What, me worry and ruminate about DSM-5 and RDoC?: The importance of targeting negative self-referential processing

Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (Impact Factor: 2.92). 02/2013; 20:259-268. DOI: 10.1111/cpsp.12038

ABSTRACT Rumination, worry, and other forms of negative self-referential processing are familiar to everyone, as reflecting on the self is perhaps our most human characteristic. However, for a substantial subgroup of patients, negative self-referential processing (NSRP) arises in response to intense emotionality, worsening the clinical presentation and diminishing the treatment response. The combination of emotionality and NSRP likely reflects the endophenotype of complicated and treatment refractory patients who fail to achieve a satisfactory treatment response in our trials and our clinics. An important next step is to personalize treatments by deliberately targeting NSRPs within established treatment protocols or in as yet novel treatments. Enriching treatments with mindfulness meditation is one possible avenue for personalized care of patients with this hypothesized endophenotype.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Theories regarding worry have discussed both adaptive and maladaptive functions. The present study used rating scales of the six reasons for worry commonly reported by generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) clients to explore subjective perceptions of the functions of worry held by college student worriers meeting self-reported criteria for GAD and by control subjects. Subjects rated motivation, preparation for the worst, and avoidance/prevention of negative outcomes as the most typical reasons for their worry. However, the GAD group was discriminated from other comparison groups particularly by high ratings of "distraction from more emotional topics" as a reason for their worry.
    Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 04/1995; 26(1):25-30. · 2.23 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The past two decades have brought dramatic progress in the neuroscience of anxiety due, in no small part, to animal findings specifying the neurobiology of Pavlovian fear-conditioning. Fortuitously, this neurally mapped process of fear learning is widely expressed in humans, and has been centrally implicated in the etiology of clinical anxiety. Fear-conditioning experiments in anxiety patients thus represent a unique opportunity to bring recent advances in animal neuroscience to bear on working, brain-based models of clinical anxiety. The current presentation details the neural basis and clinical relevance of fear conditioning, and highlights generalization of conditioned fear to stimuli resembling the conditioned danger cue as one of the more robust conditioning markers of clinical anxiety. Studies testing such generalization across a variety of anxiety disorders (panic, generalized anxiety disorder, and social anxiety disorder) with systematic methods developed in animals will next be presented. Finally, neural accounts of overgeneralization deriving from animal and human data will be described with emphasis given to implications for the neurobiology and treatment of clinical anxiety.
    Depression and Anxiety 03/2012; 29(4):257-63. · 4.61 Impact Factor


Available from
May 20, 2014