For patients undergoing primary total ankle replacement (TAR) with an equinus contracture, gastrocnemius recession may be performed to increase dorsiflexion. We examined whether gastrocnemius recession would significantly increase dorsiflexion even with a negative Silfverskiöld test.
Data were prospectively collected on a consecutive series of 29 patients who underwent TAR. All were deemed to require lengthening of the posterior soft tissue structures for unacceptable equinus contracture. Once each patient was under anesthesia, Silfverskiöld's test was performed. A digital photograph was taken with the ankle at maximum passive dorsiflexion with the knee at 0 degrees of flexion and again with the knee at 30 degrees of flexion. Strayer gastrocnemius recession was then performed in standard fashion in every patient. After recession, Silfverskiöld's test was again performed with photographs obtained in the same manner. The digital photographs demonstrating the results of the preoperative and postoperative Silfverskiöld's tests in both knee positions were analyzed and the degree of ankle dorsiflexion measured.
Regardless of the results of Silfverskiöld's test, after gastrocnemius recession, patients had an average increase of 12.6 ± 1.6 degrees of dorsiflexion with the knee extended compared to the same position preoperatively (P < .0001) and an increase of 10.1 ± 2.0 degrees with the knee flexed (P < .001). In 6 patients Silfverskiöld's test was markedly positive preoperatively; in this group, recession resulted in an average increase of dorsiflexion of 17.8 ± 3.6 degrees with the knee extended (P = .004) and 13.4 ± 5.4 degrees with the knee flexed (P = .055). For the remaining 23 patients with a negative preoperative Silfverskiöld's test, dorsiflexion increased by 11.3 ± 1.6 (P < .0001) and 9.3 ± 2.2 degrees (P = .0003) with the knee extended and flexed, respectively.
Our data show that a gastrocnemius recession resulted in a significant, reproducible increase in dorsiflexion regardless of the results of the Silfverskiöld test while avoiding potential push-off and plantarflexion weakness associated with an Achilles lengthening.
Level IV, case series.
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Background:
Concomitant procedures are being performed with total ankle replacement (TAR) to improve alignment, function, and mobility. The purpose of this study was to examine the differences in outcomes between patients who had a concomitant triceps surae lengthening (gastrocnemius recession [GSR] or triple hemisection [TAL]) versus a group that underwent TAR alone preoperatively and 1 year after TAR.
For this prospective, nonrandomized study, 229 patients (37 GSR, 22 TAL, and 170 TAR alone) were examined. Patient-reported outcomes, physical performance, and lower extremity gait mechanics were completed preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. A series of repeated measures ANOVAs were used to determine significant differences (P < .05), and Tukey's post hoc testing was used to follow any significant ANOVA results.
No difference existed in BMI, age, gender, or dorsiflexion (DF) angle at heel strike between the triceps surae lengthening groups or between preoperative and 1 year following TAR. Walking speed, the physical performance measures, the AOFAS Hindfoot Score, SF-36, peak plantar flexion angle, and the peak plantar flexion moment were significantly improved (P < .001) postoperatively with no differences between the triceps surae lengthening groups. The peak DF angle (P = .006) and the ankle range of motion (P = .014) demonstrated a greater improvement from preoperative to 1 year postoperatively in the triceps surae lengthening groups in comparison to the TAR alone group.
Significant improvements existed between preoperative and 1 year postoperatively for most of the variables of interest independent of the triceps surae lengthening group. This study demonstrated that the use of a concomitant triceps surae lengthening procedure (GSR or TAL) resulted in equivalent outcomes when compared with a group undergoing TAR alone.
Level of evidence:
Level II, prospective comparative study.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.