Ciencia y Enfermeria 01/2008; 14(1):9-15.

ABSTRACT RESUMEN La técnica Delphi se puede considerar como una importante técnica de investigación para utilizarse en el con-texto de los Servicios de Salud. En las ciencias sociales se considera una forma efectiva y válida de reunir infor-mación sobre un tema donde hay escasas evidencias o acuerdos. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar una revisión bibliográfica y se examina críticamente esta técnica. Se analizan sus principales características, las diver-sas variantes en su aplicación y, finalmente, se discute su uso en los Servicios de Salud. Palabras claves: Técnica Delphi, consenso, expertos, servicios de salud. ABSTRACT The method Delphi can be considered as an important investigation methodology to be used in the context of health services. In the social sciences it is considered an effective and valid method of gathering information on a topic about which there is scarce evidence or agreement. The objective of this article is to present a biblio-graphical revision and to examine this method critically. Its main characteristics will be analyzed, the diverse variants in its application, and finally, its use is discussed, regarding the health services.

Download full-text


Available from: Rodrigo Javier Yáñez, Sep 26, 2015
111 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Encourages the use of Delphi for librarians in search of a research methodology. Describes one of many applications of the method, as an example of how the method can be employed in a library-related problem solving process. The Delphi method is an effective means of consensus building, without all the meetings. Includes a description of one such consensus building process, used at an academic library a number of years ago, to determine standardized course content for a formal course in library instruction, a component of the university's general education initiative. A 134-item checklist of learning objectives was distributed to participants, with the aim of refining the list based on an environmental scan of faculty librarians as experts. High consensus learning objectives were included in the manual, and low consensus objectives were not used. Discusses the viability of applying the Delphi technique to library science and librarianship.
    Reference Services Review 05/2004; 32(2):174-184. DOI:10.1108/00907320410537694
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Delphi method provides an opportunity for experts (panelists) to communicate their opinions and knowledge anonymously about a complex problem, to see how their evaluation of the issue aligns with others, and to change their opinions, if desired, after reconsideration of the findings of the group's work. Delphi studies have the potential to provide valuable information, yet few researchers have taken further steps to support or refine their findings. Without this step there is a potential threat to the applicability, or external validity, of the results. The purpose of this article is to present an argument for further inquiry to enhance and support Delphi findings, and specific approaches to this will be considered. Methods to enhance, expand, or refine Delphi study findings are described. Mixed method design within a Delphi study on midwifery practice is described, and a follow-up narrative study to examine the findings is presented. Selected results from the follow up narrative study are presented to convey how the narrative data clarified the Delphi findings. Together, the studies provide a more robust depiction of midwifery practice, process, and outcomes. Although there were similarities to the dimensions identified previously, there was a more dynamic focus and explanation of the interaction between the midwife, the woman who had received midwifery care, and the health care system. Lack of diversity in the sample and the midwives' familiarity with the author's past research represent a potential threat to the findings. Prolonged interviews and multiple narratives were gathered in an effort to control for this. Delphi studies are research exercises conducted by a panel of experts. Designing studies to further enhance, clarify, or refine their findings from the context of practice holds promise for their ability to influence clinical care.
    Journal of Advanced Nursing 04/2004; 45(5):504-11. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02933.x · 1.74 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Delphi technique is an approach used to gain consensus among a panel of experts. This is normally achieved through a series of rounds where information is fed back to panel members using questionnaires. It has been used extensively within social science research and is being increasingly employed by nurse researchers. This popularity has meant that the technique has been adapted in various ways and there is the possibility that the rigour associated with the original format has been threatened. This signals the need for a critical review of the Delphi as a robust and systematic approach to data collection. While there is a great volume of literature surrounding the "Delphi", there is a dearth of papers critically analysing the technique. This paper aims to examine critically the Delphi technique from a range of perspectives. Discussion will focus on problems of definition and the advantages and disadvantages and the techniques' application in nursing. The critique will be structured through an analysis of the key aspects of the Delphi process. These key aspects include analysis of sampling, anonymity, use of experts, rounds and application. The critical analysis highlights the increasing popularity of the Delphi and the modifications to the process which may cause methodological problems. Ultimately, the Delphi has much to offer in terms of gaining consensus from a wide range of individuals on specific topics.
    International Journal of Nursing Studies 05/2001; 38(2):195-200. DOI:10.1016/S0020-7489(00)00044-4 · 2.90 Impact Factor