Does This Patient With Shoulder Pain Have Rotator Cuff Disease? The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 35.29). 08/2013; 310(8):837-47. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.276187
Source: PubMed


Rotator cuff disease (RCD) is the most common cause of shoulder pain seen by physicians.
To perform a meta-analysis to identify the most accurate clinical examination findings for RCD.
Structured search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from their inception through May 2013.
For inclusion, a study must have met the following criteria: (1) description of history taking, physical examination, or clinical tests concerning RCD; (2) detailing of sensitivity and specificity; (3) use of a reference standard with diagnostic criteria prespecified; (4) presentation of original data, or original data could be obtained from the authors; and (5) publication in a language mastered by one of the authors (Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Norwegian, Spanish, Swedish).
Likelihood ratios (LRs) of symptoms and signs of RCD or of a tear, compared with an acceptable reference standard; quality scores assigned using the Rational Clinical Examination score and bias evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.
Twenty-eight studies assessed the examination of referred patients by specialists. Only 5 studies reached Rational Clinical Examination quality scores of level 1-2. The studies with quality scores of level 1-2 included 30 to 203 shoulders with the prevalence of RCD ranging from 33% to 81%. Among pain provocation tests, a positive painful arc test result was the only finding with a positive LR greater than 2.0 for RCD (3.7 [95% CI, 1.9-7.0]), and a normal painful arc test result had the lowest negative LR (0.36 [95% CI, 0.23-0.54]). Among strength tests, a positive external rotation lag test (LR, 7.2 [95% CI, 1.7-31]) and internal rotation lag test (LR, 5.6 [95% CI, 2.6-12]) were the most accurate findings for full-thickness tears. A positive drop arm test result (LR, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.0-11]) might help identify patients with RCD. A normal internal rotation lag test result was most accurate for identifying patients without a full-thickness tear (LR, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.0-0.58]).
Because specialists performed all the clinical maneuvers for RCD in each of the included studies with no finding evaluated in more than 3 studies, the generalizability of the results to a nonreferred population is unknown. A positive painful arc test result and a positive external rotation resistance test result were the most accurate findings for detecting RCD, whereas the presence of a positive lag test (external or internal rotation) result was most accurate for diagnosis of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear.

Download full-text


Available from: Max Reijman, Oct 06, 2015
1 Follower
179 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Shoulder pain is a common symptom in the adult population. The most common cause of shoulder pain is SIS, reflecting a problem with the rotator cuff or subacromial bursa. Determining the cause of a patient’s pain is usually a clinical diagnosis based on careful history taking and physical examination. Limited use of imaging studies will be needed in the setting of trauma, possible glenohumeral arthritis, or when a complete tendon tear is suspected. Therapy is based on pain control and therapeutic exercises in almost all cases. Despite the prevalence of shoulder pain, there is no consensus on the best way to achieve pain control or on the type of exercise most likely to achieve speedy recovery.
    The Medical clinics of North America 05/2014; 98(3):487-504. DOI:10.1016/j.mcna.2014.01.016 · 2.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectif Évaluer la valeur diagnostique des tests cliniques pour tendinopathies dégénératives de la coiffe des rotateurs (TDCR) en pratique médicale. Méthodes Des patients avec TDCR ont été inclus de façon prospective. Onze tests cliniques de la coiffe des rotateurs ont été pratiqués. Un échographiste réalisait les échographies d’épaule en insu. Les résultats échographiques étaient exprimés en tendon normal, tendinopathie et rupture transfixiante. Sensibilité, spécificité, valeurs prédictives positive et négative, exactitude, ratio de vraisemblance (RV) positif et négatif ont été calculés pour chaque test et chaque diagnostic échographique. La valeur diagnostique a été admise à partir d’un RV positif et négatif, ≥ 2 et ≤ 0,5. Résultats Trente-cinq patients et 39 épaules ont été inclus. Le test de Jobe (RV positif: 2,08, RV négatif: 0,31) et le full-can test (2, 0,5), avec pour réponse la faiblesse, atteignaient le seuil de valeur diagnostique pour la rupture du supra-épineux, la rotation latérale en position 1 (2,42, 0,5) pour celle de l’intra-épineux et le lift-off test (8,50, 0,27) pour celle du subscapulaire. Le test de Yergason (3,7, 0,41) atteignait ce seuil pour la tendinopathie du long biceps. Aucun test clinique n’atteignait ce seuil pour les tendinopathies des supra-épineux, infra-épineux et subscapulaire. Conclusions Ce travail montre la valeur diagnostique de 5 des 11 tests cliniques de la coiffe évalués.
    Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 06/2014; 57(4). DOI:10.1016/
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Shoulder pain is a common reason for a patient to see their primary care physician. This article focuses on the evaluation and management of 3 common shoulder disorders; rotator cuff disorders, acromioclavicular joint arthritis, and glenohumeral joint arthritis. The typical history and physical examination findings for each of these entities are highlighted, in addition to treatment options.
    The Medical clinics of North America 07/2014; 98(4). DOI:10.1016/j.mcna.2014.03.004 · 2.61 Impact Factor
Show more