Noninvasive Vascular Imaging in Abdominal Solid Organ Transplantation

1 All authors: Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, PO Box 800170, University of Virginia Health System, 1215 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA 22908.
American Journal of Roentgenology (Impact Factor: 2.73). 10/2013; 201(4):W544-53. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.13.11306
Source: PubMed


In this article, we focus on the vascular complications related to liver, pancreas, and kidney transplantation.

Long term allograft survival of solid organ transplantation depends on early intervention of complications. Noninvasive imaging with ultrasound, CT, and MRI allows accurate diagnosis of complications and aids in treatment planning.

10 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to compare intraoperative ultrasound and preoperative contrast-enhanced MRI or 64-MDCT for the depiction of malignant lesions and for prediction of hepatic segments positive and negative for malignancy in patients undergoing partial hepatic resection. In this retrospective study, 292 patients undergoing hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer (n = 168), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 70), or other hepatic malignancies (n = 54) were included. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of intraoperative ultrasound and preoperative cross-sectional imaging were calculated. The mean (± SD) time intervals to surgery were 37.6 ± 26 days for 64-MDCT and 48.1 ± 34 days for MRI. Surgical histopathologic examination was the reference standard. Changes in surgical management were recorded. Logistic regression models were used to estimate and compare proportions. For all 561 malignant lesions, the sensitivity of intraoperative ultrasound was 95.1%, compared with 96.8% for 64-MDCT (p = 0.025) and 94.4% for MRI (p = 0.960); 64-MDCT was also more sensitive than intraoperative ultrasound in identifying positive liver segments (p = 0.013). After controlling for patient group and time interval between imaging and surgery, the negative predictive value of 64-MDCT and MRI was higher than that of intraoperative ultrasound (p < 0.001 and p = 0.040, respectively). In only eight cases (2.7%) was surgical management changed after intraoperative ultrasound. For patients undergoing partial liver resection for hepatic malignancies, 64-MDCT and MRI have an equivalent or higher sensitivity in identifying hepatic segments with malignancy, and both 64-MDCT and MRI appear to have a higher predictive value for identifying disease-free segments than does intraoperative ultrasound.
    American Journal of Roentgenology 03/2011; 196(3):562-8. DOI:10.2214/AJR.10.4729 · 2.73 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pancreatic transplantation, performed alone or in conjunction with kidney transplantation, is an effective treatment for advanced type I diabetes mellitus and select patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Following advancements in surgical technique, postoperative management, and immunosuppression, pancreatic transplantation has significantly improved the length and quality of life for patients suffering from pancreatic dysfunction. While computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have more limited utility, ultrasound is the preferred initial imaging modality to evaluate the transplanted pancreas; gray-scale assesses the parenchyma and fluid collections, while Doppler interrogation assesses vascular flow and viability. Ultrasound is also useful to guide percutaneous interventions for the transplanted pancreas. With knowledge of the surgical anatomy and common complications, the abdominal radiologist plays a central role in the perioperative and postoperative evaluation of the transplanted pancreas.
    Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging 12/2014; 24(4):339-349. DOI:10.4103/0971-3026.143896
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A variety of transplants have been performed in the abdomen including liver, kidney, pancreas and islet, bowel, and multivisceral transplants. Imaging plays an important role in graft surveillance particularly to exclude post-transplant complications. When complications occur, therapeutic image-guided interventions are invaluable as these may be graft-saving and even life-saving. Vascular complications following transplantation have been extensively reported in recent reviews. The focus of this review is to discuss post-transplant complications that are primarily extravascular in location. This includes biliary, urological, intestinal, malignancy, infections, and miscellaneous complications. Familiarity with the imaging appearances of these complications is helpful for radiologists as accurate diagnosis and expedient treatment has an impact on graft and patient survival. Copyright © 2015 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Radiology 05/2015; 70(8). DOI:10.1016/j.crad.2015.04.001 · 1.76 Impact Factor
Show more