Article

The structure of the COPII transport-vesicle coat assembled on membranes

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology , University of California, Berkeley , Berkeley , United States.
eLife Sciences (Impact Factor: 8.52). 09/2013; 2:e00951. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.00951
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT eLife digest
Proteins often need to move between different compartments within cells. To do this they are packaged into transport pods called vesicles. Many trafficked proteins are synthesized in an organelle called the endoplasmic reticulum, or ER; these proteins are transported away from the ER in ‘COPII’ vesicles, which are formed when the COPII proteins assemble on the ER membrane and force it to bulge outward. The bulge pinches off from the ER membrane, forming the vesicle, which can then move to, and fuse with, a different compartment in the cell.
The COPII proteins assemble in a particular order to form the vesicle—Sar1 inserts into the membrane of the ER; Sec23 and Sec24 form an inner coat and capture the proteins that the vesicle will transport; and Sec13 and Sec31 form an outer coat. Although the structures of the coat proteins are known, how they bind to each other—and to the ER membrane—to form vesicles of many shapes and sizes is less well understood. Now, Zanetti et al. show how the inner and outer coat proteins can interact flexibly to accommodate a variety of cargoes.
Zanetti et al. mixed purified Sar1 and COPII coat proteins with artificial membranes in vitro. As in cells, the proteins assembled a coat on the membranes, creating bulges and vesicles of different shapes. These coats were imaged using an electron microscope, and the images were analysed using computational image-analysis methods. In this way, Zanetti et al. produced a detailed 3D view of the assembled coat.
It was found that the inner and outer proteins each arranged to form lattice structures—like fishing nets—which showed flexibility and variability in the way the individual proteins interact, as well as imperfections in the arrangement. Both coats may help to reshape the membrane, and the inner-coat and outer-coat lattices were also found to move with respect to each other. These flexible properties could allow the coat to assemble on membranes with different shapes and curvatures, forming COPII vesicles with distinct sizes and shapes that can carry a range of cargoes.
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00951.002

2 Followers
 · 
94 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The development of Pichia pastoris as a production platform for recombinant proteins has been a remarkable success story over the last three decades. Stable cheap production processes and the good protein secretion abilities were pacemakers of this development. However, limitations of protein folding, glycosylation or secretion have been identified quite early on. With the availability of genome sequences and the development of systems biology characterization in the last 5 years, remarkable success in strain improvement was achieved. Here, we focus on recent developments of characterization and improvement of P. pastoris production strains regarding protein folding, intracellular trafficking, glycosylation and proteolytic degradation.
    Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 02/2015; 99(7). DOI:10.1007/s00253-015-6470-z · 3.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: ALG-2, a 22-kDa penta-EF-hand protein, is involved in cell death, signal transduction, membrane trafficking, etc., by interacting with various proteins in mammalian cells in a Ca2+-dependent manner. Most known ALG-2-interacting proteins contain proline-rich regions in which either PPYPXnYP (type 1 motif) or PXPGF (type 2 motif) is commonly found. Previous X-ray crystal structural analysis of the complex between ALG-2 and an ALIX peptide revealed that the peptide binds to the two hydrophobic pockets. In the present study, we resolved the crystal structure of the complex between ALG-2 and a peptide of Sec31A (outer shell component of coat complex II, COPII; containing the type 2 motif) and found that the peptide binds to the third hydrophobic pocket (Pocket 3). While amino acid substitution of Phe85, a Pocket 3 residue, with Ala abrogated the interaction with Sec31A, it did not affect the interaction with ALIX. On the other hand, amino acid substitution of Tyr180, a Pocket 1 residue, with Ala caused loss of binding to ALIX, but maintained binding to Sec31A. We conclude that ALG-2 recognizes two types of motifs at different hydrophobic surfaces. Furthermore, based on the results of serial mutational analysis of the ALG-2-binding sites in Sec31A, the type 2 motif was newly defined.
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences 02/2015; 16(2):3677-3699. DOI:10.3390/ijms16023677 · 2.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Eukaryotic protein secretion requires efficient and accurate delivery of diverse secretory and membrane proteins. This process initiates in the ER, where vesicles are sculpted by the essential COPII coat. The Sec13p subunit of the COPII coat contributes to membrane scaffolding, which enforces curvature on the nascent vesicle. A requirement for Sec13p can be bypassed when traffic of lumenally oriented membrane proteins is abrogated. Here we sought to further explore the impact of cargo proteins on vesicle formation. We show that efficient ER export of the p24 family of proteins is a major driver of the requirement for Sec13p. The scaffolding burden presented by the p24 complex is met in part by the cargo adaptor Lst1p, which binds to a subset of cargo, including the p24 proteins. We propose that the scaffolding function of Lst1p is required to generate vesicles that can accommodate difficult cargo proteins that include large oligomeric assemblies and asymmetrically distributed membrane proteins. Vesicles that contain such cargoes are also more dependent on scaffolding by Sec13p, and may serve as a model for large carrier formation in other systems. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Current biology: CB 04/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.029 · 9.92 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
7 Downloads
Available from