Examining classroom influences on student perceptions of school climate: The role of classroom management and exclusionary discipline strategies.

Johns Hopkins Center for the Prevention of Youth Violence, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA.
Journal of school psychology (Impact Factor: 2.31). 10/2013; 51(5):599-610. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.05.005
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT There is growing emphasis on the use of positive behavior supports rather than exclusionary discipline strategies to promote a positive classroom environment. Yet, there has been limited research examining the association between these two different approaches to classroom management and students' perceptions of school climate. Data from 1902 students within 93 classrooms that were nested within 37 elementary schools were examined using multilevel structural equation modeling procedures to investigate the association between two different classroom management strategies (i.e., exclusionary discipline strategies and the use of positive behavior supports) and student ratings of school climate (i.e., fairness, order and discipline, student-teacher relationship, and academic motivation). The analyses indicated that greater use of exclusionary discipline strategies was associated with lower order and discipline scores, whereas greater use of classroom-based positive behavior supports was associated with higher scores on order and discipline, fairness, and student-teacher relationship. These findings suggest that pre-service training and professional development activities should promote teachers' use of positive behavior support strategies and encourage reduced reliance on exclusionary discipline strategies in order to enhance the school climate and conditions for learning.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To examine the effects of improving measurement reliability on associations between risk factors and childhood psychiatric disorder. Data were from a general population sample of parents (N = 211) with children aged 6 to 16 years. Reliability of measurement was improved in three ways: by increasing the number of items in a scale (internal-consistency reliability), by averaging assessments of the same variables collected on two different occasions, and by constructing latent variable measures. To assess the effects of improving reliability, selected risk factors were regressed on parental assessments of childhood oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and overanxious disorder (OAD). Improving reliability led to systematic increases in the magnitude of standardized regression coefficients between family dysfunction and ODD (beta = .30-.51) and between family dysfunction and OAD (beta = .24-.48). In multiple regression, improving reliability served to strengthen the specificity of associations between ODD, OAD, and family dysfunction and maternal depressed mood. Although latent variable methods produced the largest associations, the standard errors of these estimates were also larger, resulting in wider confidence intervals and slightly larger significance values. Improving reliability of measurement results in larger associations between risk factors and childhood disorder and may increase the opportunity of revealing differential associations between variables.
    Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 11/1998; 37(10):1077-84. · 6.97 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies of causal attributions within educational contexts have tended to concentrate on academic performance. There have been a smaller number of investigations of teachers' attributions for pupils' behaviour in school. The present study examines the causal attribution made by pupils for difficult behaviour in classrooms. It reveals the structure of these attributions and serves as a comparison with the teacher studies. The participants were 105 pupils (52 males and 53 females) in the first year of secondary schooling, all drawn from the same inner city school. Four initial small group interviews were used to identify a wide range of factors that pupils viewed as being causes of difficult classroom behaviour in the 18 primary schools they had previously attended. A questionnaire was then constructed incorporating items from these discussions and administered to the whole of the year group of pupils, but omitting the participants in the initial group discussions. The results of a factor analysis indicated that pupils' attributions for misbehaviour at school were best represented by four factors: (1) 'fairness of teacher's actions', (2) 'pupil vulnerability', (3) 'adverse family circumstances' and (4) 'strictness of classroom regime'. While there were no gender differences, pupils saw the 'fairness of teacher's actions' and 'pupil vulnerability' as more significant contributors to pupil misbehaviour than either 'adverse family circumstances' or 'strictness of classroom regime'. The attributions by pupils for difficult classroom behaviour differ markedly from those obtained in studies of teachers. Policy and practice initiatives which do not attend to conflicting attributional styles are unlikely to succeed in improving levels of pupil behaviour in schools.
    British Journal of Educational Psychology 04/2000; 70 ( Pt 1):85-96. · 1.42 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Young people's fears of victimization and feelings of unsafety constitute a serious and pervasive public health problem and appear to be associated with different factors than actual victimization. Our analysis of a population-based telephone survey of youths aged 10-18 years in five economically distressed cities and their suburbs reveals that a substantial minority of youths feel unsafe on any given day, and that an even greater number feel unsafe in school. While some traditional predictors of victimization (such as low socioeconomic status) were associated with feeling unsafe, perceived school disorder was the major factor associated with such feelings. Disorderliness may thus be the school's version of "broken windows," which serve to signal to students a lack of consistent adult concern and oversight that can leave them feeling unsafe. We suggest that fixing the broken windows of school disorderliness may have a significant, positive impact on adolescents' feelings of safety.
    Journal of Urban Health 10/2003; 80(3):400-15. · 1.89 Impact Factor