Cognitive emotion regulation fails the stress test

Psychology Department and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Impact Factor: 9.81). 08/2013; 110(37). DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1305706110
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Cognitive emotion regulation has been widely shown in the laboratory to be an effective way to alter the nature of emotional responses. Despite its success in experimental contexts, however, we often fail to use these strategies in everyday life where stress is pervasive. The successful execution of cognitive regulation relies on intact executive functioning and engagement of the prefrontal cortex, both of which are rapidly impaired by the deleterious effects of stress. Because it is specifically under stressful conditions that we may benefit most from such deliberate forms of emotion regulation, we tested the efficacy of cognitive regulation after stress exposure. Participants first underwent fear-conditioning, where they learned that one stimulus (CS+) predicted an aversive outcome but another predicted a neutral outcome (CS-). Cognitive regulation training directly followed where participants were taught to regulate fear responses to the aversive stimulus. The next day, participants underwent an acute stress induction or a control task before repeating the fear-conditioning task using these newly acquired regulation skills. Skin conductance served as an index of fear arousal, and salivary α-amylase and cortisol concentrations were assayed as neuroendocrine markers of stress response. Although groups showed no differences in fear arousal during initial fear learning, nonstressed participants demonstrated robust fear reduction following regulation training, whereas stressed participants showed no such reduction. Our results suggest that stress markedly impairs the cognitive regulation of emotion and highlights critical limitations of this technique to control affective responses under stress.

Download full-text


Available from: Ashley A Shurick, Aug 09, 2015
  • Source
    • "Based on this research, a recent study in our laboratory tested the hypothesis that cognitive emotion regulation would be impaired after exposure to stress (Raio et al., 2013). After a fearconditioning task where physiological arousal was measured as an index of fear, participants were trained to re-appraise an aversive CS and re-structure the fear-conditioning task overall in a less threatening manner. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Fear learning and regulation is as a prominent model for describing the pathogenesis of anxiety disorders and stress-related psychopathology. Fear expression can be modulated using a number of regulatory strategies, including extinction, cognitive emotion regulation, avoidance strategies and reconsolidation. In this review, we examine research investigating the effects of acute stress and stress hormones on these regulatory techniques. We focus on what is known about the impact of stress on the ability to flexibly regulate fear responses that are acquired through Pavlovian fear conditioning. Our primary aim is to explore the impact of stress on fear regulation in humans. Given this, we focus on techniques where stress has been linked to alterations of fear regulation in humans (extinction and emotion regulation), and briefly discuss other techniques (avoidance and reconsolidation) where the impact of stress or stress hormones have been mainly explored in animal models. These investigations reveal that acute stress may impair the persistent inhibition of fear, presumably by altering prefrontal cortex function. Characterizing the effects of stress on fear regulation is critical for understanding the boundaries within which existing regulation strategies are viable in everyday life and can better inform treatment options for those who suffer from anxiety and stress-related psychopathology.
    01/2015; 1:134-146. DOI:10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.11.004
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the prevalent view of emotion and decision making is derived from the notion that there are dual systems of emotion and reason, a modulatory relationship more accurately reflects the current research in affective neuroscience and neuroeconomics. Studies show two potential mechanisms for affect's modulation of the computation of subjective value and decisions. Incidental affective states may carry over to the assessment of subjective value and the decision, and emotional reactions to the choice may be incorporated into the value calculation. In addition, this modulatory relationship is reciprocal: Changing emotion can change choices. This research suggests that the neural mechanisms mediating the relation between affect and choice vary depending on which affective component is engaged and which decision variables are assessed. We suggest that a detailed and nuanced understanding of emotion and decision making requires characterizing the multiple modulatory neural circuits underlying the different means by which emotion and affect can influence choices. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Neuroscience Volume 37 is July 08, 2014. Please see for revised estimates.
    Annual Review of Neuroscience 07/2013; 37. DOI:10.1146/annurev-neuro-071013-014119 · 22.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and purpose Chronic stress leads to deficits in executive functions; its effect on cognitive emotion regulation is yet to be investigated. The present study explored the possible role of cognitive emotion regulation strategies in mediating the well-established association between perceived stress and anxiety. We assumed that stress leads (via impaired prefrontal activity and executive functions) to reduced use of executive strategies and increased use of non-executive strategies, resulting in higher levels of anxiety. Methods A cross-sectional sample of 162 university students completed the Perceived Stress Scale, the Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Results Multiple mediation analysis resulted in a significant model, in which cognitive emotion regulation strategies mediated the effect of perceived stress on anxiety (Adjusted R2=.68, F(12,149)=29.30, p<.001, Effect ratio=.22). Specifically, greater stress was found to be uniquely related to increased use of non-executive strategies (self-blame, rumination and catastrophizing), and decreased use of cognitive strategies involving executive functions (positive reappraisal and putting into perspective). Greater use of non-executive strategies and reduced use of executive strategies (except for putting into perspective) was in turn found to be associated with higher levels of anxiety. Conclusions These results seem to suggest that under stressful conditions — precisely when control is most needed — cognitive regulation may be ineffective in controlling emotional responses. Implications for preventing the negative effects of stress are highlighted.
    Translational Neuroscience 03/2014; 5(1):64-71. DOI:10.2478/s13380-014-0207-9 · 0.72 Impact Factor
Show more