Article

Which Blair Project?: Communitarianism, Social Authoritarianism and Social Work

Journal of Social Work (Impact Factor: 1). 01/2001; 1(1):7-19. DOI:10.1177/146801730100100102

ABSTRACT This article provides an analysis of the current ideological and political context through which the nature and identity of social work are being constructed. The analysis briefly traces the development of social policy during the Conservative administrations in the UK between 1979 and 1997: and then a more detailed analysis is undertaken of the period since 1997 under the New Labour government of Tony Blair.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
26 Views
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article focuses upon the introduction of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) as a replacement for the main income replacement benefit, Incapacity Benefit (IB), for sick and/or disabled people in Britain. The article argues that the process of claiming ESA, a process that is dependent upon medicalised perceptions of capability to work and which is aimed at managing the perceived economic and social costs of sick and impaired people, is a means of sorting sick and/or disabled people into subgroups of claimants. The article goes on to discuss the implications of this observation with regard to explanations of the disadvantages that sick and/or disabled people face and their implications for the income of such people. The article concludes that because the shift from IB to ESA is premised upon a number of mistaken assumptions, it represents a retrograde development for people who are sick and/or who have impairments.
    Policy Studies 02/2010; 31(2):265-282. · 0.79 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Welfare-to-work lies at the heart of the British government's employment strategy. Its key initiative – a series of ‘New Deals’ for the unemployed – is a supply-side active labour market policy that has been combined with important changes to the tax and benefit system to try and engage the unemployed in employment. In this, the need to give support to individuals to partake in work is emphasised. Yet there is little consideration of how the re-regulation of labour markets through welfare-to-work is contingent upon gender and class relations which condition the levels of access that (working-class) women and men have to employment. This article explores gender issues across Britain's outgoing Labour government's New Deal initiative using a local case study to consider how the institutionalisation of welfare-to-work at the local level constrains, rather than enables, improvements to women's quality of life. In constraining the potential of local projects to offer working-class women access to the labour market through programmes that create a genuine ‘work–life’ balance (as opposed to seeking the advancement of a market rationale), institutional restructuring around the New Deals is found to increase the pressures on women to be ‘work-ready’. With greater numbers of women facing the challenges of unemployment in the current recession, the framework of contemporary policy does not effectively tackle the acute difficulties that ‘working-class’ women face in accessing paid work and consequently legitimates the gendered effects of (un)employment. In this context, attention to the gendering of governmental techniques associated with welfare-to-work is argued to be of ever increasing importance. La asistencia pública-al-trabajo está ubicada en el corazón de la estrategia de empleo del gobierno británico. Su iniciativa clave – una serie de ‘New Deals’ para los desempleados – es una política de oferta del mercado laboral que ha sido combinada con cambios importantes en el sistema tributario para intentar involucrar a los desempleados en el mercado laboral. En este tema, se enfatiza la necesidad de dar apoyo a los individuos para que tomen parte en el trabajo. Sin embargo hay poca consideración sobre cómo la regulación de los mercados laborales a través de la asistencia pública-al-trabajo depende de las relaciones de género y clase que condicionan los niveles de acceso que las mujeres y hombres (trabajadoras y trabajadores) tienen al trabajo. Este artículo examina los temas de género a lo ancho de la iniciativa del New Deal del gobierno laborista británico saliente, utilizando un estudio de caso local para considerar cómo la institucionalización a nivel local de la asistencia pública-al-trabajo limita, en vez de posibilitar, las mejoras en la calidad de vida de las mujeres. Al limitar el potencial de proyectos locales para brindar acceso para las mujeres de clase trabajadora al mercado laboral a través de programas que crean un equilibrio genuino ‘trabajo-vida personal’ (en vez de buscar el avance de una lógica de mercado), la reestructuración institucional alrededor de los New Deals incrementa las presiones sobre las mujeres a estar ‘preparadas para el trabajo’. Con cada vez más mujeres afrontando los desafíos del desempleo en la actual recesión, el marco de las políticas actuales no aborda en forma efectiva las graves dificultades que las mujeres de ‘clase trabajadora’ afrontan para acceder al trabajo pago y consecuentemente legitima los efectos generizados del (des)empleo. En este contexto, se argumenta que es cada vez más importante prestar atención a la generización de las técnicas gubernamentales asociadas con la asistencia pública-al-trabajo.
    Gender. 10/2011; Place and Culture(Vol. 18):611-633.
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article is a methodological exploration. It brings together three unlikely fields of knowledge: the practice field of community development, the organizational context of bureaucracy and the futures methodology known as Causal Layered Analysis (CLA). The paper begins by explaining CLA and then providing an overview of the field of community development within the organizational context of bureaucracy. It briefly describes the research process and then outlines findings at each layer of analysis. The paper concludes by reflecting upon the usefulness of CLA as a means of responding to dilemmas within the current practice of community development.
    Community Development 01/2011; 42(1):3-15.

I. Butler