Protein array-based profiling of CSF identifies RBPJ as an autoantigen in multiple sclerosis

Interdepartmental Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics (S.H.K.), Yale University, New Haven, CT
Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.29). 08/2013; 81(11). DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a43b48
Source: PubMed


To profile the reactivity of CSF-derived immunoglobulin from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) against a large panel of antigens, to identify disease-specific reactivities.
CSF from subjects with MS with elevated immunoglobulin G and CSF from control subjects presenting with other inflammatory neurologic disease were screened against a protein array consisting of 9,393 proteins. Reactivity to a candidate protein identified using these arrays was confirmed with ELISA and immunocytochemistry.
Autoantibodies against one protein on the array, recombination signal binding protein for immunoglobulin kappa J region (RBPJ), discriminated between patients with MS and controls (p = 0.0052). Using a large validation cohort, we found a higher prevalence of autoantibodies against RBPJ in the CSF of patients with MS (12.5%) compared with the CSF of patients with other neurologic diseases (1.6%; p = 0.02) by ELISA. This difference in reactivity was restricted to the CSF as serum reactivity against RBPJ did not differ between patients and controls. The presence of CSF autoantibodies against RBPJ was further confirmed by immunocytochemistry.
These data indicate that RBPJ, a ubiquitous protein of the Notch signaling pathway that plays an important role in Epstein-Barr virus infection, is a novel MS autoantigen candidate that is recognized by CSF-derived immunoglobulin G in a subset of patients with MS.

Download full-text


Available from: Luis Querol,
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory demyelinating disease of the CNS. Many findings support the assumption that the immune system plays a key role in the pathogenesis of MS, at least during the relapsing-remitting phase of disease.(1,2) Both arms of the adapted immune response seem to be crucial for the induction and maintenance of the autoimmune response as suggested by the success of therapies targeting T cells, B cells, or both. While genes and pathways involved in the pathogenesis of MS have emerged from recent studies, the molecular targets of the autoimmune response in MS are still largely uncertain. The identification of these targets, to better understand the pathogenesis and develop specific immune therapies, has been the focus of MS research during the last decades.
    Neurology 08/2013; 81(11). DOI:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a43e93 · 8.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is considered a heterogeneous disease with respect to disease progression and treatment response, which have both remained highly unpredictable. With an increasing number of available disease modifying therapies, strategies for treatment allocation in the individual patient or subgroup of patients has become more important. Therefore biomarkers, which will identify subgroups of MS patients and predict treatment response early in the course of the disease, are urgently needed. Here we review current and emerging biomarkers, as well as study concepts for identification of new biomarkers in MS.
    Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics 01/2014; 14(2). DOI:10.1586/14737175.2014.874289 · 2.78 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The search for autoantibodies in multiple sclerosis (MS) has been challenging for the last 3 decades. With the development of new proteomic methods and advances in expression and assay technologies, progress in the identification of MS autoantibodies has been made. A number of MS-specific autoantibodies have been proposed, most of them targeting proteins expressed in oligodendrocytes and along the myelin sheath. In this review, we summarize the status of antibody research in MS and then discuss recent developments and future strategies in defining and characterizing the potential antigenic targets of autoantibodies in MS.
    Multiple Sclerosis 03/2014; 20(3):271-9. DOI:10.1177/1352458514522104 · 4.82 Impact Factor
Show more