Article

Peace education for consensual peace: the essential role of conflict resolution

University of Minnesota, USA
Journal of Peace Education 01/2006; 3(2):147-174. DOI: 10.1080/17400200600874792

ABSTRACT Peace education is a key for establishing and maintaining a consensual peace. Creating an effective peace education program involves five steps. First, a public education system must be established with compulsory attendance; all children and youth should attend so that students from the previously conflicting groups interact and have the opportunity to build positive relationships with each other. Second, a sense of mutuality and common fate needs to be established that highlights mutual goals, the ‘just’ distribution of benefits from achieving the goals, and a common identity. In schools, this is primarily done through the use of cooperative learning. Third, students should be taught the constructive controversy procedure to ensure they know how to make difficult decisions and engage in political discourse. Fourth, students should be taught how to engage in integrative negotiations and peer mediation to resolve their conflicts with each other constructively. Finally, civic values should be inculcated that focus students on the long‐term common good of society.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
53 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper examines how the conflict pyramid, originally defined and used by Richard Cohen, can be used as a model to describe the relations between different conflict resolution education programs and activities included in the programs. The central questions posed in the paper are: How can Richard Cohen’s conflict pyramid be used as a model for describing the relations between different programs and activities? In what way do we need to elaborate the conflict pyramid? How can the elaborated conflict pyramid help teachers and teacher training students to sort out what or which programs and activities to implement and use in school? The number of different conflict resolution education programs has increased immensely over the years. There is a large variety of programs and no systematic way of choosing which one to use in school. Elements of the different programs sometimes overlap but programs are still not alike. Not surprisingly, teachers and other adults in schools often raise the question of what conflict resolution program they should use. Cohen visualises the ideal system of conflicts and conflict resolutions in school environments as a pyramid with four levels: conflict prevention, conflict management, third party support and, finally, stopping destructive conflicts by means of arbitration. This article contains theoretical reflections, developed through a literature study, in order to examine and discuss the use and potential use of this model.
    Journal of Peace Education 09/2010; 7(2):157-169.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The International Baccalaureate (IB) Diploma programme, an internationally recognised pre‐university curriculum, is currently offered by approximately 1500 schools in 120 countries. This article will analyse various dimensions of peace education in the IB Diploma programme, with particular reference to its peace and conflict studies course. This course has been a success in qualitative terms but has not managed to draw in large numbers of students. Ian Harris’ typology of peace education will be used to demonstrate how elements of peace education have found their way into the Diploma programme in other ways as well. It is argued that the IB Diploma programme’s commitment to peace education is mostly achieved through international education, but that the four other types of peace education (human rights education, development education, environmental education and conflict resolution education) are also available. By way of conclusion this article suggests how the peace education embedded in the Diploma programme can be made more explicit and more widely available for a larger number of IB Diploma students.
    Journal of Peace Education 01/2008; 5(1):49-62.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article discusses a qualitative research project designed to investigate processes and outcomes of learning in a first‐year undergraduate course—‘Introduction to conflict resolution: theory and skills’ (ICR)—taught in the Department of Peace Studies at the University of Bradford. The research project was set up to help us understand how students experienced two ‘innovations’ introduced to the course in January 2006—the use of a cooperative learning methodology in the classroom, and the introduction of a reflective portfolio as the main assessment format. The article discusses some of the benefits of using cooperative and reflective learning for teaching conflict resolution theory and skills in a large and diverse class. The article also describes and analyses some of the resistance and contradictions that emerged as we introduced our ‘new’ pedagogy. It also explores some contradictions between our aims and practice, and how these were experienced by students. In conclusion, the article reflects on the broader implications of this experience, specifically related to efforts to develop a relevant pedagogy for peace practitioners in a higher education setting.
    Journal of Peace Education 03/2008; 5(1):97-111.