Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability and the Role of Fracture Morphology in Classifying Femoral Shaft Fractures in Young Children

*Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Campbell Clinic §Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville †Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN ‡Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX.
Journal of pediatric orthopedics (Impact Factor: 1.47). 10/2013; 34(3). DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000095
Source: PubMed


Spiral fractures of long bones have long been cited as indications of non-accidental trauma (NAT) in children; however, fracture types are only loosely defined in the literature, and intraobserver and interobserver variability in defining femoral fracture patterns is rarely mentioned. We sought to determine reliability in classifying femoral fractures in young children using a standard series of radiographs shown to physicians with varied backgrounds and training and to determine if a quantitative approach based on objective measurements made on plain radiographs could improve definition of these fractures.
On 50 radiographs, the fracture ratio-fracture length divided by bone diameter-was determined and radiographs were reviewed by 14 observers, including pediatric orthopaedic surgeons, emergency room physicians, and musculoskeletal radiologists, who classified the fractures as transverse, oblique, or spiral. A second review of the images in a different order was carried out at least 10 days after the first.
Overall, intraobserver agreement was strong, whereas interobserver reliability was moderate. Experience level did not correlate with either result. Complete agreement among all observers occurred for only 5 fractures: 3 transverse and 2 spiral. An average fracture ratio near 1.0 appeared to be predictiveof a transverse fracture and a ratio of >3.0, a spiral fracture; ratios between these 2 values resulted in essentially random classification.
The ability to reproducibly classify femoral fractures in young children is highly variable among physicians of different specialties. These results support the belief that fracture morphology has little predictive value in NAT because of the wide variability in what observers classify as a spiral fracture of the femur. Caution should be used in the use of descriptive terms such as spiral, oblique, or transverse when classifying femoral fractures, as well as when evaluating children for possible NAT, because of the variability in classification.
Level III-diagnostic study.

1 Follower
17 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We reviewed cases of 75 battered children with fractures over a 2-year period. The average age was 16 months; 57% were boys. There were 154 fractures (2.0 per child); 77% were acute and 23% were old. The most common fracture occurred in the skull (32%) and the most common long bone fracture occurred in the tibia (16%). The most common long bone fracture pattern was transverse (41%); corner fractures accounted for 28% of long bone fractures. An isolated acute fracture was the orthopaedic injury in 65% of the children, whereas multiple fractures in various stages of healing were present in only 13% of children.
    Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 02/1991; 5(4):428-33. DOI:10.1097/00005131-199112000-00007 · 1.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We reviewed 42 children, aged 1-5 years, with isolated femoral shaft fractures to investigate the possible role of intentional injury in these children. Those children with documented motor vehicle accidents or pathologic fractures were excluded. Follow-up from the Department of Social Services regarding the potential for the fractures being inflicted was obtained. The average age of the children was 3.1 +/- 1.2 years; the fracture was spiral in 28. oblique in six, and transverse in eight; history of a fall was present in 34 and absent in eight. The history was considered suspicious for intentional injury in 14 children. In all 42 children, only one fracture was documented to be inflicted; one other child had prior documentation of intentional injury. From this review, the likelihood of intentional injury to the femoral shaft appears to be low; unfortunately, there were no discriminating clinical parameters to help to determine which injuries were intentional. The clinician should continue to have a high index of suspicion and have the circumstances investigated if concern exists regarding the fracture.
    Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 09/1996; 16(5):585-8. DOI:10.1097/00004694-199609000-00007 · 1.47 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to examine the demographic and injury characteristics of children hospitalized with nonaccidental trauma as a causative factor using a large national database. Of the nearly 2.5 million cases in the database, 1794 (0.1%) were identified through diagnostic coding of abuse. Both sexes were equally represented, and two thirds had Medicaid as their primary payer. About one half of the children were younger than 1 year, but all ages were represented. The most common orthopaedic injuries were fractures of the femur or humerus, and most of those fractures occurred in children younger than 2 years. The most common nonorthopaedic injuries were contusions and brain injuries, with or without skull fracture, and 62 (3.5%) of the abused children died; almost all deaths were associated with brain trauma. Nearly one half of the abused hospitalized children between the ages of 3 and 20 years had a concomitant psychiatric or neurological condition. These data provide the orthopaedic surgeon with additional information to assist in identification of potential cases of nonaccidental trauma. In addition to presence of long bone fractures in infants and toddlers, older children with concomitant psychiatric or neurological conditions presenting with nonaccidental injuries should be assessed for possible abuse.
    Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics 07/2007; 27(4):421-6. DOI:10.1097/01.bpb.0000271328.79481.07 · 1.47 Impact Factor
Show more