Article

KIT, NRAS and BRAF mutations in sinonasal mucosal melanoma: a study of 56 cases.

Department of Oncology-Pathology, Cancer Center Karolinska, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
British Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 5.08). 07/2013; DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.373
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Background:Mucosal melanomas in the head and neck region are most frequently located in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) comprises <1% of all melanomas. The aim was to determine the KIT, NRAS and BRAF mutation frequencies in a large series of primary SNMMs.Methods:Laser capture microdissection was used to isolate tumour cells from 56 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumours. The tumour cells were screened for KIT, NRAS and BRAF mutations by direct sequencing.Results:Overall, 21% (12 out of 56) of SNMMs harboured KIT, NRAS or BRAF mutations. Mutations in these oncogenes occurred in a mutually exclusive manner. Both KIT and BRAF mutations were identified at a similar frequency of 4% each (2 out of 56), whereas NRAS mutations were detected in 14% (8 out of 56) of the SNMMs. Four of the NRAS mutations were located in exon 1. Mutations in these oncogenes were significantly more common in melanomas located in the paranasal sinuses than in nasal cavity (P=0.045). In a multivariate analysis, patients with melanomas in the nasal cavity had a significantly better overall survival than those with tumours in the paranasal sinuses (P=0.027).Conclusion:Our findings show that KIT and BRAF mutations, which are accessible for present targeted therapies, are only rarely present in SNMMs, whereas NRAS mutations seem to be relatively more frequent. The data show that majority of SNMMs harbour alterations in genes other than KIT, NRAS and BRAF.British Journal of Cancer advance online publication 16 July 2013; doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.373 www.bjcancer.com.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
23 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extracutaneous melanomas are poorly characterized tumors that include ocular (OM), mucosal (MM) and leptomeningeal melanomas, often lacking standardized staging and treatment guidelines. We analyzed cases of cutaneous melanoma (CM, N=219,890), OM (N=7,069) and MM (N=2,755) of different anatomical origins, diagnosed between 1988 and 2010, recorded in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Relative survival was studied in patients grouped by summary stage classification (localized, regional or distant disease) and in multivariate models adjusting for varying distribution of baseline factors. Unlike in CM, the incidence rate in MM increased exponentially with age. Five-year relative survival was significantly worse for OM (78%) and for most mucosal sites (aggregate 34%, range 3%-69%) compared with CM (89%). The differences between primary sites were particularly pronounced in localized disease, with a hazard ratio of 5.7 for OM, 4.3-9.0 for external genital or oral cavity MM and 19.8-90.4 for other mucosal locations. Melanomas of the pharynx, gastrointestinal, urinary tract and vagina had poor outcomes regardless of clinical stage. In contrast to CM, there was no evidence of improved survival in OM and MM during the study period. A substantial proportion of patients with operable OM or MM underwent radical organ resections (13-88% depending on site and stage) or perioperative radiotherapy (0-66%). In conclusion, extracutaneous melanomas have a markedly worse survival than CM and aggressive locoregional management appears to be insufficient for their control. Because of poor outcomes in MM, studies of systemic therapy are warranted regardless of the extent of disease at presentation. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    International Journal of Cancer 11/2013; · 6.20 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Mucosal melanomas are aggressive cancers of mucosal surfaces with clinical and pathologic characteristics distinct from cutaneous melanomas, warranting different staging systems and treatment approaches. Surgical resection is performed frequently for the primary tumor, although the utility of lymph node surgery and radiation therapy is not established. Therapies targeted against C-KIT activating mutations, identified in many mucosal melanomas, are emerging as promising treatments.
    Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 05/2014; · 4.91 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from