Genetics in Population Health Science: Strategies and Opportunities.

Daniel W. Belsky is with the Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, and the Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC. Terrie E. Moffitt and Avshalom Caspi are with the Institute for Genome Sciences and Policy, Duke University and the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, the Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, and the Social, Genetic, and Developmental Psychiatry Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College London, London, UK.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.23). 08/2013; DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301139
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Translational research is needed to leverage discoveries from the frontiers of genome science to improve public health. So far, public health researchers have largely ignored genetic discoveries, and geneticists have ignored important aspects of population health science. This mutual neglect should end. In this article, we discuss 3 areas where public health researchers can help to advance translation: (1) risk assessment: investigate genetic profiles as components in composite risk assessments; (2) targeted intervention: conduct life-course longitudinal studies to understand when genetic risks manifest in development and whether intervention during sensitive periods can have lasting effects; and (3) improved understanding of environmental causation: collaborate with geneticists on gene-environment interaction research. We illustrate with examples from our own research on obesity and smoking. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print August 8, 2013: e1-e11. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.301139).

1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The sequencing of the human genome and the advent of low-cost genome-wide assays that generate millions of observations of individual genomes in a matter of hours constitute a disruptive innovation for social science. Many public use social science datasets have or will soon add genome-wide genetic data. With these new data come technical challenges, but also new possibilities. Among these, the lowest-hanging fruit and the most potentially disruptive to existing research programs is the ability to measure previously invisible contours of health and disease risk within populations. In this article, we outline why now is the time for social scientists to bring genetics into their research programs. We discuss how to select genetic variants to study. We explain how the polygenic architecture of complex traits and the low penetrance of individual genetic loci pose challenges to research integrating genetics and social science. We introduce genetic risk scores as a method of addressing these challenges and provide guidance on how genetic risk scores can be constructed. We conclude by outlining research questions that are ripe for social science inquiry.
    Biodemography and Social Biology 10/2014; 60(2):137-55. DOI:10.1080/19485565.2014.946591 · 1.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: To test transethnic replication of a genetic risk score for obesity in white and black young adults using a national sample with longitudinal data. Design and Methods: A prospective longitudinal study using the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health Sibling Pairs (n = 1,303). Obesity phenotypes were measured from anthropometric assessments when study members were aged 18-26 and again when they were 24-32. Genetic risk scores were computed based on published genome-wide association study discoveries for obesity. Analyses tested genetic associations with body-mass index (BMI), waist-height ratio, obesity, and change in BMI over time. Results: White and black young adults with higher genetic risk scores had higher BMI and waist-height ratio and were more likely to be obese compared to lower genetic risk age-peers. Sibling analyses revealed that the genetic risk score was predictive of BMI net of risk factors shared by siblings. In white young adults only, higher genetic risk predicted increased risk of becoming obese during the study period. In black young adults, genetic risk scores constructed using loci identified in European and African American samples had similar predictive power. Conclusion: Cumulative information across the human genome can be used to characterize individual level risk for obesity. Measured genetic risk accounts for only a small amount of total variation in BMI among white and black young adults. Future research is needed to identify modifiable environmental exposures that amplify or mitigate genetic risk for elevated BMI.
    PLoS ONE 07/2014; 9(7):e101596. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0101596 · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The genetic epidemiology of psychiatric disorders is undergoing a sea change. The flood of genome-wide association studies (GWAS) enabled by the advent of low-cost, high throughput genotyping and the emergence of global consortia to harness the combined power of genome wide data on tens of thousands of individuals is now producing a large volume of discoveries. With these discoveries, hypothesis-free methods of uncovering the genetic roots of psychiatric disorder are overtaking traditional hypothesis-driven approaches. What this transition means for research on gene-environment interactions (GxE) is hotly debated [1–5]. Uher’s review [6] addresses some of the contours of this debate. Here we seek to contextualize and expand on his points. Our goal is to make some sense of the ongoing conflict in psychiatric genetics between hypothesis-driven genetic research focused on candidate systems and hypothesis-free genetic research focused on data mining of the genome. We think part of the reas
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 09/2014; 49(10). DOI:10.1007/s00127-014-0954-5 · 2.58 Impact Factor


Available from
May 27, 2014