Article

Human-relevant levels of added sugar consumption increase female mortality and lower male fitness in mice.

Department of Biology, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, USA.
Nature Communications (Impact Factor: 10.74). 08/2013; 4:2245. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3245
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Consumption of added sugar has increased over recent decades and is correlated with numerous diseases. Rodent models have elucidated mechanisms of toxicity, but only at concentrations beyond typical human exposure. Here we show that comparatively low levels of added sugar consumption have substantial negative effects on mouse survival, competitive ability, and reproduction. Using Organismal Performance Assays-in which mice fed human-relevant concentrations of added sugar (25% kcal from a mixture of fructose and glucose, modeling high fructose corn syrup) and control mice compete in seminatural enclosures for territories, resources and mates-we demonstrate that fructose/glucose-fed females experience a twofold increase in mortality while fructose/glucose-fed males control 26% fewer territories and produce 25% less offspring. These findings represent the lowest level of sugar consumption shown to adversely affect mammalian health. Clinical defects of fructose/glucose-fed mice were decreased glucose clearance and increased fasting cholesterol. Our data highlight that physiological adversity can exist when clinical disruptions are minor, and suggest that Organismal Performance Assays represent a promising technique for unmasking negative effects of toxicants.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Amanda K Suchy, Mar 03, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
76 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Is consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) associated with semen quality? Higher consumption of SSB was associated with lower sperm motility among healthy, young men. The existing literature on the potential role of SSBs on male reproductive function is scarce and primarily focused on the relation between caffeinated beverages and semen quality. However, a rodent model suggests that SSBs may hamper male fertility. The Rochester Young Men's Study; a cross-sectional study of 189 healthy young men carried out at the University of Rochester during 2009-2010. Men aged 18-22 years provided semen and blood samples, underwent a physical examination and completed a previously validated food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Linear regression was used to analyze the association of SSBs with sperm parameters and reproductive hormone levels while adjusting for potential confounders. SSB intake was inversely related to progressive sperm motility. Men in the highest quartile of SSB intake (≥1.3 serving/day) had 9.8 (95% CI: 1.9,17.8) percentage units lower progressive sperm motility than men in the lowest quartile of intake (<0.2 serving/day) (P, trend = 0.03). This association was stronger among lean men (P, trend = 0.005) but absent among overweight or obese men (P, trend = 0.98). SSB intake was unrelated to other semen quality parameters or reproductive hormones levels. As in all cross-sectional studies, causal inference is limited. An additional problem is that only single semen sample was obtained from each subject. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the relation between SSB intake and low semen quality beyond the contribution of caffeinated beverages. While our findings are in agreement with recent experimental data in rodents, more studies are required to draw conclusions on the relation of SSB with semen quality or male infertility. Supported by the European Union Seventh Framework Program (Environment), 'Developmental Effects of Environment on Reproductive Health' (DEER) grant 212844. Grant P30 DK046200 and Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award T32 DK007703-16 and T32HD060454 from the National Institutes of Health. None of the authors has any conflicts of interest to declare.
    Human Reproduction 05/2014; 29(7). DOI:10.1093/humrep/deu102 · 4.59 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The pronounced global rise in sugar consumption in recent years has been driven largely by increased consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages. Although high sugar intakes are recognised as increasing the risk of obesity and related metabolic disturbances, less is known about how sugar might also impair cognition and learned behaviour. This review considers the effects of sugar in rodents on measures of learning and memory; reward processing, anxiety and mood. The parallels between sugar consumption and addictive behaviours are also discussed. The available evidence clearly indicates that sugar consumption can induce cognitive dysfunction. Deficits have been found most consistently on tasks measuring spatial learning and memory. Younger animals appear to be particularly sensitive to the effects of sugar on reward processing, yet results vary according to what reward-related behaviour is assessed. Sugar does not appear to produce long-term effects on anxiety or mood. Importantly, cognitive impairments have been found when intake approximates levels of sugar consumption in people and without changes to weight gain. There remain several caveats when extrapolating from animal models to putative effects of sugar on cognitive function in people. These issues are discussed in conjunction with potential underlying neural mechanisms and directions for future research.
    Appetite 05/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2014.04.028 · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Potential impacts of genetically modified (GM) animals in natural environments are explored in a framework of regulatory evolution. Transgenic growth hormone animals express remarkable alterations and plasticity in development, physiology and behavior in response to environmental factors (nutrition, temperature, photoperiod), suggesting that standard laboratory assessments are likely to underestimate their evolutionary potential. Sexual selection is examined in the context of female self-referent appraisal of male fitness that reflects performance in the species-specific niche. Wild-type females may recognize and discriminate against GM males (the Transparent Genome Hypothesis) but if accepted as mates, pleiotropic disruption associated with GMs may reduce fitness of the natural population (the Trojan Gene Hypothesis). Alternatively, facilitation of regulatory evolution by sexual reproduction (recombination and segregation) may derive modifier selection, masking, integration, or niche shifts. Other aspects explored include mutation theory, purging, pleiotropy, epigenetics and plasticity, behavior and the Bruce effect, and mismatch of genetic or epigenetic background between GM stock and natural populations.
    Evolutionary Biology 09/2014; 41(3). DOI:10.1007/s11692-014-9276-5 · 3.27 Impact Factor