Which Blair Project?: Communitarianism, Social Authoritarianism and Social Work

Journal of Social Work (Impact Factor: 1). 04/2001; 1(1):7-19. DOI: 10.1177/146801730100100102


This article provides an analysis of the current ideological and political context through which the nature and identity of social work are being constructed. The analysis briefly traces the development of social policy during the Conservative administrations in the UK between 1979 and 1997: and then a more detailed analysis is undertaken of the period since 1997 under the New Labour government of Tony Blair.

1 Follower
17 Reads
  • Source
    • "In this process, successive British governments, particularly Blair's administration, have been the keenest adherents of this general approach. The result has been the introduction a raft of measures (Butler & Drakeford, 2001) which were aimed at using social policy as a means imposing societal norms on the marginalised. This was a conscious political move. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Professor Loic Wacquant was born in Montpelier in 1960. He was educated in France before completing a Ph.D. in Chicago in 1994. He is currently Professor of Sociology at the University of California at Berkeley. His work is concerned with the impact of neoliberalism in the area of welfare and penal policy. Wacquant has published a number of highly influential books the most notable of which are Les Prisons de la misère (1999, translated in 20 languages; new and expanded English edition, Prisons of Poverty, 2009), Body and Soul: Ethnographic Notebooks of an Apprentice Boxer (2000), Urban Outcasts: A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality (2008) and Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity (2009). These works, along with the major papers listed in the bibliography, form the core of Wacquant's analysis of the impact of neoliberal welfare and penal policy. These papers consider three key areas: advanced marginality, race (ethno-racial domination) and the rise of the penal state. His significance as a commentator for social work, specifically, lies in his critical engagement with these three areas that have so shaped the development of modern welfare and penal policy. The article concludes that Wacquant's work provides a clear analytical framework for the study of the organisational and social contexts of contemporary practice. His work also calls for a more politically engaged social work practice—a form of practice that will move away from social work as a narrow bureaucratic activity dominated by risk management and return to core social work values.
    European Journal of Social Work 03/2015; DOI:10.1080/13691457.2015.1022861 · 0.58 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "This has seen 'New Labour' governments extend the project of restructuring the relationship between the state and its citizens initiated by New Right Conservatives (Jordan, 2005). Social services, once envisaged as the province of a universal citizenship are now mere supports for the irresponsible (Butler and Drakeford, 2001; Harris, 2002). Despite this, there has been very little This leads us to argue that a Foucauldian analysis of power relations needs to explore the forms of governmentality that regulate and manage the everyday lives of citizens. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper explores relations of power in social work using insights drawn from the critical 'toolkit' emanating from work of French philosopher, Michel Foucault. The article discusses the relationship between Foucault's conceptual tools of 'knowledge and power', the emergence of 'the modern subject' and the concept of 'governmentality'. Despite ongoing pressures, professional power persists as a foundational element surveillance restricts practice however; on the other complexity opens the space for resistance and new formulations of power relations. important implications for how vulnerable
  • Source
    • "Given the structural pressures and contradictions for professional practice, education, which understands the dynamic of the market, while incorporating a community development perspective of the rights and capacities of disabled people, should underpin any tertiary education. Current trends suggest that social work is identified with authoritarian practices and thinking (Butler and Drakeford 2001, 15). If social workers are not simply to act as the implementing agents of state policies of surveillance, regulation and management, but as true allies in the struggle against oppression, they have to recognise that disabled people are fighting for a different type of autonomy than that envisaged by current interpretations of community care and independent living. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article surveys the potential for critical disability studies to enhance the teaching of social work education and practice. For disabled people social work can be a contradictory experience. Social workers are part of a ‘disabling’ as well as an ‘enabling’ profession and are increasingly coming under the critical gaze of disabled scholars and activists within the disability movement. As a result of a long association with medicalised paradigms of intervention, social work has either failed to take on board new ways of examining the disability experience or simply left disability as a marginal practice concern. Emancipatory paradigms, which place the views of disabled people as central to the change process, are replacing traditional ways of thinking. In this article, teaching disability is explored within the Australian context where market ideologies are heavily influencing the work of social work and other human service professionals. It reviews teaching an elective subject in disability to undergraduate social work students and concludes with implications for change in the social work curriculum, which should have direct impact on the practice of future social workers.
    Practice 09/2007; 19(3):169-183. DOI:10.1080/09503150701574267
Show more

Similar Publications