Conference Paper

Defect Printability Comparing Actinic Printing with Advanced Simulation for EUV masks

DOI: 10.1117/12.2011493 Conference: Proc. of SPIE, Volume: 8679


We describe the printability of native phase defects categorized by type and dimension using NXE3100 EUV scanner and DPS (Defect Printability Simulator) software developed by Luminescent Technologies. The critical dimension (CD) error on wafers simulated by the DPS is strongly affected by the geometry of the multilayer (ML) used as an input parameter for simulation. This finding is supported by cross section images of the ML acquired from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showing that the diameter of the defect and geometry of the ML are closely related. Accordingly, the selection of the type of ML geometry seems to be important in the accuracy of defect printability simulation. The CD error simulated from the DPS using reconstructed ML geometry shows better correspondence with that measured on a wafer than conformal or smoothed ML geometry. The DPS software shows good simulation performance in predicting defect printability at 27nm HP node. This is verified by wafer printing and RCWA simulation.

Download full-text


Available from: Vibhu Jindal, Oct 01, 2015
51 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To support the successful implementation of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography for high volume manufacturing, a spectrum of simulation tools is needed. For investigation of new materials and geometries, rigorous but computationally expensive simulations are required. For faster simulations, a new method, rapid absorber defect interaction computation for advanced lithography (RADICAL), is introduced. RADICAL is a modular program, that uses separate methods to simulate the absorber pattern and defective multilayer. Two different methods are used to simulate the multilayer within RADICAL: ray tracing and single surface approximation (SSA). Ray tracing can accurately simulate arbitrary multilayer geometries. SSA is only accurate for defects shorter than 4.5 nm on the multilayer surface. With ray tracing, RADICAL is nearly 1000 times faster than finite difference time domain (FDTD) for simulating line-space patterns over buried defects. RADICAL with SSA is nearly 25,000 times faster than FDTD. The accuracy of RADICAL is shown to be excellent for simulating defects in focus, and for simulating defects smaller than 2.5 nm through focus. The error can be as high as 4 nm in predicting CD change for larger defects out of focus due to the complexities of modeling the phase of buried defects. But this error is predictable and will likely be acceptable for most applications considering the huge speed advantages of RADICAL. (C) 2009 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. [DOI: 10.1117/1.3152372]
    Journal of Micro/ Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS 07/2009; 8(3). DOI:10.1117/1.3152372 · 1.43 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A linearized, stochastic theory of thin film growth and erosion is presented to describe the evolution of surface roughness in the case of good layer formation far from equilibrium, as is generally found in energetic growth techniques such as ion‐assisted vapor deposition. The variation of the power spectral density and root‐mean‐square roughness is studied for growth on smooth and rough substrates.
    Applied Physics Letters 05/1993; 62(15-62):1745 - 1747. DOI:10.1063/1.109593 · 3.30 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: According to the ITRS roadmap, mask defects are among the top technical challenges to introduction of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography into production. Making a multilayer defect-free extreme ultraviolet (EUV) blank is not possible today, and is unlikely to happen in the next few years. This means that EUV must work with multilayer defects present on the mask. The method proposed by Luminescent is to compensate effects of multilayer defects on images by modifying the absorber patterns. The effect of a multilayer defect is to distort the images of adjacent absorber patterns. Although the defect cannot be repaired, the images may be restored to their desired targets by changing the absorber patterns. This method was introduced in our paper at BACUS 2010, which described a simple pixel-based compensation algorithm using a fast multilayer model. The fast model made it possible to complete the compensation calculations in seconds, instead of days or weeks required for rigorous Finite Domain Time Difference (FDTD) simulations. In this paper the method is extended from one-dimensional to two-dimensional patterns by formulating the problem with level-set methods. Since only the top layer profile is measurable a multi-layer growth model is applied to infer the location of the defect and how it distorts the multi-layer reflector. The fast image model is applied to determine how these assumptions influence accuracy of the compensation method.
    Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering 03/2011; DOI:10.1117/12.879556 · 0.20 Impact Factor