Risks and safety of pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccine in pregnancy: Exposure prevalence, preterm delivery, and specific birth defects.
ABSTRACT We estimated exposure prevalence and studied potential risks for preterm delivery (PTD) and specific birth defects associated with exposure to the unadjuvanted pH1N1-containing vaccines in the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 influenza seasons. We used data from 4 regional centers in the United States collected as part of the Slone Epidemiology Center's Birth Defects Study. For PTD, propensity score-adjusted time-varying hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for exposure anytime in pregnancy and for each trimester. For 41 specific major birth defects, propensity score-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. Among 4191 subjects, there were 3104 mothers of malformed (cases) and 1087 mothers of nonmalformed (controls). Exposure prevalences among controls were 47% for the 2009-2010 season and 38% for the 2010-2011 season; prevalence varied by geographic region. Results for PTD differed between the two seasons, with risks above and below the null for the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 seasons, respectively. For 41 specific birth defects, most adjusted ORs were close to 1.0. Three defects had adjusted ORs>2.0 and four had risks<0.5; however, 95% CIs for these were wide.
Among women exposed to pH1N1 vaccine, we found a decreased risk for PTD in the 2010-2011 season; risk was increased in 2009-2010, particularly following exposure in the first trimester, though the decrease in gestational length was less than 2 days. For specific major defects, we found no meaningful evidence of increased risk for specific congenital malformations following pH1N1 influenza vaccinations in the 2009-2010 and 2010-2011 seasons.
- SourceAvailable from: Kang Chen[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Infections remain one of the leading causes of morbidity in pregnant women and newborns, with vaccine-preventable infections contributing significantly to the burden of disease. In the past decade, maternal vaccination has emerged as a promising public health strategy to prevent and combat maternal, fetal and neonatal infections. Despite a number of universally recommended maternal vaccines, the development and evaluation of safe and effective maternal vaccines and their wide acceptance are hampered by the lack of thorough understanding of the efficacy and safety in the pregnant women and the offspring.Human Reproduction Update 07/2014; · 8.66 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: To assess risks for acute adverse events and pregnancy complications in pregnant women following monovalent 2009 H1N1 inactivated influenza (MIV) vaccination.Vaccine 07/2014; · 3.49 Impact Factor
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Vaccination during pregnancy with certain vaccines can prevent morbidity and mortality in pregnant women and their infants. However, previous recommendations often focused on the potential risks of vaccines to the fetus when used during pregnancy. In recent years, additional data have become available on the absence of increased risks for adverse events associated with vaccines when administered during pregnancy and on their benefits to mothers and infants. Currently two vaccines - (i) inactivated influenza, and (ii) tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis (Tdap) - are recommended for use by all pregnant women by the United States Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. Here we review the history of vaccination during pregnancy, the current status of recommendations for vaccination during pregnancy in the USA, and the potential for future advances in this area, including key barriers that must be overcome to accommodate these advances.Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 12/2013; · 3.13 Impact Factor