Hospital readmission and parent perceptions of their child's hospital discharge

1Division of General Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
International Journal for Quality in Health Care (Impact Factor: 1.76). 08/2013; 25(5). DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzt051
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT /st>To describe parent perceptions of their child's hospital discharge and assess the relationship between these perceptions and hospital readmission.
/st>A prospective study of parents surveyed with questions adapted from the care transitions measure, an adult survey that assesses components of discharge care. Participant answers, scored on a 5-point Likert scale, were compared between children who did and did not experience a readmission using a Fisher's exact test and logistic regression that accounted for patient characteristics associated with increased readmission risk, including complex chronic condition and assistance with medical technology.
/st>A tertiary-care children's hospital.
A total of 348 parents surveyed following their child's hospital discharge between March and October 2010.
/st>Unplanned readmission within 30 days of discharge.
/st>There were 28 children (8.1%) who experienced a readmission. Children had a lower readmission rate (4.4 vs. 11.3%, P = 0.004) and lower adjusted readmission likelihood [odds ratio 0.2 (95% confidence interval 0.1, 0.6)] when their parents strongly agreed (n = 206) with the statement, 'I felt that my child was healthy enough to leave the hospital' from the index admission. Parent perceptions relating to care management responsibilities, medications, written discharge plan, warning signs and symptoms to watch for and primary care follow-up were not associated with readmission risk in multivariate analysis.
/st>Parent perception of their child's health at discharge was associated with the risk of a subsequent, unplanned readmission. Addressing concerns with this perception prior to hospital discharge may help mitigate readmission risk in children.

Download full-text


Available from: Richard C Antonelli, Feb 10, 2015
31 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To assess readmission rates identified by 3M-Potentially Preventable Readmissions software (3M-PPRs) in a national cohort of children's hospitals. Study design: A total of 1 719 617 hospitalizations for 1 531 828 unique patients in 58 children's hospitals from 2009 to 2011 from the Children's Hospital Association Case-Mix Comparative database were examined. Main outcome measures included rates, diagnoses, and costs of potentially preventable readmissions (PPRs) and all-cause readmissions. Results: The 7-, 15-, and 30-day rates by 3M-PPRs were 2.5%, 4.1%, and 6.2%, respectively. Corresponding all-cause readmission rates were 5.0%, 8.7%, and 13.3%. At 30 days, 60.6% of all-cause readmissions were considered nonpreventable by 3M-PPRs, more than one-half of which were related to malignancies. The percentage of readmissions rated as potentially preventable was similar at all 3 time intervals. Readmissions after chemotherapy, acute leukemia, and cystic fibrosis were all considered nonpreventable, and at least 80% of readmissions after index admissions for sickle cell crisis, bronchiolitis, ventricular shunt procedures, asthma, and appendectomy were designated potentially preventable. Total costs for all readmissions were $1.7 billion; PPRs accounted for 27.3% of these costs. The most costly readmissions were associated with ventricular shunt procedures ($26.5 million/year), seizures ($15.5 million/year), and sickle cell crisis ($15.0 million/year). Conclusions: Rates of PPRs were significantly lower than all-cause readmission rates more than one-half of which were caused by exclusion of malignancies. Annual costs of PPRs, although significant in the aggregate, appear to represent a much smaller cost-savings opportunity for children than for adults. Our study may help guide children's hospitals to focus readmission reduction strategies on areas where the financial vulnerability is greatest based on 3M-PPRs.
    2013 American Academy of Pediatrics National Conference and Exhibition; 10/2013
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Reducing avoidable readmission and posthospitalization emergency department (ED) utilization has become a focus of quality-of-care measures and initiatives. For pediatric patients, no systematic efforts have assessed the evidence for interventions to reduce these events. We sought to synthesize existing evidence on pediatric discharge practices and interventions to reduce hospital readmission and posthospitalization ED utilization. PubMed and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. Studies available in English involving pediatric inpatient discharge interventions with at least 1 outcome of interest were included. We utilized a modified Cochrane Good Practice data extraction tool and assessed study quality with the Downs and Black tool. Our search identified a total of 1296 studies, 14 of which met full inclusion criteria. All included studies examined multifaceted discharge interventions initiated in the inpatient setting. Overall, 2 studies demonstrated statistically significant reductions in both readmissions and subsequent ED visits, 4 studies demonstrated statistically significant reductions in either readmissions or ED visits, and 2 studies found statistically significant increases in subsequent utilization. Several studies were not sufficiently powered to detect changes in either subsequent utilization outcome measure. Interventions that demonstrated reductions in subsequent utilization targeted children with specific chronic conditions, providing enhanced inpatient feedback and education reinforced with postdischarge support. Interventions seeking to reduce subsequent utilization should identify an individual or team to assume responsibility for the inpatient-to-outpatient transition and offer ongoing support to the family via telephone or home visitation following discharge. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2013;. © 2013 Society of Hospital Medicine.
    Journal of Hospital Medicine 04/2014; 9(4). DOI:10.1002/jhm.2134 · 2.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: AimExtremely premature infants experience long hospitalisation and high readmission rates within 30 days of discharge. This quality control investigation retrospectively explored the impact of the Creating Opportunities for Parent Empowerment (COPE©) Programme on these rates in an all referral, Level-IV small baby intensive care unit setting.Methods The parents of 303 extremely premature infants participated in the study. Of those, 135 were admitted before the implementation of COPE© and served as baseline historical controls and the remaining 168 neonates received the intervention. Length of stay and readmission rates were analysed using parametric and nonparametric tests. Additional analyses were used to compare the two groups in terms of gestational age, birthweight, and other acuity measures.ResultsNeonates who received COPE© required significantly reduced lengths of stay than the control neonates (COPE© 127.1 ± 55.8 days versus control 139.6 ± 61.9 days, p < 0.05) and significantly lower readmission rates (COPE© 23.9% versus control 13.2%, p=0.05).Conclusion The COPE© Programme promoted active parental engagement in the unit and significantly reduced hospital stays and readmission rates. Future interventions should identify the specific components of the Programme that support the parents of extremely premature infants during the various phases of hospitalisation.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Acta Paediatrica 04/2014; 103(7). DOI:10.1111/apa.12669 · 1.67 Impact Factor
Show more