The categorisation of drivers in relation to boredom

Transportation Planning and Technology (Impact Factor: 0.51). 02/2011; 34(1):51-69. DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2011.530829


This paper develops the concept of driver boredom by utilising a cluster analysis to describe different types of driver. A two-step cluster analysis of a 49-item questionnaire measuring driver boredom attitudes and perceptions was performed on 1563 UK drivers, yielding four groups, labelled as ‘young, inattentive and dangerous’, ‘enthusiastic and attentive’, ‘slow and unwilling’ and ‘safe and experienced’. These clusters are compared to ascertain personality and affect differences and whether or not there are different crash and penalty histories. The significant differences found enable the clusters to be seen in wider terms than simply boredom; they are considered in terms of theories of flow and arousal and also in light of previous attempts to classify driver types. This paper reports analyses that are part of a larger study of driver boredom.

28 Reads
  • Source
    • "I argue that the centrality of the rather mundane and commonplace utterances and practices that related to being bored and having fun, especially in relation to place, is critical. The research I refer to here that relates to boredom is (1) research that directly addresses boredom, that is either psychological (usually quantitative: Caldwell et al. 1999; Harvey, Heslop, and Thorpe 2011; Mercer-Lynn et al. 2011) or philosophical (which have been undertaken within literary studies, theoretical sociology or philosophy: Dalle Pezze and Salzani 2009), or (2) research that covertly relates to boredom in some sense, which includes a wider range of studies from the whole spectrum of disciplines/research areas. Within this latter category, boredom is often taken for granted, not considered analytically and/or is seen as an unwanted and negative outcome of spatial, social or cultural conditions. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this article I discuss how the experience of boredom becomes a vital part of the narratives and practices of a group of young greasers in a peri-urban community in Sweden. The ethnographic material originates from fieldwork carried out among the local ‘Volvo greasers’, aged between 15 and 19 years, at the local youth centre and the car park in a peri-urban community in Sweden in 2010. The aim of the article is to understand how place, personhood and social relations are intertwined in the greaser culture by introducing the concept of spatial boredom, which strives to illuminate the greasers' active engagement and negotiation with the experience of boredom. In light of this, the semantics of spatial boredom - the community's geographical placement as boring, reactive rather than active, static rather than dynamic - a symbolic link to femininity, domesticity, safety, routine and hence immanence is established. The orientation towards a ‘dangerous’, masculine-coded public space is reinforcing a split between both the feminine and the masculine and the public and the private.
    Gender Place and Culture A Journal of Feminist Geography 05/2014; 22(9):1-17. DOI:10.1080/0966369X.2014.958064 · 0.81 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Driver boredom has received little research attention in efforts to develop understanding of driver behaviour and further road safety. This study aimed to develop understanding of relationships between individual differences and driver boredom as well as between driver boredom and driver behaviour. A self-report questionnaire was developed and used to gather data pertaining to individual differences, driver boredom, and driver behaviour. The sample comprised 1550 male and female drivers aged between 17 and 65+ years. The results of this study show that people who are younger, less conscientious, and less enthusiastic about driving are more likely to pose a high threat to road safety because they are more likely to suffer driver boredom. Those more enthusiastic about driving seem less likely to suffer driver boredom due to their being more engaged in the driving task. Further research should be conducted to test whether engagement in the driving task and levels of perceived stimulation therein explain relations between driver enthusiasm and driver boredom. If this is the case, intervention programmes could be developed and tested in order to encourage engagement in the driving task and so limit driver boredom.
    Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 01/2014; 22:159–169. DOI:10.1016/j.trf.2013.12.004 · 1.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A variety of causes of boredom have been proposed including environmental, motivational, emotional, and cognitive factors. Here, we explore four potential cognitive causes of boredom: inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity, and executive dysfunction. Specifically, we examine the unique and common associations between these factors and boredom propensity. Recent research has established that the two most commonly used measures of boredom propensity (BPS and BSS) are not measuring the same underlying construct. Thus, a second goal of the present project is to determine the unique and common roles of inattention, hyperactivity, impulsivity and poor executive system functioning in predicting the BPS and BSS specifically. The findings reveal that inattention, hyperactivity and executive dysfunction predict boredom propensity, with shared variance accounting for the greater part of this effect. Further, executive dysfunction and hyperactivity uniquely predict boredom propensity as measured by the BPS and BSS, respectively.
    Consciousness and Cognition 04/2014; 27C(1):27-41. DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2013.10.001 · 2.31 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications