An Ecological Systems Perspective on the Clinical High Risk State Preceding Schizophrenia Onset

Social Work in Mental Health 11/2012; DOI: 10.1080/15332985.2012.708018

ABSTRACT Developments in psychosis-risk assessment over recent decades have made it possible to identify a “clinical high risk” population that has a substantially elevated likelihood of developing a psychotic disorder relative to the general population. The expanding body of research on the clinical high risk population has identified risk and protective factors from a variety of environmental sources ranging from the immediate, such as social function and daily hassles, to the more distal, such as mental health policy and societal stigma. An ecological model of the psychosis-risk state would facilitate an understanding of the complex and interactive processes that contribute to the attenuated psychotic symptoms and decline in function that characterize someone as being at clinical high risk. The present paper reviews clinical high risk research on social factors operating at various levels within the ecological systems framework, as defined by Bronfenbrenner (1977). An ecological model allows integration across levels of social influences that may directly or indirectly serve as risk or protective factors for the individual, thereby contributing to the onset or prevention of a full psychotic disorder.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Low self-esteem and high neuroticism are common features in psychosis, but in the absence of longitudinal studies it is unclear whether they represent consequences of the illness or risk factors acting before illness onset. A population sample of 3,929 individuals with no lifetime evidence of psychosis were interviewed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview and were administered the Groningen Neuroticism Scale and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale at baseline and 1 and 3 years later. At year 3, individuals with CIDI evidence of psychotic symptoms were interviewed by clinicians to identify incident psychotic or psychosis-like symptoms. Baseline neuroticism and self-esteem predicted first-ever onset of psychotic symptoms at year 3 (neuroticism, OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.09, 1.23; self-esteem, OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01, 1.18).When adjusted for each other and for level of anxiety and depression, neuroticism was the strongest independent predictor for onset of psychotic symptoms (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07, 1.26). Neuroticism increases the risk for development of psychotic symptoms. Mechanisms of risk may involve certain cognitive styles associated with neuroticism, such as beliefs about the uncontrollability of certain events and experiences. The association between low self-esteem and psychosis may involve the area of overlap between self-esteem and neuroticism.
    Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 02/2002; 37(1):1-6. · 2.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Considerable research has documented the stigmatization of people with mental illnesses and its negative consequences. Recently it has been shown that stigma may also seriously affect families of psychiatric patients, but little empirical research has addressed this problem. We examine perceptions of and reactions to stigma among 156 parents and spouses of a population-based sample of first-admission psychiatric patients. While most family members did not perceive themselves as being avoided by others because of their relative's hospitalization, half reported concealing the hospitalization at least to some degree. Both the characteristics of the mental illness (the stigmatizing mark) and the social characteristics of the family were significantly related to levels of family stigma. Family members were more likely to conceal the mental illness if they did not live with their ill relative, if the relative was female, and if the relative had less severe positive symptoms. Family members with more education and whose relative had experienced an episode of illness within the past 6 months reported greater avoidance by others.
    Schizophrenia Bulletin 01/1998; 24(1):115-26. · 8.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Expressed emotion (EE) is a measure of the family environment that has been demonstrated to be a reliable psychosocial predictor of relapse in schizophrenia. However, in recent years some prominent nonreplications of the EE-relapse relationship have been published. To more fully address the question of the predictive validity of EE, we conducted a meta-analysis of all available EE and outcome studies in schizophrenia. We also examined the predictive validity of the EE construct for mood disorders and eating disorders. An extensive literature search revealed 27 studies of the EE-outcome relationship in schizophrenia. Using meta-analytic procedures, we combined the findings of these investigations to provide an estimate of the effect size associated with the EE-relapse relationship. We also used meta-analysis to provide estimates of the effect sizes associated with EE for mood and eating disorders. The results confirmed that EE is a significant and robust predictor of relapse in schizophrenia. Additional analyses demonstrated that the EE-relapse relationship was strongest for patients with more chronic schizophrenic illness. Interestingly, although the EE construct is most closely associated with research in schizophrenia, the mean effect sizes for EE for both mood disorders and eating disorders were significantly higher than the mean effect size for schizophrenia. These findings highlight the importance of EE in the understanding and prevention of relapse in a broad range of psychopathological conditions.
    Archives of General Psychiatry 07/1998; 55(6):547-52. · 13.75 Impact Factor