Further support for a Cretaceous age for the feathered-dinosaur beds of Liaoning,China:New 40 Ar÷ 39 Ar dating of the Yixian and Tuchengzi Formations

Chinese Science Bulletin (Impact Factor: 1.37). 01/2002; 47(2):136-139. DOI: 10.1360/02tb9031

ABSTRACT We report new 40Ar÷39Ar dating results obtained from total fusion and incremental-heating analyses of sanidine and biotite from three tuffs found
interbedded within the fossil-bearing deposits of Liaoning, northeast China. The first is a new sample of the Bed 6 Sihetun
tuff from the Yixian Formation, previously dated by our team as middle Early Cretaceous, and recently considered by Lo et
al., partially reset due to metamorphism from a nearby basaltic sill. The second is the Yixian Bed 9 tuff from Hengdaozi considered
by Lo et al. to be unaffected by metamorphism and whose age, based on total fusion 40Ar÷39Ar dating of biotite, argues for a Jurassic age for the Yixian Formation. The third tuff is a previously undated tuff from
the upper part of the underlying Tuchengzi Formation. Single crystal total fusion 40Ar÷39Ar analyses of the Sihetun sanidine showed homogeneous radiogenic Ar, Ca÷K ratios, excellent reproducibility and gave a mean
age of 125.0±0.18 (1SD)±0.04 (SE) Ma. Single sanidine crystal total fusion 40Ar÷39Ar analyses of the Hengdaozi tuff gave a mean age of 125.0±0.19 (1SD)±0.04 (SE) Ma, which is indistinguishable from the Sihetun
tuff. The Tuchengzi Formation tuff gave a mean age of 139.4±0.19 (1SD)±0.05 (SE) Ma. Detailed laser incremental-heating analyses
of biotite from Sihetun, Hengdaozi, and Tuchengzi tuffs show disturbed Ar release patterns and evidence of trapped argon components.
We conclude from these analyses that the total fusion dates on biotite by Lo et al. are erroneously old and isotopic dating
of both biotite and sanidine from tuffs of the Yixian Formation point to a middle Early Cretaceous age. The upper part of
the Tuchengzi Formation can be referred to the Early Cretaceous.

  • Source
    Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 01/2006; 4(4):359-395. · 2.85 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Tuchengzi Formation is widespread in North China. Its clastic deposits indicate a tropical, dry, and hot paleoclimate, different from the subtropical, humid, and seasonal climate in the early Middle Jurassic. The sudden environmental change from the Middle to Late Jurassic resulted in a rapid disappearance of the Yanliao/Daohugou Biota, with more than 90% of the species of the Yanliao/Daohugou Biota dying out and replaced by the Early Cretaceous Jehol Biota. Eolian sandstones with large-scale cross-bedding occur within the uppermost part of the Tuchengzi Formation in North China. The sandstones are stratigraphically higher than the tuff previously dated as 139 Ma. We obtained two SHRIMP zircon U/Pb ages from the tuff beds. One sample was collected from the tuff in the basal Tuchengzi Formation in northern Hebei and the other from the tuff intercalated in the eolian cross-bedded sandstones in the uppermost Tuchengzi Formation in western Liaoning. Our results show that 154 Ma is the oldest age constraint for the Tuchengzi Formation and 137 Ma is the youngest age estimate of the formation, providing an age constraint for the transition from the Yanliao Biota to the Jehol Biota.
    Palaeoworld 12/2012; 21(3-4):222-234. DOI:10.1016/j.palwor.2012.10.003
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Dating the tree of life is a core endeavor in evolutionary biology. Rates of evolution are fundamental to nearly every evolutionary model and process. Rates need dates. There is much debate on the most appropriate and reasonable ways in which to date the tree of life, and recent work has highlighted some confusions and complexities that can be avoided. Whether phylogenetic trees are dated after they have been established , or as part of the process of tree finding, practitioners need to know which calibrations to use. We emphasize the importance of identifying crown (not stem) fossils, levels of confidence in their attribution to the crown, current chronostratigraphic precision , the primacy of the host geological formation and asymmetric confidence intervals. Here we present calibrations for 88 key nodes across the phylogeny of animals, ranging from the root of Metazoa to the last common ancestor of Homo sapiens. Close attention to detail is constantly required: for example, the classic bird-mammal date (base of crown Amniota) has often been given as 310-315 Ma; the 2014 international time scale indicates a minimum age of 318 Ma.
    Palaeontologia Electronica 02/2015; 18:1-116. · 1.37 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 4, 2014