A phase 1 trial of imatinib, bevacizumab, and metronomic cyclophosphamide in advanced colorectal cancer

Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1600 Divisadero Street, Box 1700, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
British Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.82). 09/2013; 109(7). DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.553
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background:This phase 1 clinical trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics of imatinib, bevacizumab, and metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).Methods:Patients with refractory stage IV CRC were treated with bevacizumab 5 mg kg(-1) i.v. every 2 weeks (fixed dose) plus oral cyclophosphamide q.d. and imatinib q.d. or b.i.d. in 28-day cycles with 3+3 dose escalation. Response was assessed every two cycles. Pharmacokinetics of imatinib and cyclophosphamide and circulating tumour, endothelial, and immune cell subsets were measured.Results:Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Maximum-tolerated doses were cyclophosphamide 50 mg q.d., imatinib 400 mg q.d., and bevacizumab 5 mg kg(-1) i.v. every 2 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included nausea/vomiting, neutropaenia, hyponatraemia, fistula, and haematuria. The DLT window required expansion to 42 days (1.5 cycles) to capture delayed toxicities. Imatinib exposure increased insignificantly after adding cyclophosphamide. Seven patients (20%) experienced stable disease for >6 months. Circulating tumour, endothelial, or immune cells were not associated with progression-free survival.Conclusion:The combination of metronomic cyclophosphamide, imatinib, and bevacizumab is safe and tolerable without significant drug interactions. A subset of patients experienced prolonged stable disease independent of dose level.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication, 10 September 2013; doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.553

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose Significant prolongation of overall survival (OS) has been reached in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment within the last 5-10 years. Our study was conducted in order to evaluate and compare OS of different standard of care treatment options in a university-based outpatient clinic. Methods One hundred and three mCRC patients were identified by retrospective analysis and treated according to available guidelines. OS was analyzed according to the different combinations of first- and second-line treatments. Results mCRC patients revealed an mOS of 34.4 months. Patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) blockade in at least one treatment line showed a significantly longer survival time (p = 0.0056) versus patients without any bevacizumab. No OS differences were detected comparing the different first- and second-line chemotherapy (CTX) strategies in the unselected population. However, wild-type (wt) Kras patients treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy plus CTX in first-line therapy showed significantly longer OS compared to those receiving only additional VEGF inhibition or no targeted therapy (p = 0.0056; mOS 46.8 vs. 20.4 months, respectively). wt Kras patients profited in trend (p = 0.076) from CTX combinations of first-line anti-EGFR followed by second-line anti-VEGF compared to first-line anti-VEGF followed by second-line anti-EGFR (mOS 46.8 vs. 19.2 months, respectively). Conclusions Our results indicate successful allocation of the current mCRC treatment according to the Kras status. Differences in OS of wt Kras patients indicated the further need for randomized trials to define the potential benefit of sequential therapy with EGFR inhibition in first-line therapy followed by VEGFR inhibition vice versa.
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology 09/2014; 141(3). DOI:10.1007/s00432-014-1829-6 · 3.01 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Accumulating evidence suggests that the clinical efficacy of selected anticancer drugs, including conventional chemotherapeutics as well as targeted anticancer agents, originates (at least in part) from their ability to elicit a novel or reinstate a pre-existing tumor-specific immune response. One of the mechanisms whereby chemotherapy can stimulate the immune system to recognize and destroy malignant cells is commonly known as immunogenic cell death (ICD). Cancer cells succumbing to ICD are de facto converted into an anticancer vaccine and as such elicit an adaptive immune response. Several common chemotherapeutics share the ability of triggering ICD, as demonstrated in vaccination experiments relying on immunocompetent mice and syngeneic cancer cells. A large number of ongoing clinical trials involve such ICD inducers, often (but not always) as they are part of the gold standard therapeutic approach against specific neoplasms. In this Trial Watch, we summarize the latest advances on the use of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and mitoxantrone in cancer patients, discussing high-impact studies that have been published during the last 13 months as well as clinical trials that have been initiated in the same period to assess the antineoplastic profile of these immunogenic drugs as off-label therapeutic interventions.
    OncoImmunology 03/2014; 3(1):27878. DOI:10.4161/onci.27878 · 6.28 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Low-dose metronomic (LDM) chemotherapy is a beneficial and very well-tolerated form of chemotherapy utilization characterized by the frequent and uninterrupted administration of low doses of conventional chemotherapeutic agents over prolonged periods of time. While patients resistant to standard maximum tolerated dose (MTD) chemotherapy may still benefit from LDM chemotherapy, there is a lack of predictive markers of response to LDM chemotherapy. We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases for correlative studies conducted as part of LDM chemotherapy trials in order to identify the most promising biomarker candidates. Given the antiangiogenic properties of LDM chemotherapy, angiogenesis-related biomarkers were most commonly studied. However, significant correlations between angiogenesis-related biomarkers and study end points were rare and variable, even so far as biomarkers correlating positively with an end point in some studies and negatively with the same end point in other studies. Pursuing biomarkers outside the angiogenesis field may be more promising.
    Biomarkers in Medicine 07/2014; 8(6):893-911. DOI:10.2217/bmm.14.14 · 2.86 Impact Factor