Article

Beyond Negative Depictions of Informal Employment: Some Lessons from Moscow

School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England, United Kingdom
Urban Studies (Impact Factor: 1.28). 11/2007; 44(12):2321-2338. DOI: 10.1080/00420980701540945

ABSTRACT Informal employment is conventionally viewed as residual, marginal and sweatshop-like work that impairs urban economic development and social cohesion. Reporting data from 313 interviews conducted with Moscow households during 2005/06, this negative reading is found to apply to just one segment of the informal labour market in this post-socialist city— namely, informal waged employment. Examining the multiple types of informal employment conducted on an own-account basis, more positive impacts emerge of this sphere as the key seedbed for enterprise development and principal mechanism for delivering community self-help. The outcome is a call for a finer-grained understanding and more nuanced policy approach towards informal employment that recognises its plurality of forms and their varying consequences for economic development and social cohesion.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Colin C Williams, Aug 19, 2015
2 Followers
 · 
57 Views
  • Source
    • "'Informal' working, when depicted by such tasks, was integral to the system. Informal working, as Williams and Round (2007: 2326) suggest, thus may be considered as a 'core means of livelihood for a significant proportion of households' that has since been carried over into the new order. Rather than being discouraged by a state's entry into the world economy, the legacies of past practices of informal working are encouraged to expand. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper seeks to explain the continuing lack of economic convergence and the persistence of market dysfunctionality, or wild capitalism, in postcommunist transformation. An overview of key statistics on economic convergence and market failure are presented. The paper then analyses the causes of malaise through the lens of institutionalist and radical perspectives. In doing so key data are assembled and presented from documents of the international financial institutions and other agencies monitoring crime and corruption. The paper concludes that, rather than encourage convergence and tame dysfunctionality, neoliberalism and its offspring of labour market reform have created the conditions for continuing economic divergence and for wild capitalism to survive and thrive.
    Competition and Change 04/2012; 16(2):112. DOI:10.1179/1024529412Z.0000000008
  • Source
    • "Although studies have been conducted on participation in undeclared work in Baltic countries (e.g. Arnstberg 2003; Borén 2003; Hansson 1989; Henckel et al. 2008; Langfeldt 1989; Pavlovskaya 2004; Persson & Malmer 2006; Salmi 2003; Sedlenieks 2003; Surdej 2005; Williams & Round 2007), most tend to be qualitative rather than extensive cross-national surveys. As a result, these one-off small-scale studies do not provide an overview of the extent, distribution and nature of undeclared work in the Baltic region. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Until now, participation in undeclared work has been explained through either a structuralist lens as driven by ‘exclusion’ from state benefits and the circuits of the modern economy or through a neo-liberal and/or post-structuralist lens as driven by the voluntary ‘exit’ of workers out of formal institutions and into this alternative realm. Reporting the results of a 2007 survey of undeclared work in eight Baltic nations, this article reveals how such either/or explanations need to be transcended and replaced with an appreciation of the heterogeneous nature of such work and the diverse motives underpinning participation.
    Journal of Baltic Studies 03/2010; 41(1-1):3-22. DOI:10.1080/01629770903525282 · 0.41 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Reviewing the voluminous definitions of what is variously called the 'underground', 'cash-in-hand', 'undeclared', 'black', 'informal', 'hidden' or 'shadow' economy/sector/work, near enough all define this off-the-books economy in terms of what is absent from or insufficient about it relative to the declared economy (e.g. Thomas, 1992; Portes, 1994; European Commission, 1998, 2007; Williams and Windebank, 1998; Marcelli, Pastor and Joassart, 1999; Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2000a,b, 2002; Renooy et al., 2004; Evans, Syrett and Williams, 2006; Katungi, Neale and Barbour, 2006; Williams and Round, 2007, 2008). Reviewing these definitions, a strong consensus exists over what is absent or missing. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article evaluates whether entrepreneurs trade off-the-books and how this varies across populations. Reporting the results of 811 face-to-face interviews in English affluent and deprived localities, the finding is that even though only a relatively small proportion of all off-the-books work is conducted by nascent and established entrepreneurs, although the share is higher in affluent populations, some three-quarters of business start-ups and the established self-employed trade wholly or partially off-the-books, and this figure is even higher in deprived populations. The outcome is a call to reposition the hidden enterprise culture more centre-stage in discussions of entrepreneurship and enterprise development.
    International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development 01/2009; 7(4). DOI:10.1504/IJMED.2009.026308
Show more