Race/Ethnic Difference in Diabetes and Diabetic Complications.

Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1830 E. Monument St, Ste 333, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
Current Diabetes Reports (Impact Factor: 3.08). 09/2013; 13(6). DOI: 10.1007/s11892-013-0421-9
Source: PubMed


Health disparities in diabetes and its complications and comorbidities exist globally. A recent Endocrine Society Scientific Statement described the Health Disparities in several endocrine disorders, including type 2 diabetes. In this review, we summarize that statement and provide novel updates on race/ethnic differences in children and adults with type 1 diabetes, children with type 2 diabetes, and in Latino subpopulations. We also review race/ethnic differences in the epidemiology of diabetes, prediabetes, and diabetes complications and mortality in the United States and globally. Finally, we discuss biological, behavioral, social, environmental, and health system contributors to diabetes disparities to identify areas for future preventive interventions.

1 Follower
14 Reads

  • Dermatologic clinics 04/2014; 32(2):ix-xii. DOI:10.1016/j.det.2014.01.001 · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Disparate vascular outcomes in diabetes by race and/or ethnicity may reflect differential risk factor control, especially pre-Medicare. Assess concurrent target attainment for glycohemoglobin <7%, non-high density lipoprotein-cholesterol <130 mg/dL, and blood pressure <140/<90 mm Hg in white, black, and Hispanic diabetics <65 years and ≥65 years of age. The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999-2010 data were analyzed on diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetics ≥18 years old. Concurrent target attainment was higher in whites (18.7%) than blacks (13.4% [P = .02] and Hispanics [10.3%, P < .001] <65 years but not ≥65 years of age; 20.0% vs. 15.9% [P = .13], 19.5% [P = .88]). Disparities in health care insurance among younger whites, blacks, and Hispanics, respectively, (87.4% vs. 81.1%, P < .01; 68.0%, P < .001) and infrequent health care (0-1 visits/y; 14.3% vs. 15.0%, P = not significant; 32.0%, P < .001) declined with age. Cholesterol treatment predicted concurrent control in both age groups (multivariable odds ratio >2, P < .001). Risk factor awareness and treatment were lower in Hispanics than whites. When treated, diabetes and hypertension control were greater in whites than blacks or Hispanics. Concurrent risk factor control is low in all diabetics and could improve with greater statin use. Insuring younger adults, especially Hispanic, could raise risk factor awareness and treatment. Improving treatment effectiveness in younger black and Hispanic diabetics could promote equitable risk factor control.
    Journal of the American Society of Hypertension (JASH) 06/2014; 8(6):394-404. DOI:10.1016/j.jash.2014.03.323 · 2.61 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is increasingly common worldwide and is expected to affect 592 million people by 2035. The kidney is often involved. A key goal in treating diabetes is to reduce the risk of development of kidney disease and, if kidney disease is already present, to delay the progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This represents a social and ethical issue, as a significant proportion of patients reaching ESRD in developing countries do not have access to renal replacement therapy. Areas covered: The present review focuses on novel therapeutic approaches for diabetic nephropathy (DN), implemented on the basis of recent insights on its pathophysiology, which might complement the effects of single inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), the cornerstone of renoprotective interventions in diabetes, along with glycemic and blood pressure control. Expert opinion: Although a plethora of new treatment options has arisen from experimental studies, the number of novel renoprotective molecules successfully implemented in clinical practice over the last two decades is disappointingly low. Thus, new investigational strategies and diagnostic tools - including the appropriate choice of relevant renal end points and the study of urinary proteome of patients - will be as important as new therapeutic interventions to fight DN. Finally, in spite of huge financial interests in replacing the less expensive ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers with newer drugs, any future therapeutic approach has to be tested on top of - rather than instead of - optimal RAAS blockade.
    Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs 11/2014; 19(4):1-31. DOI:10.1517/14728214.2014.979151 · 3.06 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications