Article

Does This Patient With Shoulder Pain Have Rotator Cuff Disease? The Rational Clinical Examination Systematic Review

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 08/2013; 310(8):837-47. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.276187
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Rotator cuff disease (RCD) is the most common cause of shoulder pain seen by physicians.
To perform a meta-analysis to identify the most accurate clinical examination findings for RCD.
Structured search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL from their inception through May 2013.
For inclusion, a study must have met the following criteria: (1) description of history taking, physical examination, or clinical tests concerning RCD; (2) detailing of sensitivity and specificity; (3) use of a reference standard with diagnostic criteria prespecified; (4) presentation of original data, or original data could be obtained from the authors; and (5) publication in a language mastered by one of the authors (Danish, Dutch, English, French, German, Norwegian, Spanish, Swedish).
Likelihood ratios (LRs) of symptoms and signs of RCD or of a tear, compared with an acceptable reference standard; quality scores assigned using the Rational Clinical Examination score and bias evaluated with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool.
Twenty-eight studies assessed the examination of referred patients by specialists. Only 5 studies reached Rational Clinical Examination quality scores of level 1-2. The studies with quality scores of level 1-2 included 30 to 203 shoulders with the prevalence of RCD ranging from 33% to 81%. Among pain provocation tests, a positive painful arc test result was the only finding with a positive LR greater than 2.0 for RCD (3.7 [95% CI, 1.9-7.0]), and a normal painful arc test result had the lowest negative LR (0.36 [95% CI, 0.23-0.54]). Among strength tests, a positive external rotation lag test (LR, 7.2 [95% CI, 1.7-31]) and internal rotation lag test (LR, 5.6 [95% CI, 2.6-12]) were the most accurate findings for full-thickness tears. A positive drop arm test result (LR, 3.3 [95% CI, 1.0-11]) might help identify patients with RCD. A normal internal rotation lag test result was most accurate for identifying patients without a full-thickness tear (LR, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.0-0.58]).
Because specialists performed all the clinical maneuvers for RCD in each of the included studies with no finding evaluated in more than 3 studies, the generalizability of the results to a nonreferred population is unknown. A positive painful arc test result and a positive external rotation resistance test result were the most accurate findings for detecting RCD, whereas the presence of a positive lag test (external or internal rotation) result was most accurate for diagnosis of a full-thickness rotator cuff tear.

Full-text

Available from: Max Reijman, May 04, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
384 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectif Évaluer la valeur diagnostique des tests cliniques pour tendinopathies dégénératives de la coiffe des rotateurs (TDCR) en pratique médicale. Méthodes Des patients avec TDCR ont été inclus de façon prospective. Onze tests cliniques de la coiffe des rotateurs ont été pratiqués. Un échographiste réalisait les échographies d’épaule en insu. Les résultats échographiques étaient exprimés en tendon normal, tendinopathie et rupture transfixiante. Sensibilité, spécificité, valeurs prédictives positive et négative, exactitude, ratio de vraisemblance (RV) positif et négatif ont été calculés pour chaque test et chaque diagnostic échographique. La valeur diagnostique a été admise à partir d’un RV positif et négatif, ≥ 2 et ≤ 0,5. Résultats Trente-cinq patients et 39 épaules ont été inclus. Le test de Jobe (RV positif: 2,08, RV négatif: 0,31) et le full-can test (2, 0,5), avec pour réponse la faiblesse, atteignaient le seuil de valeur diagnostique pour la rupture du supra-épineux, la rotation latérale en position 1 (2,42, 0,5) pour celle de l’intra-épineux et le lift-off test (8,50, 0,27) pour celle du subscapulaire. Le test de Yergason (3,7, 0,41) atteignait ce seuil pour la tendinopathie du long biceps. Aucun test clinique n’atteignait ce seuil pour les tendinopathies des supra-épineux, infra-épineux et subscapulaire. Conclusions Ce travail montre la valeur diagnostique de 5 des 11 tests cliniques de la coiffe évalués.
    Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 06/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2014.04.001
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Sternoclavicular joint (SCJ) arthropathy is an uncommon cause of mechanical pain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of two active clinical tests for localizing the sternoclavicular joint as the source of mechanical pain. All patients between June 2011 and October 2013 that visited the orthopedic departments of three hospitals with atraumatic pain in the area of the SC joint were evaluated. Local swelling, pain at palpation, pain during arm elevation and two newly described tests (pain during active scapular protraction and retraction) were evaluated. CT images were evaluated. The patients were then divided into two groups according to whether they had a >=50% decrease in pain following the SCJ injection. Sensitivity and specificity for local swelling, the four clinical tests and CT-scan were measured. Forty eight patients were included in this study and SC joint pain was confirmed in 44. The tests with highest sensitivity were pain on palpation, (93% sensitivity) and pain during active scapular protraction (86%). CT-scan showed a sensitivity of 84%. Local swelling showed a high specificity (100%) CONCLUSION: Pain at the SCJ during active scapular protraction is a good clinical diagnostic tool for SC arthropathy.
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 12/2014; 15(1):421. DOI:10.1186/1471-2474-15-421 · 1.90 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background It is unknown which combination of patient information and clinical tests might be optimal for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears. This study aimed to determine the diagnostic value of nine individual clinical tests for evaluating rotator cuff tear and to develop a prediction model for diagnosing rotator cuff tear.Methods This prospective cohort study included 169 patients with shoulder complaints. Patients who reported a previous shoulder dislocation were excluded from the analysis (N¿=¿69). One experienced clinician conducted 25 clinical tests of which 9 are specifically designed to diagnose rotator cuff pathology (empty can, Neer, Hawkins-Kenney, drop arm, lift-off test, painful arc, external rotation lag sign, drop sign, infraspinatus muscle strength test). The final diagnosis, based on magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA), was determined by consensus between the clinician and a radiologist, who were blinded to patient information. A prediction model was developed by logistic regression analysis.Results and discussionIn this cohort, 38 patients were diagnosed with rotator cuff tears. The individual overall accuracy of the rotator cuff clinical tests was 61%¿75%. After backward selection, the model determined that the most important predictors of rotator cuff tears were higher age and a positive Neer test. This internally validated prediction model had good discriminative ability (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)¿=¿0.73).Conclusion Our results showed that individual clinical shoulder tests had moderate diagnostic value for diagnosing rotator cuff tear. Our prediction model showed improved diagnostic value. However, the prediction value is still relatively low, supporting a low threshold for additional diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.Level of evidenceStudy of diagnostic test: level I.
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 08/2014; 9(1):70. DOI:10.1186/s13018-014-0070-y · 1.58 Impact Factor