAM flap success, operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Patients were categorized as obese if their body mass index was greater than 25.8 kg/m2. Data were tabulated using contingency tables and analyzed using chi-squared statistics. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for flap complications. Of the 221 patients studied, 114 patients were found to be obese (body mass index >25.8 kg/m2). Of these 114 patients, 78 were reconstructed with free TRAM flaps and 36 were reconstructed with pedicled flaps. In these obese patients, the average body mass index was 32 kg/m2 in the free TRAM and 30 kg/m2 in the pedicled TRAM flap reconstructions. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to age or preoperative risk factors. Length of hospital stay and operative time did not differ significantly between the two reconstructive methods. The average duration of follow-up was 24 months in both groups. Complications occurred in 26 percent of free TRAM flap reconstructions and 33 percent of pedicled reconstructions. There was no significant difference between reconstructive methods with regard to overall complication rates. Increasing body mass index was found to have a significant effect on free TRAM flap complications (p = 0.008) but not on pedicled TRAM flap complications. There were no partial or total flap losses in obese free TRAM flap patients; however, there was one case of total flap loss and four cases of partial flap loss in the obese pedicled TRAM flap group. The incidence of flap loss was significantly higher when pedicled TRAM flaps were used for reconstruction in obese patients (p = 0.04). Obese patients who underwent reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps were more likely to experience a complication if they also smoked (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in operating time or length of stay when pedicled and free TRAM flap reconstructions in obese patients were compared. There were more cases of flap necrosis in the pedicled TRAM flap group. Free TRAM flaps may provide some benefit in reducing partial flap loss in obese patients, but overall complication rates were not significantly different between reconstructive methods. Of 114 patients, there was only one case of total reconstructive failure. From these findings, it seems that the free or pedicled TRAM flap can be used successfully for breast reconstruction in the majority of patients with obesity. Surgeons should use the technique with which they are most familiar to obtain consistent results.
Any individualisation of incisional hernia repair requires a profound knowledge of risk factors for recurrence.
A series of 160 patients underwent incisional hernia repair and were prospectively followed up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. We analysed the importance of various variables to predict recurrence.
An overall recurrence rate of 11% ( n=17) was observed. The risk for recurrence was not significantly affected by any of the clinical variables except for obesity ( P=0.03). Even when controlling for the influence of age, gender, hernia size, and surgical technique, obesity remained a significant predictor with a rate ratio of 1.10 per unit BMI (95%-CI: 1.02-1.18; P=0.01).
This and other studies found hernia recurrence to be more likely in obese patients. Probably, such patients, therefore, should receive mesh rather than suture repair.
The authors evaluated rectus abdominis muscle function after deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap elevation. Fifteen consecutive patients who were operated on for breast reconstruction with a free DIEP flap were included in the study. A turn-amplitude electromyographic analysis was used. For each patient, the muscle activity was recorded in the portion of the muscle that was split for the epigastric perforator vessel dissection, and also in the similar portion of the contralateral nondissected muscle. A first electromyographic examination was carried out soon after surgery (mean follow-up, 9 weeks), and a second electromyographic examination was carried out at a later date (mean follow-up, 15 months). The mean activity of the dissected muscles was 50 percent of the activity of the nondissected muscles at the first electromyographic examination and 70 percent at the second electromyographic examination. The authors suggest that the DIEP flap procedure induces a partial denervation of the rectus abdominis muscle in the area of dissection and that reinnervation occurs over time because the entire width of the muscle and sufficient segmental motor innervation are preserved.
Purpose:
To provide physicians and nurses with an overview of the impact of obesity on postoperative wound healing and how preplanning protocols can minimize skin and wound care problems in this patient population.
Target audience:
This continuing education activity is intended for physicians and nurses with an interest in reducing skin and wound care problems in their patients who are obese.
