Some Fundamentals of Engaging Stories

Environmental Education Research (Impact Factor: 0.85). 05/1996; 2(2):171-187. DOI: 10.1080/1350462960020204

ABSTRACT This paper discusses a form of information transfer referred to as story. It is suggested that stories serve as a singularly effective replacement for direct experience, a useful but sometimes difficult environmental education technique. The effectiveness of stories is argued to derive from their ability to engage the attention of the reader. The paper concludes with a list of elements that can be used to create cognitively engaging stories.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We may soon face biophysical limits to perpetual growth. Energy supplies may tighten and then begin a long slow descent while defensive expenditures rise to address problems caused by past resource consumption. The outcome may be significant changes in daily routines at the individual and community level. It is difficult to know when this scenario might begin to unfold but it clearly would constitute a new behavioral context, one that the behavioral sciences least attends to. Even if one posits a less dramatic scenario, people may still need to make many urgent and perhaps unsettling transitions. And while a robust response would be needed, it is not at all clear what should be the details of that response. Since it is likely that no single response will fix things everywhere, for all people or for all time, it would be useful to conduct many social experiments. Indeed, a culture of small experiments should be fostered which, at the individual and small group level, can be described as behavioral entrepreneurship. This may have begun, hidden in plain sight, but more social experiments are needed. To be of help, it may be useful to both package behavioral insights in a way that is practitioner-oriented and grounded in biophysical trends and to propose a few key questions that need attention. This paper begins the process of developing a biophysical psychology, incomplete as it is at this early stage.
    Frontiers in Psychology 11/2014; 5(1255). DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01255 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: While the evidence for the effectiveness of the use of stories in science teaching and learning is strengthening in current research and literature, the intervention itself, namely, the science story, still suffers from a lack of definition and conception. The purpose of this paper is to determine the amount of narrative relative to non-narrative material in existing so-called stories for science education and to ascertain whether they are, indeed, stories, with the essential story elements present. The examples presented illustrate the wide range of writing that claims to be “story.” The general indiscriminate use of the term “story” presents a problem in the field of research and in the implementation of teaching methods. Without an instrument like the story construct presented in this paper, it would be impossible to determine whether a text even qualifies as a science story. With a standardized instrument that is defined by a number of fixed criteria, it is possible to analyze and, to a large extent, rate writing claiming to be science stories; however, in the absence of a standardized construct, there is an insufficient basis for comparison among studies in the use of science stories in future research.
    Interchange 01/2015; DOI:10.1007/s10780-015-9232-z
  • Source