Article

Brain wave maturation and neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely low gestational age neonates

Department of Pediatrics, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Journal of perinatology: official journal of the California Perinatal Association (Impact Factor: 2.35). 07/2013; 33(11). DOI: 10.1038/jp.2013.79
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Objective:Infants born at extremely low gestational ages are at high risk for developmental impairments. Early predictors of these impairments are useful for both clinicians and researchers. Our objective was to assess the correlation between the rate of brain wave maturation as measured by serial amplitude-integrated electroencephalograms (aEEGs) and scores on standardized measures of infant development in extremely low gestational age neonates.Study Design:This was a prospective observational study of 65 infants born before 28 weeks' gestational age who were assessed with an aEEG monthly between 28 and 36 weeks' postmenstrual age and with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III at 18 to 22 months adjusted age. We analyzed the correlation between the rate of brain wave maturation on aEEG and Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-III Cognitive and Motor Scales.Result:The mean rate of brain wave maturation was 0.83 (±0.36) points per week. Brain wave maturation was not correlated with either the Cognitive or Motor Scale (adjusted regression coefficients for Cognitive and Motor Scales were 1.61 (s.e.: 4.20; P=0.70) and 2.39 (s.e.: 4.62; P=0.61), respectively.Conclusion:Among extremely preterm infants, the rate of maturational changes in brain wave characteristics between 28 and 36 weeks' postmenstrual age is not predictive of developmental abilities at 18 to 22 months adjusted age.Journal of Perinatology advance online publication, 18 July 2013; doi:10.1038/jp.2013.79.

1 Follower
 · 
56 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The electrocortical background contains prognostic information in full-term asphyxiated newborn infants already during the first postnatal hours. In preterm infants with intra-ventricular hemorrhages (IVH) the background activity in EEG and amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) is depressed during the first days of life, and the extent of the depression correlates with the degree of IVH. However, it has not been previously evaluated whether very early aEEG can predict later outcome also in pre-term infants. To investigate if early prediction of outcome is possible from aEEG in preterm infants with large IVH. aEEG recordings from the first postnatal week were investigated in 64 preterm infants with IVH grade III - IV. For every 24-hour period the aEEG background pattern was classified, and the maximum and minimum numbers of bursts/h, respectively,were counted. Outcome was divided into three categories: died (n = 36), survived (n = 28) with "poor" outcome, i.e., severe cerebral palsy and not able to walk and/or mental retardation (n = 8), and survived with "fair" outcome, i.e., healthy or mild cerebral palsy (n = 19). One surviving child was lost in the follow-up. There were significant differences in maximum bursts/h (MaxB) at 0-24 hours (p = 0.033), 24-48 hours (p = 0.011), 48-72 hours (p=0.049) and 72-96 hours (p=0.032), respectively, between the infants who died and the surviving infants. At 24-48 hours the median (range) MaxB in the surviving infants with "fair" outcome was 156 (103-179) versus 102 (73-156) in the surviving infants with "poor" outcome (p = 0.002). With the assumption that MaxB < 130 was predictive of death or survival with "poor" outcome, 68 % and 78% of infants were correctly predicted at 0-24 hours and 24-48 hours, respectively. This study shows that outcome may be predicted with aEEG already during the first days of life in preterm infants with large IVH. The findings should be confirmed in prospective studies since they may have clinical implications if specific medical interventions become available.
    Neuropediatrics 01/2002; 32(6):319-24. DOI:10.1055/s-2001-20408 · 1.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To prospectively investigate the development of amplitude-integrated electroencephalographic (aEEG) activity during the first 2 weeks of life in neurologically normal and clinically stable preterm infants <30 weeks' gestational age (GA). Infants with a GA of <30 weeks admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit of the Vienna University Children's Hospital (Vienna, Austria) were studied prospectively by using aEEG and cranial ultrasound. Clinically stable infants without clinical or sonographic evidence of neurologic abnormalities were eligible for inclusion in the reference group. The distribution of 3 background aEEG activity patterns (discontinuous low-voltage, discontinuous high-voltage, and continuous), presence of sleep-wake cycles, and number of bursts per hour in the reference group were determined by visual analysis. Seventy-five infants (median GA: 27 weeks; range: 23-29 weeks) were eligible for inclusion in the reference group and had aEEG recordings during the first 2 weeks of life available. Analysis of aEEG background activity showed that with higher GA the relative amount of continuous activity increased while discontinuous patterns decreased. The number of bursts per hour decreased with increasing GA. Cyclical changes in aEEG background activity resembling early sleep-wake cycles were observed in all infants. Normal values for aEEG background activity were determined in preterm infants <30 weeks' GA. Clinically stable and neurologically normal preterm infants exhibit at least 2 different patterns of aEEG activity. There is a correlation between the GA and the relative duration of continuous aEEG activity.
    PEDIATRICS 01/2004; 113(1 Pt 1):e61-6. DOI:10.1542/peds.113.1.e61 · 5.30 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Babson and Benda 1976 "fetal-infant growth graph" for preterm infants is commonly used in neonatal intensive care. Its limits include the small sample size which provides low confidence in the extremes of the data, the 26 weeks start and the 500 gram graph increments. The purpose of this study was to develop an updated growth chart beginning at 22 weeks based on a meta-analysis of published reference studies. The literature was searched from 1980 to 2002 for more recent data to complete the pre and post term sections of the chart. Data were selected from population studies with large sample sizes. Comparisons were made between the new chart and the Babson and Benda graph. To validate the growth chart the growth results from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (NICHD) were superimposed on the new chart. The new data produced curves that generally followed patterns similar to the old growth graph. Mean differences between the curves of the two charts reached statistical significance after term. Babson's 10th percentiles fell between the new data percentiles: the 5th to 17th for weight, the 5th and 15th for head circumference, and the 6th and 16th for length. The growth patterns of the NICHD infants deviated away from the curves of the chart in the first weeks after birth. When the infants reached an average weight of 2 kilograms, those with a birthweight in the range of 700 to 1000 grams had achieved greater than the 10th percentile on average for head growth, but remained below the 3rd percentile for weight and length. The updated growth chart allows a comparison of an infant's growth first with the fetus as early as 22 weeks and then with the term infant to 10 weeks. Comparison of the size of the NICHD infants at a weight of 2 kilograms provides evidence that on average preterm infants are growth retarded with respect to weight and length while their head size has caught up to birth percentiles. As with all meta-analyses, the validity of this growth chart is limited by the heterogeneity of the data sources. Further validation is needed to illustrate the growth patterns of preterm infants to older ages.
    BMC Pediatrics 01/2004; 3:13. DOI:10.1186/1471-2431-3-13 · 1.92 Impact Factor