International Spotlight: Developing a Gerontological Social Policy Agenda for Turkey.

Address correspondence to Özgür Arun, Department of Gerontology, Akdeniz University, 07058, Antalya, Turkey. E-mail: .
The Gerontologist (Impact Factor: 2.48). 12/2013; 53(6):891-897. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnt071
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT From 1960 to 2013, the population of Turkey increased almost threefold, with older adults aged 65 and older increasing almost sevenfold. In light of the demographic revolution in the age composition of world populations, we investigated the following research questions from the perspective of Turkish gerontologists: What are the conditions of older people based on sociological factors such as gender, partnership status, income, education, health, religion, and ethnicity? What should Turkey's gerontological agenda contain for the short term, mid-term, and long term, particularly in view of the rapidly changing nature of political, social, and economic life in the country? By 2025, adults (aged 40-65) will make up the largest population group in Turkey's history. It is time for Turkey to embrace this demographic gift and identify its own gerontological agenda to pave the way for social justice and social citizenship.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to test the predictions of modernization theory concerning the relationship between socioeconomic development and the status of elderly men in Turkish society. Using data derived from Turkish provincial census returns for 1980 and related material, we performed a series of principal component (PC) regression analyses on the data. The results indicated that a greater proportion of elderly men were classified as "head of household" in provinces characterized by low levels of urbanization and industrialization and with high village populations. Labor force participation rates of elderly men also demonstrated a negative relationship to the modernization variables. In contrast, measures of educational and high-level employment status showed a positive relationship with these indexes. These latter variables may reflect historical processes of development and achievements gained earlier in life rather than the current status of elderly men in Turkey. Thus, the study provides strong support for the major tenets of modernization theory.
    Journal of Gerontology 08/1987; 42(4):353-7. DOI:10.1093/geronj/42.4.353
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This research combined cross-sectional and longitudinal data to characterize age-related trajectories in physical disability for adults with and without diabetes in the United States and to investigate if those patterns differ by age, gender, race or ethnicity, and education. Data were examined on 20,433 adults aged 51 and older from the 1998 to 2006 Health and Retirement Study. Multilevel models and a cohort-sequential design were applied to quantitatively depict the age norm of physical disability after age 50. Adults with diabetes not only experience greater levels of physical disability but also faster rates of deterioration over time. This pattern is net of attrition, time-invariant sociodemographic factors, and time-varying chronic disease conditions. Differences in physical disability between adults with and without diabetes were more pronounced in women, non-White, and those of lower education. The moderating effects of gender and education remained robust even after controlling for selected covariates in the model. This study highlighted the consistently greater development of disability over time in adults with diabetes and particularly in those who are women, non-White, or adults of lower education. Future studies are recommended to examine the mechanisms underlying the differential effects of diabetes on physical disability by gender and education.
    The Gerontologist 02/2011; 51(1):51-63. DOI:10.1093/geront/gnq069 · 2.48 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We conducted an integrative review to identify issues and challenges that face aging women and to distinguish areas for future research. We found that many older women continue to face inequities related to health and often are invisible within the discourse of aging policy. In this article we argue for a greater focus on the unique needs of women, a gendered approach to policy and intervention development, and promotion of the health of women across the life span. Policymakers, health care workers, and researchers need to consider the perspective of gender as well as age when implementing and evaluating effective interventions.
    Health Care For Women International 12/2011; 32(12):1031-45. DOI:10.1080/07399332.2011.610539 · 0.63 Impact Factor