Coding of Vocalizations by Single Neurons in Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex.
Dept. Neurobiology & Anatomy, Univ. of Rochester, Box 603, Rochester, NY 14642.Hearing research (Impact Factor: 2.97). 07/2013; 305(1). DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2013.07.011
Neuronal activity in single prefrontal neurons has been correlated with behavioral responses, rules, task variables and stimulus features. In the non-human primate, neurons recorded in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) have been found to respond to species-specific vocalizations. Previous studies have found multisensory neurons which respond to simultaneously presented faces and vocalizations in this region. Behavioral data suggests that face and vocal information are inextricably linked in animals and humans and therefore may also be tightly linked in the coding of communication calls in prefrontal neurons. In this study we therefore examined the role of VLPFC in encoding vocalization call type information. Specifically, we examined previously recorded single unit responses from the VLPFC in awake, behaving rhesus macaques in response to 3 types of species-specific vocalizations made by 3 individual callers. Analysis of responses by vocalization call type and caller identity showed that ∼ 19 % of cells had a main effect of call type with fewer cells encoding caller. Classification performance of VLPFC neurons was ∼ 42% averaged across the population. When assessed at discrete time bins, classification performance reached 70 percent for coos in the first 300 ms and remained above chance for the duration of the response period, though performance was lower for other call types. In light of the sub-optimal classification performance of the majority of VLPFC neurons when only vocal information is present, and the recent evidence that most VLPFC neurons are multisensory, the potential enhancement of classification with the addition of accompanying face information is discussed and additional studies recommended. Behavioral and neuronal evidence has shown a considerable benefit in recognition and memory performance when faces and voices are presented simultaneously. In the natural environment both facial and vocalization information is present simultaneously and neural systems no doubt evolved to integrate multisensory stimuli during recognition.
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "Single-unit recordings in macaques are predictive of the results in the present study because neurons across several regions of the lateral PFC are driven by a variety of visual stimuli, whereas in VLPFC there is a specific auditory responsive region (Romanski and Goldman-Rakic, 2002; Romanski et al., 2005; Russ et al., 2008b). These neurons are robustly responsive to complex sounds, including species-specific vocalizations (Romanski et al., 2005; Cohen et al., 2006; Plakke et al., 2013a) and are active during AV WM (Hwang and Romanski, 2015). Cooling these neurons, in the present study, disrupted auditory WM. "
ABSTRACT: Unlabelled: The prefrontal cortex is associated with cognitive functions that include planning, reasoning, decision-making, working memory, and communication. Neurophysiology and neuropsychology studies have established that dorsolateral prefrontal cortex is essential in spatial working memory while the ventral frontal lobe processes language and communication signals. Single-unit recordings in nonhuman primates has shown that ventral prefrontal (VLPFC) neurons integrate face and vocal information and are active during audiovisual working memory. However, whether VLPFC is essential in remembering face and voice information is unknown. We therefore trained nonhuman primates in an audiovisual working memory paradigm using naturalistic face-vocalization movies as memoranda. We inactivated VLPFC, with reversible cortical cooling, and examined performance when faces, vocalizations or both faces and vocalization had to be remembered. We found that VLPFC inactivation impaired subjects' performance in audiovisual and auditory-alone versions of the task. In contrast, VLPFC inactivation did not disrupt visual working memory. Our studies demonstrate the importance of VLPFC in auditory and audiovisual working memory for social stimuli but suggest a different role for VLPFC in unimodal visual processing. Significance statement: The ventral frontal lobe, or inferior frontal gyrus, plays an important role in audiovisual communication in the human brain. Studies with nonhuman primates have found that neurons within ventral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) encode both faces and vocalizations and that VLPFC is active when animals need to remember these social stimuli. In the present study, we temporarily inactivated VLPFC by cooling the cortex while nonhuman primates performed a working memory task. This impaired the ability of subjects to remember a face and vocalization pair or just the vocalization alone. Our work highlights the importance of the primate VLPFC in the processing of faces and vocalizations in a manner that is similar to the inferior frontal gyrus in the human brain.The Journal of Neuroscience : The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 07/2015; 35(26):9666-75. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1218-15.2015 · 6.34 Impact Factor
