CARMIL leading edge localization depends on a non-canonical PH domain and dimerization

Department of Physiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 728 Clinical Research Building, 415 Curie Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Nature Communications (Impact Factor: 11.47). 09/2013; 4:2523. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3523
Source: PubMed


CARMIL is an approximately 1,370-amino-acid cytoskeletal scaffold that has crucial roles in cell motility and tissue development through interactions with cytoskeletal effectors and regulation of capping protein at the leading edge. However, the mechanism of CARMIL leading edge localization is unknown. Here we show that CARMIL interacts directly with the plasma membrane through its amino-terminal region. The crystal structure of CARMIL1-668 reveals that this region harbours a non-canonical pleckstrin homology (PH) domain connected to a 16-leucine-rich repeat domain. Lipid binding is mediated by the PH domain, but is further enhanced by a central helical domain. Small-angle X-ray scattering reveals that the helical domain mediates antiparallel dimerization, properly positioning the PH domains for simultaneous membrane interaction. In cells, deletion of the PH domain impairs leading edge localization. The results support a direct membrane-binding mechanism for CARMIL localization at the leading edge, where it regulates cytoskeletal effectors and motility.

13 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although capping protein (CP) terminates actin filament elongation, it promotes Arp2/3-dependent actin network assembly and accelerates actin-based motility both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, capping protein Arp2/3 myosin I linker (CARMIL) antagonizes CP by reducing its affinity for the barbed end and by uncapping CP-capped filaments, whereas the protein V-1/myotrophin sequesters CP in an inactive complex. Previous work showed that CARMIL can readily retrieve CP from the CP:V-1 complex, thereby converting inactive CP into a version with moderate affinity for the barbed end. Here we further clarify the mechanism of this exchange reaction, and we demonstrate that the CP:CARMIL complex created by complex exchange slows the rate of barbed-end elongation by rapidly associating with, and dissociating from, the barbed end. Importantly, the cellular concentrations of V-1 and CP determined here argue that most CP is sequestered by V-1 at steady state in vivo. Finally, we show that CARMIL is recruited to the plasma membrane and only at cell edges undergoing active protrusion. Assuming that CARMIL is active only at this location, our data argue that a large pool of freely diffusing, inactive CP (CP:V-1) feeds, via CARMIL-driven complex exchange, the formation of weak-capping complexes (CP:CARMIL) at the plasma membrane of protruding edges. In vivo, therefore, CARMIL should promote Arp2/3-dependent actin network assembly at the leading edge by promoting barbed-end capping there.
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 04/2014; 111(19). DOI:10.1073/pnas.1313738111 · 9.67 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Leucine rich repeats (LRRs) are present in over 20,000 proteins from viruses to eukaryotes. Most LRR units are 20-30 residues long and can be divided into a highly conserved segment and a variable segment. Eight classes have been recognized. Two to sixty-two units occur in tandem to form an LRR structure. The tertiary structures of these LRRs are helical, in which the β-strands of the highly conserved segments stack in parallel. This helix consists of a super helical arrangement of repeating structural units. We call it a coil of solenoids. We have used our program HELFIT to assign helical parameters to 642 LRRs of known structures of 114 proteins. We report these parameters and their correlations with eight classes of LRR, with the number of repeat units in the LRR, with oligomerization, and with ligand state of the LRR. The helical parameters of the eight LRR classes frequently overlap one another. However, the constant distance between parallel β-strands is the primary determinant of the helical parameters of the LRRs. When the repeat number, n, in LRRs is small, the LRR structures are more variable and, by inference, more flexible. In the LRRs with n ≥ 10, Δz (the rise per repeat unit) of the "RI-like" and "Cysteine-containing" classes is smaller than those of "SDS22-like", and "Plant-specific" classes, This difference is ascribed mainly to the difference in the structural units. The helical parameters of the LRRs unambiguously describe both right handed and left handed helices, helical dimers, and subdomains if they exist. Moreover, the helical parameters sensitively detect structural changes induced by protein, protein interactions, glycosylation, and/or mutation.
    Journal of Proteomics & Bioinformatics 06/2014; 7(6):139-150. DOI:10.4172/jpb.1000314
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Membrane protrusions at the leading edge of cells, known as lamellipodia, drive cell migration in many normal and pathological situations. Lamellipodial protrusion is powered by actin polymerization, which is mediated by the actin-related protein 2/3 (ARP2/3)-induced nucleation of branched actin networks and the elongation of actin filaments. Recently, advances have been made in our understanding of positive and negative ARP2/3 regulators (such as the SCAR/WAVE (SCAR/WASP family verprolin-homologous protein) complex and Arpin, respectively) and of proteins that control actin branch stability (such as glial maturation factor (GMF)) or actin filament elongation (such as ENA/VASP proteins) in lamellipodium dynamics and cell migration. This Review highlights how the balance between actin filament branching and elongation, and between the positive and negative feedback loops that regulate these activities, determines lamellipodial persistence. Importantly, directional persistence, which results from lamellipodial persistence, emerges as a critical factor in steering cell migration.
    Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 08/2014; 15(9):577-90. DOI:10.1038/nrm3861 · 37.81 Impact Factor
Show more

Preview (2 Sources)

13 Reads
Available from