Article

Phantom Limb Pain: A Systematic Neuroanatomical-Based Review of Pharmacologic Treatment

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, The Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago/Northwestern McGaw Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Pain Medicine (Impact Factor: 2.24). 11/2013; 15(2). DOI: 10.1111/pme.12283
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Review the current evidence-based pharmacotherapy for phantom limb pain (PLP) in the context of the current understanding of the pathophysiology of this condition.
We conducted a systematic review of original research papers specifically investigating the pharmacologic treatment of PLP. Literature was sourced from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Studies with animals, "neuropathic" but not "phantom limb" pain, or without pain scores and/or functional measures as primary outcomes were excluded. A level of evidence 1-4 was ascribed to individual treatments. These levels included meta-analysis or systematic reviews (level 1), one or more well-powered randomized, controlled trials (level 2), retrospective studies, open-label trials, pilot studies (level 3), and anecdotes, case reports, or clinical experience (level 4).
We found level 2 evidence for gabapentin, both oral (PO) and intravenous (IV) morphine, tramadol, intramuscular (IM) botulinum toxin, IV and epidural Ketamine, level 3 evidence for amitriptyline, dextromethorphan, topiramate, IV calcitonin, PO memantine, continuous perineural catheter analgesia with ropivacaine, and level 4 evidence for methadone, intrathecal (IT) buprenorphine, IT and epidural fentanyl, duloxetine, fluoxetine, mirtazapine, clonazepam, milnacipran, capsaicin, and pregabalin.
Currently, the best evidence (level 2) exists for the use of IV ketamine and IV morphine for the short-term perioperative treatment of PLP and PO morphine for an intermediate to long-term treatment effect (8 weeks to 1 year). Level 2 evidence is mixed for the efficacy of perioperative epidural anesthesia with morphine and bupivacaine for short to long-term pain relief (perioperatively up to 1 year) as well as for the use of gabapentin for pain relief of intermediate duration (6 weeks).

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Zack Mccormick, Sep 30, 2014
3 Followers
 · 
141 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective In dental applications, as in all other medical applications, pain needs to be prevented or at least controlled. The use of the tooth as a model for studying pain mechanisms is well established. In the current study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the analgesic effects of gabapentin and lornoxicam, respectively, vs a placebo for postendodontic treatment pain.Design and Methods Clinical research was planned as prospective, randomized, and placebo controlled. Each subject was given 600 mg gabapentin (group G: N = 30), 8 mg lornoxicam (group L: N = 30), or a placebo (group C: N = 30) 30 min prior to endodontic treatment.Outcome MeasuresAt 4 (T3), 8 (T4), 12 (T5), and 24 (T6) h after preoperative (T0) time points, the analgesic efficacies of the agents were evaluated by using the visual analog scale (VAS).ResultsIn group G, VAS values were significantly greater at T0 time point than at T5 or T6. T0 time point VAS value in group L was lower than at T4 time point and greater than at T6. In group C, T0 time point VAS values were significantly lower at T3 and T5 time points and greater than at T6 time point. VAS values in group G at T5 time point were significantly lower than in group C or group L (P < 0.05).Conclusions Based on the obtained data, prophylactic lornoxicam controlled postendodontic treatment pain more effectively than did the placebo drugs, and gabapentin was more effective in controlling the pain than either lornoxicam or the placebo.
    Pain Medicine 09/2014; 15(12). DOI:10.1111/pme.12536 · 2.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Mirror therapy has been demonstrated to reduce phantom limb pain (PLP) experienced by unilateral limb amputees. Research suggests that the visual feedback of observing a limb moving in the mirror is critical for therapeutic efficacy.Objective Since mirror therapy is not an option for bilateral lower limb amputees, the purpose of this study was to determine if direct observation of another person's limbs could be used to relieve PLP.Methods We randomly assigned 20 bilateral lower limb amputees with PLP to visual observation (n = 11) or mental visualization (n = 9) treatment. Treatment consisted of seven discrete movements which were mimicked by the amputee's phantom limbs moving while visually observing the experimenter's limbs moving, or closing the eyes while visualizing and attempting the movements with their phantom limbs, respectively. Participants performed movements for 20 min daily for 1 month. Response to therapy was measured using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) and the McGill Short-Form Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ).ResultsDirect visual observation significantly reduced PLP in both legs (P < 0.05). Amputees assigned to the mental visualization condition did not show a significant reduction in PLP.InterpretationDirect visual observation therapy is an inexpensive and effective treatment for PLP that is accessible to bilateral lower limb amputees.
    09/2014; 1(9). DOI:10.1002/acn3.89
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This case study is the first to report successful treatment of bilateral phantom limb pain (PLP) in a patient with bilateral thigh amputation and inefficacious medical treatment using a protocol of graded interventions including mirror therapy (MT). MT is a common treatment for PLP but requires the induction of a visual illusion of an intact limb in the mirror, usually achieved by mirroring the healthy extremity. Here, we illustrate how application of a unilateral prosthesis sufficed to induce the necessary illusion. After sequential imagery, then lateralization training, which alleviated pain attacks, the patient received a further 3-week treatment of mirror treatment. Pain intensity was reduced by more than 85 %; the number of attacks were decreased by more than 90% per day. The analgesic efficacy lasted until the unexpected death of the patient several months later. This case illustrates the mechanisms of MT through overcoming the sensory incongruences underlying the distorted body schema and its efficacy in patients with bilateral amputation.
    Der Schmerz 11/2014; 28(6). DOI:10.1007/s00482-014-1500-9 · 1.50 Impact Factor
Show more