2011 Wall effect on pressure drop in packed beds

Powder Technology (Impact Factor: 2.35). 07/2011; 210(3):261-266. DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2011.03.026


The wall effect on the pressure drop in packed beds could be considered by modifying the Ergun equation based on the concept of hydraulic radius. However, the prediction of the two constants involved in the modified Ergun equation, if using the correlations available in the literature, could differ significantly from one another, and all correlations are not applicable for very low bed-to-particle diameter ratios. In this study, a capillary-type model is proposed to be composed of a bundle of capillary tubes subject to a series of local energy losses, the latter being simulated in terms of sphere drag. The formulas derived provide a good description of variations in the two constants for bed-to-particle diameter ratios ranging from 1.1 to 50.5.

Download full-text


Available from: Nian-Sheng Cheng, Sep 09, 2014
  • Source
    • "The wall effect on the pressure drop in packed beds was considered in the modified equations, which are mainly based on the concept of hydraulic radius. Cheng [9] has discussed such various modified equations. Some of these correlations are listed below. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Lithium titanate (Li2TiO3) and lithium orthosilicate (Li4SiO4) are the promising solid breeder materials for the fusion reactors. Packed bed of Li2TiO3 or Li4SiO4 pebbles are considered in the fusion reactor blanket for in-situ production of tritium and for this a good effective thermal conductivity of the pebble bed is necessary. In recent past, Mandal et al. [26] studied the hydrodynamics and heat transfer properties of bed of lithium titanate pebbles at different operating conditions viz., gas flow rates, pebble sizes, bed wall temperatures etc. In the present study laminar, and low Reynolds model have been used to simulate the hydrodynamics and heat transfer data of Li2TiO3 pebble bed. The CFD simulated hydrodynamics results have been compared with hydrodynamics and heat transfer results of bed of Li2TiO3 pebbles reported by Mandal et al. [26] and others. It was found that and low Reynolds number model shows better agreement with experimental results. The CFD study were carried out using low Reynolds model for pebble bed of different materials viz. Li2TiO3, Li4SiO4 and alumina (Al2O3). The effect of flow rate, pebble size, wall temperature, solid properties viz. thermal conductivity and specific heat on effective thermal conductivity and overall heat transfer coefficient has been discussed in this paper.
    Indian Chemical Engineer 03/2015; Published online: 11 Mar 2015(0019-4506):1–23. DOI:10.1080/00194506.2015.1022234
    • "The Ergunequation was chosen as the reference equation of this study for both the DEM–CFD simulations and correlations and is compared to newer methods for predicting the pressure drop. The Ergun-equation neglects wall effects and is therefore applicable for column diameter D to particle diameters d p of ≫10 [17]. As especially in small reactors the wall friction plays an important role in the total pressure drop of a system, some efforts have been made to incorporate these effects into the Ergun-equation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unstructured packings consisting of arbitrary shaped particles are widely used in chemical, biochemical and petrochemical industries as well as in energy technology. In packings passed through by a fluid, pressure drops are of key concern and can be derived experimentally, calculated by empirical correlations or by numerical approaches. Among numerical approaches either resolved flow simulations or porous approaches are feasible. In the latter approach large systems can be addressed at reasonable computational expense. The fluid velocity is addressed as a spatially averaged quantity per fluid cell which is larger than a single particle. Information on the porosity must be provided by either experimental techniques or particle based methods such as the discrete element method (DEM). The DEM can be coupled with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to a combined DEM–CFD approach and is then applicable to systems involving arbitrary shaped particles. As flow is not resolved in porous approaches information on the pressure drop must be provided by suitable submodels e.g. the combination of the drag force model by Di Felice (Int. J. Multiph. Flow. 20 (1994) 153–159 [1]) and the drag coefficient model by Hölzer and Sommerfeld (Powder Technol. 184 (2008) 361–365 [2]). As there is an ongoing discussion regarding the validity of these combined submodels, pressure drops in packings of spherical and non-spherical particles are derived by carefully performed experimental investigations as a verification. Numerically obtained results from the DEM–CFD are benchmarked against the experiments and available empirical correlations for the pressure drop. Results are in very good agreement for spheres. For complex shaped particles DEM–CFD simulations can be very flexibly applied. Simulations are generally in good agreement with experiments depending on the particle shape and size and are often better than empirical correlations which are usually tailored towards certain shapes and therefore limited in their usability.
    Powder Technology 02/2015; 271:109-124. DOI:10.1016/j.powtec.2014.11.001 · 2.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: By means of numerical modeling, the behavior of chemical reactors for multiphase reactions can be predicted and the experimental effort can be reduced to a minimum. A Pellet String Reactor for a heterogeneously catalyzed reaction has been investigated based on a model built with the CFD software COMSOL Multiphysics ® 4.2a [1]. Pressure drop and residence time distribution studies were performed to evaluate the reactor design regarding its hydrodynamic characteristics. The influence of the fluid velocity is discussed as well as the model dimension. For an estimation of the hydrodynamic characteristics a 2D model was regarded as sufficient.
    Procedia Engineering 12/2012; 42:1189-1201. DOI:10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.511
Show more