Article

Incidence of food anaphylaxis in people with food allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Department of Paediatrics, Imperial College London, Norfolk Place, London, W2 1PG, UK
Clinical & Experimental Allergy (Impact Factor: 4.32). 10/2013; 43(12). DOI: 10.1111/cea.12211
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Food allergy is a common cause of anaphylaxis, but the incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis is not known. The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis for people with food allergy, and relate this to other mortality risks in the general population.
We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis, using the generic inverse variance method. Two authors selected studies by consensus, independently extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa assessment scale. We searched Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Web of Science, LILACS or AMED, between January 1946 and September 2012, and recent conference abstracts. We included registries, databases or cohort studies which described the number of fatal food anaphylaxis cases in a defined population and time period, and applied an assumed population prevalence rate of food allergy.
We included data from 13 studies describing 240 fatal food anaphylaxis episodes over an estimated 165 million food-allergic person years. Study quality was mixed, and there was high heterogeneity between study results, possibly due to variation in food allergy prevalence and data collection methods. In food allergic people, fatal food anaphylaxis has an incidence rate of 1.81 per million person years (95%CI 0.94, 3.45; range 0.63, 6.68). In sensitivity analysis with different estimated food allergy prevalence, the incidence varied from 1.35 to 2.71 per million person years. At age 0-19 the incidence rate is 3.25 (1.73, 6.10; range 0.94, 15.75; sensitivity analysis 1.18 to 6.13). The incidence of fatal food anaphylaxis in food allergic people is lower than accidental death in the general European population.
Fatal food anaphylaxis for a food allergic person is rarer than accidental death in the general population. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: John O Warner, Sep 23, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
97 Views
 · 
30 Downloads
  • Source
    • "It has been estimated, moreover, that between 10% and 18% of food allergy or anaphylaxis reactions occur at school [4]. In food allergic people aged 0–19 fatal food anaphylaxis was found to have an incidence rate of 3.25 per million person years [5]. Overall, anaphylaxis is a rare event in school-age children, but anaphylaxis and FA deaths have been reported at school [6]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The incidence of food allergy is such that most schools will be attended by at least one food allergic child, obliging school personnel to cope with cases at risk of severe allergic reactions. Schools need to know about food allergy and anaphylaxis management to ensure the personal safety of an increasing number of students. The aim of this study was to investigate Italian school teachers and principals' knowledge, perceptions and feelings concerning food allergy and anaphylaxis, to deeply understand how to effectively support schools to manage a severely allergic child. In addition a further assessment of the impact of multidisciplinary courses on participants was undertaken. 1184 school teachers and principals attended courses on food allergy and anaphylaxis management at school were questioned before and after their course. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze the resulting data. Participants tended to overestimate the prevalence of food allergy; 79.3% were able to identify the foods most likely involved and 90.8% knew the most frequent symptoms. 81.9% were familiar with the typical symptoms of anaphylaxis but, while the majority (65.4%) knew that "adrenaline" is the best medication for anaphylaxis, only 34.5% knew indications of using adrenaline in children. 48.5% thoroughly understood dietary exclusion. School personnel considered that food allergic students could have social difficulties (10.2%) and/or emotional consequences (37.2%) because of their condition. "Concern" was the emotion that most respondents (66.9%) associated with food allergy. At the end of the course, the number of correct answers to the test increased significantly. Having adequately trained and cooperative school personnel is crucial to significantly reduce emergencies and fatal reactions. The results emphasize the need for specific educational interventions and improvements in school health policies to support schools to deal with allergic students ensuring their safety and psychological well-being.
    11/2013; 3(1):39. DOI:10.1186/2045-7022-3-39
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Food allergy affects up to 10% of preschool children, and continues to increase in prevalence in many countries, resulting in a major public health issue, with practical implications for the food industry, educational establishments and healthcare systems. The need to distinguish between food allergen sensitization and true clinical reactivity remains crucial in diagnosis, often requiring formal food challenge to avoid unnecessary dietary elimination. Epicutaneous exposure in the absence of oral tolerance induction during infancy may be an important risk factor for food allergy. Mounting evidence suggests that for milk and egg allergens, many children are able to tolerate the food when heat-modified, and that this may hasten resolution of the allergy. These developments will hopefully result in a lower adverse impact on quality of life for food-allergic individuals and their families.
    03/2014; 17(3). DOI:10.1097/MCO.0000000000000052
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Food allergy is a common condition for which there are currently no approved treatments except avoidance of the allergenic food and treatment of accidental reactions. There are several potential treatments that are under active investigation in animal and human studies, but it is not yet clear what the best approach may be. Here, we review approaches that are currently in clinical trials, including oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous immunotherapy, immunotherapy combined with anti-IgE, and Chinese herbal medicine as well as approaches that are in preclinical or early clinical investigation, including modified protein immunotherapy, adjuvants, DNA vaccines, and helminth administration. We discuss the importance of fully exploring the risks and benefits of any treatment before it is taken to general clinical practice and the need for clarity about the goals of treatment.
    The Journal of clinical investigation 05/2014; 124(5):1880-1886. DOI:10.1172/JCI72061 · 13.77 Impact Factor
Show more