Article

It Takes Some Effort: How Minimal Physical Effort Reduces Consumption Volume.

Bern University of Applied Sciences, HAFL, Food Science & Management, Laenggasse 85, CH-3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland.
Appetite (Impact Factor: 2.52). 08/2013; DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.07.014
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Plenty of studies have demonstrated that effort influences food choice. However, few have been conducted to analyze the effect of effort on consumption volume. Moreover, the few studies that have measured consumption volume all have strong limitations. The goal of the present paper is to disentangle confounding variables in earlier research and to rule out various alternative explanations. In a tasting setting focusing on snacking behavior, either unwrapping a food product or grabbing it with sugar tongs was enough to significantly reduce consumption, regardless of whether an unhealthy or healthy food item was used. Hardly any cognitive resources seem to be necessary for the effect to occur, as cognitive load did not affect the findings. In light of obesity being a pressing concern, these findings might be valuable for individuals as well as for the food industry.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
328 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Offered aluminum-foil-wrapped or unwrapped food (chocolates and cashews) to 62 obese and 64 normal undergraduates to investigate the effects of past experience on the willingness to work for food. The results show that neither obesity nor the unwrapping manipulation had an effect on the consumption of chocolates. Wrapping, however, produced a significant effect on cashew consumption-obese Ss ate fewer cashews if they were wrapped, while normal Ss ate about the same number of wrapped and unwrapped cashews. It appears that the willingness to work for food in obese humans depends on training and testing conditions. Obese humans are less motivated only when they must work harder than they are accustomed to obtain food. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved)
    Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology 04/1974; 86(3):503-8. · 1.96 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A set of naturalistic observations was conducted to examine Schachter's theory that obese individuals are more responsive to external food cues than persons of normal weight. During six days of observation at a large hospital cafeteria, experimenters manipulated the accessibility of high- and low-calorie desserts. No differences in selection by obese, overweight, and normal-weight individuals of meals or desserts were observed. All weight groups were equally responsive to the experimental manipulation of food cues.
    Archives of General Psychiatry 11/1980; 37(10):1133-5. · 13.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1. It has been suggested that obese subjects have a greater relative preference for palatable foods than lean subjects. 2. The food intake of eight obese subjects was measured using an automated food dispensing machine. 3. Subjects ate ad libitum for the first three days from a range of acceptable foods predetermined by questionnaire. 4. On the next three days the food which subjects chose most frequently ('palatable' food) was priced at a level such that if the subjects maintained their intake of that food they were forced to reduce their total energy intake by 50 per cent, but the subjects were able to obtain food sufficient to maintain their energy intake only if they ate exclusively food rated as 'ordinary'. 5. On this differential fixed price schedule the obese subjects reduced total energy intake to a small extent (20 per cent) whereas their intake of palatable food was reduced to a larger extent (65 per cent). Thus obese subjects relatively defended energy intake at the expense of palatability. Hunger and appetite ratings did not differ from each other throughout the study.
    International Journal of Obesity 02/1982; 6(2):153-64. · 5.39 Impact Factor