Objectives:
After reading the article and taking the test, the participant will be able to: 1. Identify obesity-related changes in body systems and how these impede wound healing. 2. Identify complications of postoperative wound healing in obese patients and the assessments and intervention strategies that can reduce these complications. 3. Identify skin and wound care considerations for obese patients and the role of preplanning protocols in avoiding problems.
The authors retrospectively reviewed the computerized records of 71 women undergoing 80 deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstructions after mastectomy over a 1-year period. There were 33 normal, 26 overweight, and 12 obese patients. No statistically significant difference in flap complications was found between groups. Overall fat necrosis rates were 11.4 percent for the normal-weight patients, 6.7 percent for the overweight patients, and 6.7 percent for the obese patients. Postoperative hospital time was similar for all groups. The occurrence of abdominal wall fascial laxity was uncommon and similar for all groups. Large (>900 g) reconstructions were completed without prohibitive complications in the reconstruction flap. The DIEP flap represents a significant advance in autologous breast tissue reconstruction. Although concerns regarding fat necrosis rates in DIEP flaps have been voiced, the authors did not see an increasing rate of fat necrosis in their overweight and obese patients, and their overall rate of fat necrosis is comparable to rates reported for free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps. Also, increasing body mass index did not seem to affect the rate of delayed complications of the abdominal wall, such as abdominal wall hernia or bulging. Although it was not statistically significant, the authors did observe a trend toward increased wound-healing complications with increasing body mass index. Their data also support the claim that the complete sparing of the rectus abdominis muscles afforded by the DIEP flap avoids abdominal wall fascial bulging or defects often seen in obese TRAM reconstruction patients. Because flap and wound complication rates are similar or superior to those of other autologous tissue reconstruction techniques and the occurrence of abdominal wall defects is all but eliminated, the DIEP flap likely represents the preferred autologous breast reconstruction technique for overweight and obese patients.
Recent data suggests that increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) is one factor associated with the morbidity of morbidly obese patients, who have a BMI>35 kg/m2. IAP has been proposed to be an abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS). This study investigated the characteristics of IAP in morbidly obese patients.
45 morbidly obese patients (mean BMI55+/-2 kg/m2) had IAP measured using urinary bladder pressure.
The mean IAP for the morbidly obese group was 12+/-0.8 cmH2O, increased when compared to controls (IAP=0+/-2 cmH2O). The IAP correlated to the sagittal abdominal diameter, an index of the degree of central obesity (r=+0.83, P<0.02); however, it did not correlate to basal insulin, body weight, or BMI. The end-expiratory IAP did not change when measured after the laparotomy incision was made, but IAP measured in the last 15 patients increased during the first 2 postoperative days. The IAP for patients with pressure-related morbidity (gastroesophageal reflux disease, hernia, stress incontinence, diabetes, hypertension, and venous insufficiency) was 12+/-1 cmH2O, while those without these morbidities had an IAP of 9+/-0.8 cmH2O.
We conclude that IAP is increased in morbid obesity. This increased IAP is a function of central obesity and is associated with increased morbidity. The degree of IAP elevation correlates with increased co-morbidities. We also conclude that elevation in IAP in morbid obesity is not a true ACS but represents a direct mass effect of the visceral obesity.
One presumed advantage of the free deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap over the free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap is decreased donor-site morbidity. The purpose of this study was to compare the donor-site morbidity and functional outcomes in women who underwent free muscle-sparing TRAM flap or free DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
All patients who underwent breast reconstruction using a free muscle-sparing TRAM flap or a free DIEP flap performed by the two senior authors at the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center between 1999 and 2003 were included in the study. The authors conducted a chart review to obtain demographic data and information regarding flap-related complications and donor-site complications. Each living patient was sent a 12-item questionnaire to elicit her perceptions about donor-site outcomes.
