Improved dispersion relations for γγ→ππ

Departamento de Física, Universidad de Murcia, E-30071 Murcia, Spain
Physics Letters B (Impact Factor: 6.02). 01/2008; 659(1-2):201-208. DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.11.030
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT We perform a dispersive theoretical study of the reaction
γγ→ππ emphasizing the low
energy region. The large source of theoretical uncertainty to calculate
the γγ→ππ total cross
section for s≳0.5 GeV within the dispersive approach is removed.
This is accomplished by taking one more subtraction in the dispersion
relations, where the extra subtraction constant is fixed by considering
new low energy constraints, one of them further refined by taking into
consideration the f(980) region. This allows us to make
sharper predictions for the cross section for s≲0.8 GeV, below the
onset of D-wave contributions. In this way, were new more precise data
on γγ→ππ available one
might then distinguish between different parameterizations of the
ππ isoscalar S-wave. We also elaborate on the width of the σ
resonance to γγ and provide new values.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Starting from hyperbolic dispersion relations, we derive a system of Roy–Steiner equations for pion Compton scattering that respects analyticity, unitarity, gauge invariance, and crossing symmetry. It thus maintains all symmetries of the underlying quantum field theory. To suppress the dependence of observables on high-energy input, we also consider once- and twice-subtracted versions of the equations, and identify the subtraction constants with dipole and quadrupole pion polarizabilities. Based on the assumption of Mandelstam analyticity, we determine the kinematic range in which the equations are valid. As an application, we consider the resolution of the γγ→ππ partial waves by a Muskhelishvili–Omnès representation with finite matching point. We find a sum rule for the isospin-two S-wave, which, together with chiral constraints, produces an improved prediction for the charged-pion quadrupole polarizability $(\alpha_{2}-\beta_{2})^{\pi^{\pm}}=(15.3\pm3.7)\times 10^{-4}$ fm5. We investigate the prediction of our dispersion relations for the two-photon coupling of the σ-resonance Γ σγγ . The twice-subtracted version predicts a correlation between this width and the isospin-zero pion polarizabilities, which is largely independent of the high-energy input used in the equations. Using this correlation, the chiral perturbation theory results for pion polarizabilities, and our new sum rule, we find Γ σγγ =(1.7±0.4) keV.
    European Physical Journal C 09/2011; 71(9). · 5.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we perform an amplitude analysis of essentially all published pion and kaon pair production data from two photon collisions below 1.5 GeV. This includes all the high statistics results from Belle, as well as older data from Mark II at SLAC, CELLO at DESY, Crystal Ball at SLAC. The purpose of this analysis is to provide as close to a model-independent determination of the $\gamma\gamma$ to meson pair amplitudes as possible. Having data with limited angular coverage, typically $|\cos \theta| < 0.6-0.8$, and no polarization information for reactions in which spin is an essential complication, the determination of the underlying amplitudes might appear an intractable problem. However, imposing the basic constraints required by analyticity, unitarity, and crossing-symmetry makes up for the experimentally missing information. Final state interactions among the meson pairs are critical to this analysis. To fix these, we include the latest $\pi\pi\to\pi\pi$, ${\overline K}K$ scattering amplitudes given by dispersive analyses, supplemented in the ${\overline K}K$ threshold region by the recent precision Dalitz plot analysis from BaBar. With these hadronic amplitudes built into unitarity, we can constrain the overall description of $\gamma\gamma\to\pi\pi$ and $\overline{K}K$ datasets, both integrated and differential cross-sections, including the high statistics charged and neutral pion, as well as $K_sK_s$ data from Belle. Since this analysis invokes coupled hadronic channels, having data on both $\gamma\gamma\to\pi\pi$ and $\overline{K}K$ reduces the solution space to essentially a single form. We present the partial wave amplitudes, show how well they fit all the available data, and give the two photon couplings of scalar and tensor resonances that appear. These partial waves are important inputs into forthcoming dispersive calculations of hadronic light-by-light scattering.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We reconsider Muskhelishvili–Omnès (MO) dispersive representations of photon–photon scattering to two pions, motivated by the very high statistics results recently released by the Belle collaboration for charged as well as neutral pion pairs and also by recent progress in the determination of the low-energy π π scattering amplitude. Applicability of this formalism is extended beyond 1 GeV by taking into account inelasticity due to $K\bar{K}$ . A modified MO representation is derived which has the advantage that all polynomial ambiguities are collected into the subtraction constants and have simple relations to pion polarizabilities. It is obtained by treating differently the exactly known QED Born term and the other components of the left-hand cut. These components are approximated by a sum over resonances. All resonances up to spin two and masses up to ≃1.3 GeV are included. The tensor contributions to the left-hand cut are found to be numerically important. We perform fits to the data imposing chiral constraints, in particular, using a model independent sum-rule result on the p 6 chiral coupling c 34. Such theoretical constraints are necessary because the experimental errors are dominantly systematic. Results on further p 6 couplings and pion dipole and quadrupole polarizabilities are then derived from the fit. The relevance of the new data for distinguishing between two possible scenarios of isospin breaking in the f 0(980) region is discussed.
    European Physical Journal C 11/2010; 70(1-2). · 5.44 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
Jul 16, 2014