Hewitt K. Environmental disasters in social context: Toward a preventive and precautionary approach. Natural Hazards

Natural Hazards (Impact Factor: 1.72). 03/2012; 66(1). DOI: 10.1007/s11069-012-0205-6


The paper examines relations between natural hazards and social conditions in disaster, and problems of their integration in disaster management. This must be done against a background of ever-increasing numbers of disasters. The initiating roles and impacts of environmental hazards are acknowledged. However, expanding losses are not explained by increased geophysical risks. To the extent that scientific knowledge or engineering and planning skills are involved, the problems seem more one of (in)effective deployment than major deficiencies. Social analyses suggest the scope of today’s disasters follows primarily from greater concentrations of vulnerable people, exposed in dangerous situations, and lacking adequate protections. Firstly, the question of disaster causality is revisited as a problem of damage diagnostics. A basis is developed from the findings of formal disaster inquiries. Despite their limitations, well-conducted inquiries offer unusually comprehensive anatomies of the social and physical conditions of disasters. They demonstrate and trace out the interplay of environmental, societal, technological, and institutional components of emergencies. In the examples described, environmental hazards are investigated in great detail. Nevertheless, societal preconditions are shown to be more critical. Inadequacies in emergency preparedness, performance, and post-disaster response are highlighted, and for those most at risk. The conclusions present major challenges for the agent-specific view of disasters, and for disaster management preoccupied with natural forces, uncertainty, and emergency responses. Rather, a view of disaster causality emerges emphasizing avoidable failures of preventive, protective, and intervention measures. Evidence is cited to show this is increasingly relevant in so-called natural disasters lacking such inquiries. The discussion considers the relevance of a preventive and precautionary approach in this context. The histories of accident, disease, fire, and crime prevention support arguments for greater attention to context-specific environmental and societal aspects of risk. Aligning disaster management more closely with preventive priorities depends upon a much greater focus on people, places, and livelihoods most at risk, reversing the social processes that put them at risk. It requires listening to their voices and concerns, recognizing and bolstering their resilience. Much more can and should be done to disseminate the protections, from building regulations to insurance, that actually do save so many others in the disasters that happen. As such, the case for greater attention to issues of governance and social justice is strengthened.

Download full-text


Available from: Kenneth Hewitt, Apr 02, 2015
  • Source
    • "Gojalis' economic recovery efforts are shaped by the relative immobilisation produced by the landslide at various scales. Consequently, disaster response and 'resilience' (Hewitt 2013) have included establishing new mobility platforms and practices as income-generating ventures and ways to enable mobility-oriented economic activities. "

    Contemporary South Asia 10/2015; DOI:10.1080/09584935.2015.1090950
  • Source
    • "One notable exception was the report that followed an outbreak of Escherichia coli in the town of Walkerton, Ontario. In this report, numerous human, financial, governance, and technical failings were identified as the cause of the outbreak (O'Connor, 2002; Hewitt, 2013). Despite these findings, and in the months and years following the outbreak in Walkerton, many Canadian jurisdictions continue to focus on adopting more stringent drinking water quality regulations, without including a broader range of conditions. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fundamental to community health and well-being is the capacity to access a sustainable supply of safe drinking water. Small community drinking water systems are the most vulnerable to contamination, and struggle to secure the funds necessary to improve water treatment and delivery systems, and meet increasingly stringent drinking water quality regulations. Little is known of the contextual and cultural differences between communities and the impact this has on regulatory compliance. This study explored the experiences and impact of individual actors within seven small community drinking water systems in locations across Canada. Qualitative, in-person interviews were conducted with water operators, consumers, and decision-makers in each community, and these findings were analysed thematically. Findings from the study show that communities approach and align with compliance challenges in three distinct ways: by adopting regulator-provided or regulator-driven solutions, by adopting an existing improvement framework (i.e. regionalization), or through reinvention to address a new issue or concern. Policy-makers looking to align small communities with appropriate water quality goals may benefit from a consideration of these contextual and cultural differences.
    Water Policy 04/2015; 17(2):349-369. DOI:10.2166/wp.2014.172 · 0.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The ability of a disadvantaged population to recover from an earthquake is impaired by limited economic and political capital (Schmidtlein et al. 2011). Numerous studies examining social vulnerability use quantitative indices, often modelled using census data (Wisner and Luce 1993; Morrow 1999; Delor and Hubert 2000; Lindsay 2003; Few 2007; Hewitt 2013). Most of this literature originates in the USA and thus tends to emphasise the proportion of minority populations as an explanatory variable (Schmidtlein et al. 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Researchers have recently examined the geographic variability of the vulnerability of populations to earthquakes. These studies focus mainly on the complex modelling of geophysical processes or identification of socio-economically disadvantaged populations. However, no studies to date have integrated different components of vulnerability with metrics of travel distance to hospitals and trauma centres (systemic vulnerability). We argue that this previously unaccounted component is an important conceptual and practical aspect of earthquake vulnerability. Accordingly, this paper presents a multi-criteria model for combining physical, social, and systemic components, moving towards a more comprehensive assessment of vulnerability. An analytic hierarchy process is used to produce a place-specific index of social vulnerability, which we combine with soil liquefaction and amplification index and a road network model for access to hospitals and trauma services. Using a geographic information system, we implemented this model for the Greater Victoria region (483 km2, 2011 population: 345,000) in British Columbia, Canada. Clustering of total vulnerability was found in outlying areas, highlighting the importance of access to trauma centres. We conclude by identifying challenges in measuring earthquake vulnerability and advocate integration of systemic vulnerability components in natural hazards research.
    Natural Hazards 11/2014; 74(2). DOI:10.1007/s11069-014-1240-2 · 1.72 Impact Factor
Show more