Measuring wounds to improve outcomes

Lia van Rijswijk is an instructor at Holy Family University School of Nursing and Allied Health Professions in Philadelphia, the clinical editor of Ostomy Wound Management, and the coordinator of Wound Wise: . The author has disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.
The American journal of nursing (Impact Factor: 1.3). 08/2013; 113(8):60-1. DOI: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000432967.20419.1b
Source: PubMed


Wound measurement is the only evidence-based predictor of healing.

Download full-text


Available from: Lia van Rijswijk, Oct 03, 2015
40 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the patient and healing characteristics related to full-thickness pressure ulcers, 119 consecutive patients admitted with ulcers in three acute care, four longterm care, and one rehabilitation agency were studied. Of the 119 patients with 153 pressure ulcers, only 48 (40%) had full-thickness ulcers. Compared to patients with partial-thickness ulcers, patients with full-thickness ulcers were more likely to have multiple ulcers, occasional incontinence of urine and feces, a compromised overall skin condition, and a less than optimal nutritional status at baseline. Full-thickness ulcers treated with a hydrocolloid dressing (DuoDERM Hydroactive) did not develop adverse reactions; clinicians perceived the dressing to be efficacious. Ulcers that healed during the study decreased 47% in area in two weeks. This distinguished ulcers that healed from those that did not heal. The findings suggest that ulcers that do not decrease in size within two weeks should be reevaluated for additional or alternate treatments.
    Decubitus 02/1993; 6(1):16-21.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Venous leg ulcers, which may take months to heal, account for 40-70% of all lower extremity chronic wounds. New treatment options for venous leg ulcers have recently been proposed, and therefore deciding which patients are candidates for these novel-and often expensive-treatments is an important task. Moreover, researchers conducting clinical trials often wish to enroll patients who are unlikely to heal in order to minimize sample sizes needed and research costs. Our purpose was to assess the use of percentage change in venous leg ulcer area over the first few weeks of treatment as a prognostic indicator of healing or non-healing at 24 weeks. We conducted a cohort study based on an existing data set from a multicentre randomized clinical trial that enrolled 104 patients. Wounds were measured using digital planimetry for 4 consecutive weeks following the inception of good wound care. Utilizing the Wilcoxon rank sum (Mann-Whitney) test, we found that percentage change in area over time distinguished between those who healed and those who failed to heal after 24 weeks of good wound care (P < 0.05). The rate of healing, or area healed per week, did not differentiate between those who healed at 24 weeks and those who did not, as all patients had similar rates of healing over the first 4 weeks of treatment. Percentage change in area from baseline to week 4 provided the best combination of positive and negative predictive values (68.2%, 74.7%) and the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (0.75). Thus, percentage change in area over the first 4 weeks of treatment represents a practical and predictive measure of complete wound healing by 24 weeks.
    British Journal of Dermatology 05/2000; 142(5):960-4. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03478.x · 4.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To evaluate the probability of wound healing based on percentage of wound area reduction (PWAR) at 1 and 4 weeks in individuals with large, chronic, nonischemic diabetic foot wounds following partial foot amputation. Data from a 16-week randomized clinical trial (RCT) of 162 patients were analyzed to compare outcomes associated with negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) delivered through the V.A.C. Therapy System (Kinetic Concepts, San Antonio, TX) (n = 77) versus standard moist wound therapy (MWT) (n = 85). The 1- and 4-week regression models included 153 and 129 of the RCT patients, respectively. Early changes in PWAR were predictive of final healing at 16 weeks. Specifically, wounds that reached >or=15% PWAR at 1 week or >or=60% PWAR at 4 weeks had a 68 and 77% (respectively) probability of healing vs. a 31 and 30% probability if these wound area reductions were not achieved. Patients receiving NPWT were 2.5 times more likely to achieve both a 15% PWAR at 1 week and a 60% area reduction at 1 month (odds ratios 2.51 and 2.49, respectively) compared with those receiving MWT. Results of this study suggest that clinicians can calculate the PWAR of a wound as early as 1 week into treatment to predict the likelihood of healing at 16 weeks. This might also assist in identifying a rationale to reevaluate the wound and change wound therapies.
    Diabetes care 01/2008; 31(1):26-9. DOI:10.2337/dc07-1300 · 8.42 Impact Factor