Pełzakowe zapalenie rogówki oka – nowe zagrożenie epidemiologiczne. Acanthamoeba keratitis – the new epidemiological threat

Problemy Higieny i Epidemiologii 12/2013; 94(4):730-733.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To characterize patients with Acanthamoeba keratitis and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of propamidine isethionate 0.1% ophthalmic solution (Brolene) when administered concomitantly with neomycin-polymyxin B-gramicidin ophthalmic solution (Neotricin) in the treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis. Prospective, noncomparative case series. The authors report the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients who entered this multicentered, open-label, clinical trial. Eighty-three patients with Acanthamoeba keratitis representing 87 infected eyes entered the trial. Sixty (69%) of the 87 eyes enrolled had data analyzed for treatment efficacy and safety. Of these 60 eyes, 50 (83%) experienced treatment success. Thirty (60%) patients successfully treated adhered to treatment protocol guidelines. Patients who broke protocol had disease exacerbation during the maintenance therapy phase. The only eyes lost/enucleated were 7 of 17 in which penetrating keratoplasty was performed before eradication of the infectious agent. Propamidine isethionate and neomycin are an effective treatment for Acanthamoeba keratitis. Penetrating keratoplasty should be performed only for visual rehabilitation and not to "debulk" an active infection. The authors advocate treating patients with topical medications, mainly Brolene, until all organisms are eradicated. There should be no signs of infection for at least 3 months in the patients not receiving antiamebic medications before penetrating keratoplasty is performed.
    Ophthalmology 06/1999; 106(5):952-7. · 5.56 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Following laboratory studies on new potential chemotherapy for Acanthamoeba keratitis, when chlorhexidine and propamidine provided an additive in vitro effect, a series of 12 patients with culture-proven Acanthamoeba keratitis from three UK centres was monitored during and after therapy. In all cases the clinical diagnosis was confirmed by amoebal culture. In some instances identification of the protozoa by direct microscopy of corneal tissue was possible. The medication was provided topically in drop form until the keratitis had resolved. In vitro sensitivity to chlorhexidine and propamidine was performed on all isolates and compared with sensitivity to a range of other drugs used for treatment of the infection. In vitro drug testing confirmed that trophozoites and cysts of all 12 Acanthamoeba isolates were fully sensitive to chlorhexidine and propamidine. Therapy was satisfactory for controlling and eradicating the acanthamoebal infection in all patients. Three patients developed discrete stromal infiltration at the site of infection that resolved 1 week after commencing therapy, with or without use of steroids. Two patients developed a late inflammatory effect in the stromal scar at 6 months, which resolved with steroids. No clinical evidence of chlorhexidine toxicity was found in any patients. The combination of topical chlorhexidine and propamidine was very effective for treating Acanthamoeba keratitis provided the drugs were continued for a sufficient period. No drug toxicity or resistance of Acanthamoeba isolates was observed in the 12 treated patients.
    Eye 02/1996; 10 ( Pt 4):413-21. · 1.82 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Parasitology Research 01/2009; 104(3):705-708. · 2.85 Impact Factor


Available from
May 21, 2014