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "This latter representation is likely to be situated in the auditory ventral stream, where representations of " auditory objects " have been found (Tian et al., 2001; Zatorre et al., 2004). In a hierarchical model, information about spectral structure and temporal modulation, including pitch, are stored in early ventral areas and in core (Leaver and Rauschecker, 2010; Schindler et al., 2013); higher-order object information, e.g., about timbre, which would reveal the identity of an instrument or singer, is most likely found in the anterior-most regions of superior temporal cortex (Leaver and Rauschecker, 2010) and in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (Cohen et al., 2009; Plakke et al., 2013). Even in the most hierarchical model, however, it seems unlikely to find single neurons responding selectively to lengthy melodies, just as it seems unreasonable to expect single neurons to respond to specific sentences in the language domain. "
ABSTRACT: Music consists of strings of sound that vary over time. Technical devices, such as tape recorders, store musical melodies by transcribing event times of temporal sequences into consecutive locations on the storage medium. Playback occurs by reading out the stored information in the same sequence. However, it is unclear how the brain stores and retrieves auditory sequences. Neurons in the anterior lateral belt of auditory cortex are sensitive to the combination of sound features in time, but the integration time of these neurons is not sufficient to store longer sequences that stretch over several seconds, minutes or more. Functional imaging studies in humans provide evidence that music is stored instead within the auditory dorsal stream, including premotor and prefrontal areas. In monkeys, these areas are the substrate for learning of motor sequences. It appears, therefore, that the auditory dorsal stream transforms musical into motor sequence information and vice versa, realizing what are known as forward and inverse models. The basal ganglia and the cerebellum are involved in setting up the sensorimotor associations, translating timing information into spatial codes and back again.Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience 08/2014; 8:149. DOI:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00149
[Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
- "As described above, VLPFC contains neurons that are responsive to complex sounds including, species-specific vocalizations and human vocalizations (Romanski and Goldman-Rakic, 2002; Romanski et al., 2005), suggesting a role for VLPFC in auditory object processing. VLPFC involvement in auditory feature processing is supported by studies showing single-units that encode categories of vocalization call types (Averbeck and Romanski, 2004, 2006; Plakke et al., 2013b). Moreover, evidence that VLPFC cells are multisensory and respond to the simultaneous presentation of faces and their corresponding vocalizations strongly suggests a role in recognition and identity processing, a ventral stream function (Sugihara et al., 2006). "
ABSTRACT: The functional auditory system extends from the ears to the frontal lobes with successively more complex functions occurring as one ascends the hierarchy of the nervous system. Several areas of the frontal lobe receive afferents from both early and late auditory processing regions within the temporal lobe. Afferents from the early part of the cortical auditory system, the auditory belt cortex, which are presumed to carry information regarding auditory features of sounds, project to only a few prefrontal regions and are most dense in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC). In contrast, projections from the parabelt and the rostral superior temporal gyrus (STG) most likely convey more complex information and target a larger, widespread region of the prefrontal cortex. Neuronal responses reflect these anatomical projections as some prefrontal neurons exhibit responses to features in acoustic stimuli, while other neurons display task-related responses. For example, recording studies in non-human primates indicate that VLPFC is responsive to complex sounds including vocalizations and that VLPFC neurons in area 12/47 respond to sounds with similar acoustic morphology. In contrast, neuronal responses during auditory working memory involve a wider region of the prefrontal cortex. In humans, the frontal lobe is involved in auditory detection, discrimination, and working memory. Past research suggests that dorsal and ventral subregions of the prefrontal cortex process different types of information with dorsal cortex processing spatial/visual information and ventral cortex processing non-spatial/auditory information. While this is apparent in the non-human primate and in some neuroimaging studies, most research in humans indicates that specific task conditions, stimuli or previous experience may bias the recruitment of specific prefrontal regions, suggesting a more flexible role for the frontal lobe during auditory cognition.Frontiers in Neuroscience 07/2014; 8(8):199. DOI:10.3389/fnins.2014.00199 · 3.66 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.