One hundred sixty-four patient charts were reviewed (203 flaps). Muscle-sparing TRAM flaps were used in 124 patients (98 unilateral and 26 bilateral). DIEP flaps were used in 35 patients (27 unilateral and eight bilateral). In five bilateral breast reconstructions, a muscle-sparing TRAM flap was used for one side and a DIEP flap was used for the other side. There was no significant difference in flap-related complications or donor-site morbidity between the free muscle-sparing TRAM and free DIEP flaps. Eighty-nine of 159 patients (56 percent) responded to the questionnaire; results showed no significant difference in patient-perceived abdominal function after free muscle-sparing TRAM flaps and free DIEP flaps.
In the authors' experience, there is no significant difference in flap-related complications or donor-site morbidity between the free muscle-sparing TRAM flap and the free DIEP flap. Thus, the authors advocate using the most expeditious and reliable flap based on the vascular anatomy of the DIEP system.
The detrimental effects of obesity on pedicled and free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap reconstructions, including flap loss, hematoma, and donor-site hernia, are well documented. This study examined the effect of obesity on complications in patients undergoing pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
A retrospective review of 224 pedicled TRAM flaps in 200 patients over a 10-year period was carried out. Patients were divided into three groups: normal weight (body mass index < 25; 47 percent of patients), overweight (body mass index 25 to 29.9; 38 percent), and obese (body mass index > or = 30; 15 percent). There were no statistically significant differences in age, smoking history, radiation/chemotherapy history, distribution of flap pedicle types, timing of reconstruction, percentage of delay procedures performed, or expanders implanted among the three subgroups. Donor-site, flap, and other miscellaneous complications were compared among subgroups, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for flap and donor-site complications.
Compared with normal weight and overweight patients, obese patients had a statistically significantly higher incidence of multiple flap complications (36.7 percent versus 10.6 percent and 36.7 percent versus 10.5 percent, respectively; p = 0.0036) and partial flap necrosis (21.6 percent versus 5.8 percent and 21.6 percent versus 7.1 percent; p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). Lastly, obese patients had a significantly higher incidence of overall (one or more) donor-site complications when compared with normal weight patients (53.3 percent versus 31.9 percent; p = 0.0499).
Obese patients, in contrast to normal weight and overweight patients, have a statistically significantly higher risk for developing overall (one or more) and multiple flap complications, overall donor-site complications, TRAM flap delayed wound healing, and minor flap necrosis.
At long-term follow up we cannot easily differentiate between patients who have undergone free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction in terms of subjective functional limitations of daily activities. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative outcomes and long-term subjective functional deficit in patients following unilateral free TRAM compared with DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Sixty consecutive patients who underwent unilateral autologous breast reconstruction were included in the study, 30 of whom had undergone a DIEP flap, and 30 a free TRAM flap. Surgical and postoperative outcome data were collected and a postal questionnaire was sent to each patient at least 6 months postoperatively consisting of a short functional assessment questionnaire and a Short Form 36 (SF-36) survey.
We found no significant difference in postoperative outcomes or in the subjective ability to perform activities of daily living, including work, domestic activities, sports and hobbies, between patients who underwent TRAM flap breast reconstruction and those who underwent a DIEP flap, and no significant difference between the groups for scores on the physical functioning, role-physical, or bodily pain scales of the SF-36.
We conclude that harvesting of the free TRAM flap results in no significant difference in postoperative outcomes or in the subjective ability to perform activities of daily living compared with the DIEP flap.
Prevalence of obesity in the United States
- Ogden
- Carroll Cl
- Md
- Bk Kit
- Km
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009-2010. NCHS data brief, no 82. Hyatts-ville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012.
Prevalence of obesity in the United States: National Center for Health Statistics
- Cl Ogden
- Md Carroll
- Bk Kit
- Km Flegal
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity
in the United States, 2009-2010. NCHS data brief, no 82. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012.
Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics
- C L Ogden
- M D Carroll
- B K Kit
- K M Flegal
Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity
in the United States, 2009-2010. NCHS data brief, no 82. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2012.
Free tissue transfer in the obese patient: An outcome and cost analysis in 1258 consecutive abdominally based reconstructions
- Fischer