Aortic Root Remodeling and Risk of Heart Failure in the Framingham Heart Study

Preventive Medicine and Cardiology Sections, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
JACC: Heart Failure 02/2013; 1(1):79-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2012.10.003
Source: PubMed


The aim of this study was to investigate the association between aortic root remodeling and incident heart failure (HF).
Age-associated increases in aortic root diameter (AoD) might be associated with arterial stiffening, afterload changes, cardiac remodeling, and the development of HF.
The study sample consisted of participants of the Framingham Heart Study Original and Offspring cohorts who underwent serial echocardiographic measurements of AoD and continuous surveillance for new-onset HF. The AoD was measured at baseline, and the change in AoD between 8-year examination cycles was calculated. Pooled repeated observations (total 13,605 person-observations) in multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to relate baseline AoD and change in AoD to the incidence of HF on follow-up. Models were adjusted for known HF risk factors (age, sex, body mass index, blood pressure, hypertension treatment, diabetes, smoking, prior myocardial infarction, and valve disease).
With adjustment for clinical risk factors, the risk of incident HF increased with greater AoD at baseline (hazard ratio: 1.19/1 SD; 95% confidence interval: 1.07 to 1.33) as well as increases in AoD over 8 years (hazard ratio: 1.20/1 SD; 95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 1.38). The AoD correlated with left ventricular mass (r = 0.50; p < 0.001). After adjustment for left ventricular mass in addition to clinical risk factors, the association of AoD with incident HF was rendered nonsignificant.
Aortic root remodeling is associated with future risk of HF among middle-aged and older adults in the community, potentially because it reflects parallel ventricular-vascular remodeling in those with an enlarged aortic root. Additional studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Download full-text


Available from: Philimon Gona, Sep 11, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aim: Data on the association of aortic root diameter (ARD), as assessed by echocardiography, with incident cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in the general population, are scanty and limited to elderly individuals. Thus, we investigated the value of ARD in predicting cardiovascular events in the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate E Loro Associazioni population. Methods: At entry, 1860 participants (mean age 50 ± 14, 50.6% men) underwent diagnostic tests including laboratory investigations, office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurements (home and 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring), and echocardiography. ARD was measured at the level of Valsalva's sinuses and indexed to body surface area and height. Results: Over a follow-up of 148 months, 137 nonfatal or fatal cardiovascular events were documented. After adjustment for age, sex, BP, fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, smoking status, previous cardiovascular disease, and use of antihypertensive drugs, ARD/height [hazard ratio for 1 unit increase = 2.62, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-5.75, P = 0.01], but not absolute ARD (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% CI 0.89-2.39, P = 0.13) neither ARD/body surface area (hazard ratio 2.09, 95% CI 0.96-4.55, P = 0.06) predicted the increased risk of cardiovascular events. The association between left ventricular hypertrophy and AR dilatation was a stronger predictor of cardiovascular prognosis than left ventricular hypertrophy alone. Conclusions: Our results for the first time show that ARD indexed to height is predictive of incident nonfatal and fatal cardiovascular events among middle-aged individuals in the community and support the view that assessment of ARD in addition to left ventricular mass may refine cardiovascular risk stratification and preventive strategies in the general population.
    Journal of Hypertension 07/2014; 32(9). DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000000264 · 4.72 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study was done to investigate the dynamic changes of the aortic root during systole and diastole in patients with coronary artery calcification (CAC) using dual-source computed tomography (DSCT). We retrospectively analysed 77 consecutive patients who underwent calcium-scoring and angiographic cardiac DSCT. The long- and short-axis dimensions, axis areas of the aortic annulus, sinotubular junction and ascending aorta at the level of the pulmonary trunk in diastole and systole were measured. Average dimensions and relative areal changes between diastole and systole (%RA) of aortic annulus, sinotubular junction and ascending aorta were compared. Systolic and diastolic long- and short-axis dimensions of the aortic annulus in patients with CAC (n = 44) demonstrated statistically significant differences (27.00 ± 2.84 mm vs. 28.04 ± 2.62 mm; P < 0.001; 21.78 ± 2.55 mm vs. 20.88 ± 2.31 mm; P < 0.001), while differences in average diameters and areas of the aortic annulus were nonsignificant (P > 0.586). Systolic and diastolic axial areas of the sinotubular junction in patients with CAC demonstrated significant differences (7.21 ± 1.80 cm(2) vs. 6.92 ± 1.75 cm(2); P < 0.001). The %RA of the ascending aorta in patients with severe CAC (CAC score >400; n = 15) was significantly reduced compared to patients with minimal-to-moderate CAC (CAC score <400; n = 29; 4.77 ± 2.88 vs. 7.51 ± 3.81, P = 0.014). In comparison with patients without CAC, the long- and short-axis dimensions of the aortic annulus and areas of the sinotubular junction show significant differences during the cardiac cycle in patients with CAC. The presence of severe CAC significantly influences the flexibility of the wall of the ascending aorta.
    La radiologia medica 02/2015; 120(7). DOI:10.1007/s11547-015-0503-7 · 1.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Scientific authorities recommend that patients with arterial hypertension should be managed not only on the basis of blood pressure (BP) levels, but also on the assemement of total cardiovascular risk. In particular, evaluation of target organ damage (TOD) is of major relevance for identifying hypertensive individuals at high cardiovascular risk independently of clinic BP levels. Evidence of cardiac and extra-cardiac TOD has been consistently associated with worse cardiovascular prognosis. Unfortunately, detection of TOD markedly depends on sensitivity of diagnostic tools, at difference from evaluation of risk factors and associated diseases, usually reliably provided by accurate clinical examination and routine investigation. The purpose of this paper was to provide an updated, comprehensive review on the role of echocardiography in identifying hypertensive patients apparently uncomplicated, but exposed to a high cardiovascular risk due to the presence of subclinical structural and functional cardiac alterations of adverse prognostic significance.
    High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention 03/2015; 22(2). DOI:10.1007/s40292-015-0079-2
Show more