IFNγ signaling—Does it mean JAK–STAT?

Department of Pathology, NYU Cancer Institute, New York University Langone School of Medicine, New York, 10016, USA.
Cytokine & growth factor reviews (Impact Factor: 6.54). 10/2008; 19(5):383-394. DOI: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2008.08.004

ABSTRACT The molecular pathways involved in the cellular response to interferon (IFN)γ have been the focus of much research effort due to their importance in host defense against infection and disease, as well as its potential as a therapeutic agent. The discovery of the JAK–STAT signaling pathway greatly enhanced our understanding of the mechanism of IFNγ-mediated gene transcription. However, in recent years it has become apparent that other pathways, including MAP kinase, PI3-K, CaMKII and NF-κB, either co-operate with or act in parallel to JAK–STAT signaling to regulate the many facets of IFNγ biology in a gene- and cell type-specific manner. The complex interactions between JAK/STAT and alternate pathways and the impact of these signaling networks on the biological responses to IFNγ are beginning to be understood. This review summarizes and appraises current advances in our understanding of these complex interactions, their specificity and proposed biological outcomes.

Download full-text


Available from: David Levy, Dec 18, 2014
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pachyonychia congenita (PC) is a keratinizing disorder predominantly caused by mutations in keratin 6a (K6a) (∼50% of cases) or K6b, K16, or K17. One means of treating PC is identification of small-molecule inhibitors of PC-related keratins. Here, we cloned the human K6a promoter, and using a cell-based reporter gene assay, a chemical library was screened for K6a inhibitors. One compound, compactin, the precursor of all cholesterol-lowering statins, was of particular interest. We found that, surprisingly, simvastatin and other statins inhibit K6a promoter activity and K6a protein expression. Further investigation showed that this effect works through cholesterol/mevalonate pathway inhibition rather than an off-target effect. Inhibition of both basal and IFN-γ-inducible K6a expression by statins was demonstrated. Both these K6a inhibitory effects were found to be mediated by Stat1 transcription factor, but only the IFN-γ-inducible promoter activity was controlled via the Stat/JAK pathway. The repressive effect of statins was found to be mediated by the isoprenoid pathway downstream of mevalonate (the intermediate following 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase) but upstream of cholesterol, specifically the geranylgeranylation pathway. These data set the scene for further unraveling signaling pathways that control the K6a promoter, as well as facilitating clinical trials for statins in PC patients.
    Journal of Investigative Dermatology 03/2011; 131(5):1045-52. DOI:10.1038/jid.2011.41 · 6.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We have previously reported that the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) induce profound modifications of the metabolic profile of astrocytes. The present study was undertaken to further characterize the effects of cytokines in astrocytes and to determine whether similar effects could also be observed in neurons. To do so, selected pro-inflammatory (IL-6 and interferon-γ, in addition to the above-mentioned TNFα and IL-1β) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10, transforming growth factor-β1 and interferon-β) were applied to primary neuronal and astrocytic cultures, and key metabolic parameters were assessed. As a general pattern, we observed that pro-inflammatory cytokines increased glucose utilization in astrocytes while the anti-inflammatory cytokines IL-4 and IL-10 decreased astrocytic glucose utilization. In contrast, no significant change could be observed in neurons. When pairs of pro-inflammatory cytokines were co-applied in astrocytes, several additive or synergistic modifications could be observed. In contrast, IL-10 partially attenuated the effects of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Finally, the modifications of the astrocytic metabolism induced by TNFα + IL-1β and interferon-γ modulated neuronal susceptibility to an excitotoxic insult in neuron-astrocyte co-cultures. Together, these results suggest that pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines differentially affect the metabolic profile of astrocytes, and that these changes have functional consequences for surrounding neurons.
    Journal of Neurochemistry 02/2011; 116(4):564-76. DOI:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.07135.x · 4.24 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) regulates various immune responses that are often critical for vaccine-induced protection. In order to annotate the IFN-gamma-related gene interaction network from a large amount of IFN-gamma research reported in the literature, a literature-based discovery approach was applied with a combination of natural language processing (NLP) and network centrality analysis. The interaction network of human IFN-gamma (Gene symbol: IFNG) and its vaccine-specific subnetwork were automatically extracted using abstracts from all articles in PubMed. Four network centrality metrics were further calculated to rank the genes in the constructed networks. The resulting generic IFNG network contains 1060 genes and 26313 interactions among these genes. The vaccine-specific subnetwork contains 102 genes and 154 interactions. Fifty six genes such as TNF, NFKB1, IL2, IL6, and MAPK8 were ranked among the top 25 by at least one of the centrality methods in one or both networks. Gene enrichment analysis indicated that these genes were classified in various immune mechanisms such as response to extracellular stimulus, lymphocyte activation, and regulation of apoptosis. Literature evidence was manually curated for the IFN-gamma relatedness of 56 genes and vaccine development relatedness for 52 genes. This study also generated many new hypotheses worth further experimental studies.
    BioMed Research International 06/2010; 2010:426479. DOI:10.1155/2010/426479 · 2.71 Impact Factor