Article

Impact of palm, mustard, waste cooking oil and Calophyllum inophyllum biofuels on performance and emission of CI engine

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (Impact Factor: 5.51). 11/2013; 27:664-682. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.059

ABSTRACT Present energy situation of the world is unsustainable due to unequal geographical distribution of natural wealth as well as environmental, geopolitical and economical concerns. Ever increasing drift of energy consumption due to growth of population, transportation and luxurious lifestyle has motivated researchers to carry out research on biofuels as a sustainable alternative fuel for diesel engine. Renewability, cost effectiveness and reduction of pollutants in exhaust gas emission are promoting biofuels as a suitable substitute of diesel fuel in near future. This paper reviews the suitability of feedstock and comparative performance and emission of palm, mustard, waste cooking oil (WCO) and Calophyllum inophyllum biofuels with respect to diesel fuel from various recent publications. Probable analysis of performance and emission of biofuel is also included in further discussion. Palm oil has versatile qualities in terms of productivity, oil yield and land utilization. But tremendous demand of edible oil is motivating the use of non-edible vegetable oils as biofuel feedstock. Mustard oil is a promising new biofuel especially regarding NOx reduction. WCO is one of the most economic sources of biofuel which efficiently helps in liquid waste management and prevents recycling of used oil, injurious to human health. C. inophyllum is completely non-edible and trans-esterified oil shows similar engine performance and emission characteristics like other biofuels. Limited data were published regarding mustard and C. inophyllum as their use as biofuel is still in primary state compared to palm or WCO. Therefore, in depth research needs to be carried out on these two oils to use them effectively as alternative fuels.

5 Followers
 · 
490 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biofuel Energy scenario First generation biofuel Second generation biofuel World biofuel scenario Biofuel supply chain a b s t r a c t The prospect of biofuels as a transport alternative fuel in Australia is reviewed and discussed in this paper. The Australian transport sector is the second largest energy consuming sector which consumes about 24% of total energy consumption. A part of this energy demand can be met by ecofriendly biofuels. A wide array of different biofuels feedstocks including Australian native species, their distributions, oil content, traditional uses are reviewed and listed in the descending order of their oil content. The world biofuel scenario as well as the 20 largest biofuel production countries and their mandates on biofuels blending with petroleum diesel are presented. Australia's biofuel production, consumption, production facilities and future investment projects are also reviewed and discussed. The study developed a biofuel supply chain for Australia and found that the second generation biofuels have better prospects as a future alternative transport fuel in Australia. These biofuel feedstocks are readily available and can overcome the shortcomings of the first generation biofuels, such as socio-economic, environmental and food versus land use challenges. Although some research is in progress, further study is needed on the process development of second generation biofuel production at commercial scale in Australia and abroad.
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 03/2015; 43:331-351. DOI:10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.047 · 5.51 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The second generation (2G) biofuels are produced from non-edible feedstocks such as waste vegetable oils and fats, non-food crops, forestry residues, various types of biomass sources. The 2G biofuels are not being produced commercially yet in Australia because it requires more sophisticated processing equipment, more investment per unit fuel production and large scale facilities than the first generation (1G) biofuel. However, 2G biofuel can overcome the social, economic and environmental challenges without hampering our food cost and creating pressure on land use because it is non-edible, biodegradable and can grow on marginal land. The literatures on non-edible energy resources and their biofuel production facilities and present status are reviewed in this paper. The 2G biofuels market status, future plans, government initiatives for 2G biofuel production and technological developments are presented and discussed. Twenty five species available in Australia are selected from the literatures and their oil yield, fuel characteristics; physical and chemical properties are described. Australia's biofuel supply chain nexus from producers to customers is developed where the elements namely primary resources, secondary resources, development and production projects, processing, transport and storage, and finally end user or customer are considered as the main part for the supply chain construction. Although, some research are available on 2G biofuel production, further study using an appropriate supply chain with respect to given feed stocks is needed for producing 2G biofuel in a commercial scale in Australia.
    The 9th International Green Energy Conference, Tianjin, China; 05/2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mustard biodiesel was produced from waste mustard oil and physicochemical properties were investigated. MB showed superior calorific value (40.404 MJ/kg), oxidation stability (15.92 h), cloud point (5 °C) and pour point (-18 °C) than any other conventional biodiesels. During engine performance test MB10 and MB20 showed 8-13% higher BSFC and 5-6% lower BTE compared to B0. By contrast, MB blends produced 7-8% less BP and 6-8% less engine torque compared to B0. Engine emission and noise test showed 9-12% higher NO, 24-42% lower HC, 19-40% lower CO and 2-7% lower noise emission for MB blends compared to B0. Besides, comparable engine performance and emission characteristics were found for MB10 and MB20 compared to PB10 and PB20 respectively.
    Procedia Engineering 12/2014; 10. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.868

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
254 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014