Durability after discontinuation of nucleos(t)ide therapy in chronic HBeAg negative hepatitis patients

Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou Universitiy School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
Clinical and molecular hepatology 09/2013; 19(3):300-4. DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2013.19.3.300
Source: PubMed


Relapse has been reported after stopping nucleos(t)ide (NUC) therapy in the majority of chronic HBeAg negative hepatitis patients. However, the ideal treatment duration of HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is not well known. We investigated the frequency of relapse in HBeAg negative CHB patients receiving NUC therapy.
The NUC therapy was discontinued at least 3 times undetectable level of HBV DNA leave 6 months space in 45 patients. Clinical relapse was defined as HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >2 times of upper limit of normal range. Virological relapse was defined as HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL.
Clinical relapse developed in 16 (35.6%) and 24 (53.3%) patients after stopping therapy at 6 months and 12 months off therapy, respectively. Virological relapse developed 22 (48.9%) and 33 (73.3%) patients at 6 months and 12 months off therapy. The factors such as age, gender, cirrhosis, baseline AST, ALT, HBV DNA levels, treatment duration, and consolidation duration were analyzed to investigate the predictive factors associated with 1 year sustained response. Of these factors, cirrhosis (86.1% in CHB, 22.2% in LC) was significantly associated with 1 year virological relapse rate. Baseline HBV DNA and total treatment duration tended to be associated with virological relapse.
Virological relapse developed in the majority (73.3%) of HBeAg negative CHB patients and clinical relapse developed in the half (53.3%) of patients at 1 year off therapy. Cirrhosis may be associated with the low rate of virological relapse.

Full-text preview

Available from: PubMed Central
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) for oral antiviral therapy has dramatically improved the clinical outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Although current international guidelines for the management of CHB provide information regarding when to begin the antiviral therapy with NAs, there is no clear consensus on when to stop the treatment, especially for those who respond to the therapy. Hepatitis B surface antigen loss has been regarded as an ideal endpoint of oral antiviral therapy with NAs, however since this is rarely achieved, practical endpoints have been suggested by the international guidelines. Despite the stopping rules recommended by the international guidelines, whether oral antiviral therapy with NAs can be safely discontinued is of major concern. While attention has been drawn to whether antiviral treatment with NAs can be a finite therapy, there is lack of sufficient data on off-treatment durability of highly potent NAs. Based on the available evidences, current guidelines for stopping NA therapy seems to be inadequate in terms of off-treatment durability, with relapse rates of more than 40% for both hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. Therefore, further studies are required to accumulate data on off-treatment durability of highly potent NAs, and future studies are warranted to identify adequate predictive markers that could provide supplementary information to guide the timing of stopping NA therapy.
    World Journal of Gastroenterology 06/2014; 20(23):7207-7212. DOI:10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7207 · 2.37 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Treatment cessation is one of the few challenges left to clinicians to deal with after the marketing and widespread use of third generation oral analogues (nucleos(t)ide analogue (NUC)), entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF) for the treatment of HBeAg negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Treatment efficacy is in fact unquestioned as more than 95% of patients, including NUC experienced and resistant ones, achieve complete suppression of viral replication and improvement of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis within the first 5 years of treatment.1-3 As a consequence, in a majority of patients, progression to cirrhosis is prevented, and clinical decompensation and portal hypertension either improved or prevented, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remaining the only complication in HBeAg negative patients long-term treated for with ETV or TDF.4 Indeed, the yearly attack rates of HCC range between 0.5% and 1% among non-cirrhotics and 2.5% and 4% among compensated cirrhotics, incidence rates not very different from what is expected in untreated patients.4 ,5 In these patients, the recommended stopping rule of NUC therapy is HBsAg seroconversion, defined as HBsAg loss and anti-HBs titres >100-200 IU/L,6-8 which has been proven to be safe in any clinical situation including patients with advanced liver disease, though a minority of patient clearing HBsAg following NUC therapy do not seroconvert to anti-HBs.9 ,10 One major caveat of this stopping rule is the small number of HBeAg negative patients who achieve HBsAg seroconversion, no more than 1% after 5 years and 5% after 10 years of continuous treatment, thereby questioning whether it is appropriate to stop NUC therapy before achieving HBsAg seronegativity. Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) guidelines indeed suggest this, but so far clinical evidence supporting these recommendations is more than scanty. In the study by Seto et al,11 treatment cessation … [Full text of this article]
    Gut 08/2014; 64(4). DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307596 · 14.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this review, evidence is presented that the majority of HBeAg-negative CHB patients previously treated with lamivudine and subsequently with adefovir and entecavir, experience virological and clinical relapse if these therapies were discontinued. Thus current treatment guidelines both of AASLD and EASL recommend indefinite duration of NA treatment in such patients. However, the recommendations of APASL are different, advising a stop of NA treatment if HBV-DNA is negative in three consecutive assays at least 6 months apart. It is clear that the duration of post-treatment sustained remission is variable and its final outcome unpredictable. However, fluctuations of post-treatment HBV-DNA levels are not uncommon and HBeAg-negative CHB patients may experience long periods of transient HBV-DNA undetectability. Data on the frequency of post-treatment HBsAg loss are promising but still limited. The need for prospective, multinational, multicenter studies is stressed.
    09/2014; 13(3). DOI:10.1007/s11901-014-0236-4
Show more